Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gulam Rasul vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 02, 2017 + CRL.A. 279/2015 GULAM RASUL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae counsel with Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, DHCLSC Panel Lawyer and Mr. Gufram Ali, Advocate versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor with ASI Satya Pal Singh ..... Respondent JUDGMENT % (ORAL) For the offences under Sections 392/3of IPC, appellant was tried and vide impugned judgment of 21st November, 2014, he has been held guilty of committing the aforesaid offences and vide impugned order on sentence of 2nd December, 2014, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 397 of IPC and for the offence under Sections 3of IPC, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of `5,000/- with default clause. At the outset, learned counsel for appellant submits that the offence under Section 397...
Essar Projects(india) Limited vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
$~S-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment dated:2. d June, 2017 + O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 232/2017 ESSAR PROJECTS(INDIA) LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr.Puneet Singh Bindra, Ms.Sumanta Nayak, Mr.Aslam Ahmad, Mr.Sharad Khaira, Ms.Hema and Mr.Sonal Alagh, Advocates Patnaik versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Abhinav Vashist, Senior Advocate along with Mr.Amit Meharia, Ms.Tannishtha Singh and Ms.Ayushi Gupta, Advocates for respondent no.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CAV.PET. /2017(to be numbered) 1. A caveat is said to have been filed, the same is not on record. Let the same be brought on record and numbered. Mr.Abhinav Vashist, Senior Advocate, on instructions, has appeared.2. Accordingly, the caveat stands disposed of. I.A. 7117/2017 (Exemption) OMP (I) (COMM ) 232/2017 Page 1 of 16 3. This is an application filed by petitioner under Section 151 of the Cod...
Shamshad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 150/2015 MEHBOOB Represented by: Mr. K.N. Jha, Adv. ..... Appellant STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. CRL.A. 213/2015 & Crl.M.B. 61/2016 SHAHADUT HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. DHCLSC and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Amicus Curiae.. STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 438/2015 + SHAMSHAD STATE Represented by: Mr. Rajender Chhabra, Adv. ..... Appellant DHCLSC and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Amicus Curiae.. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 479/2015 & Crl.M.B. 369/2017 CRL.A. 150/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 15 MD. ABDUL QAYUM ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Puneet Singhal, Adv. DHCLSC and Mr. Bh...
Puneet Urao vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 01, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 331/2016 HARVINDER SINGH @ RAJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Singh and Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 410/2016 RANJEET URAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 784/2016 & Crl. M(B) 1532/2016 and Crl.M.As.12981-82/2016 MANOJ UARO Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, ..... Appellant Advocate (iv) + CRL.A. 228/2017 & Crl.M.A.3521-22/2017 PUNEET URAO Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate ..... Appellant VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Advocate with Inspector R.K. Meena CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Crl.Appeals 331/16, 410/16, 7& 2Page 1 of 8 JUDGMENT % (ORAL) In the above-captioned four appeals, the challenge is to common impugned judgment of 22nd February, 2016 and order on sentence of 24th February, 2016 vide which all the four appellants have been held guilty for the offence under Section 395 of IPC and ...
Deepak @ Deepchand vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 512/2016 DEEPAK @ DEEPCHAND STATE ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (amicus curiae) and Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh PS Jahangir Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Convicted for offences punishable under Sections 363/342/376(2)/323 IPC Deepak @ Deep Chand challenges the impugned judgment dated 4th February, 2016 and the order on sentence dated 6th February, 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `8,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of `1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 342 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of `20,000/- for the offence punishable under Se...
Md. Abdul Qayum vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 150/2015 MEHBOOB Represented by: Mr. K.N. Jha, Adv. ..... Appellant STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. CRL.A. 213/2015 & Crl.M.B. 61/2016 SHAHADUT HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. DHCLSC and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Amicus Curiae.. STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 438/2015 + SHAMSHAD STATE Represented by: Mr. Rajender Chhabra, Adv. ..... Appellant DHCLSC and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Amicus Curiae.. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 479/2015 & Crl.M.B. 369/2017 CRL.A. 150/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 15 MD. ABDUL QAYUM ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Puneet Singhal, Adv. DHCLSC and Mr. Bh...
Jite vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:01. t June, 2017 CRL. A. 329/2012 JITE STATE CORAM: Through : Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through : Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State along with Ins.Vijay Kumar, P.S. Vivek Vihar ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) is directed against the judgment of the Trial Court dated 30.01.2012 and order on sentence dated 03.02.2012 by which the appellant has been convicted under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. Prior to recording the case of the prosecution, we may note that the incident involved three accused, namely Sumeet, Jite/appellant and Kale. Kale was declared to be a ...
Ranjeet Urao vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 01, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 331/2016 HARVINDER SINGH @ RAJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Singh and Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 410/2016 RANJEET URAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 784/2016 & Crl. M(B) 1532/2016 and Crl.M.As.12981-82/2016 MANOJ UARO Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, ..... Appellant Advocate (iv) + CRL.A. 228/2017 & Crl.M.A.3521-22/2017 PUNEET URAO Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate ..... Appellant VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Advocate with Inspector R.K. Meena CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Crl.Appeals 331/16, 410/16, 7& 2Page 1 of 8 JUDGMENT % (ORAL) In the above-captioned four appeals, the challenge is to common impugned judgment of 22nd February, 2016 and order on sentence of 24th February, 2016 vide which all the four appellants have been held guilty for the offence under Section 395 of IPC and ...
Rajinder Tiwari vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1396/2012 JAMADAR OJHA Decided on:1. t June, 2017 ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Savita Singh, Adv. STATE & ORS. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State ..... Respondent with ASI Tulli Ram, PS Badarpur. Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (Amicus Curiae) for R-2. CRL.A. 134/2013 RAJINDER TIWARI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (Amicus Curiae) STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State ..... Respondent with ASI Tulli Ram, PS Badarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Vide impugned judgment dated 29th August, 2012, Rajinder Tiwari and Sanjay Tiwari were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 498A/304B IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 15th September, 2012 Rajinder Tiwari and Sanjay Tiwari were sentenced to undergo rigorous Crl.A Nos. 1396/2012 & 134/2013 Page 1 of 19 imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each for of...
Rahul vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAHUL STATE Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 500/2014 Represented by: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Adv. ..... Appellant DHCLSC, Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (amicus curiae) with appellant produced in custody. versus Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State ..... Respondent with SI Vipin Kumar PS Kotwali. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Rahul challenges the impugned judgment dated 29th November, 2013 convicting him for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and the order on sentence dated 9th December, 2013 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of 2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for offence punishable under Section 323 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, Learned Counsel for the appellant Mr. Azhar Qayum contends that there are material contradictions in the testimony of prosecutrix as deposed by her i...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »