Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 1 of about 111 results (0.023 seconds)Zahid vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ZAHID CRL.A. 612/2000 Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on: June 28, 2017 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Pandey and Mr.Sohit Choudhary, Advocates. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Praveen Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 11.09.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (in short ASJ) in Sessions Case 3/2000 by which the appellant stands convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (briefly the IPC) and was sentenced to imprisonment for life. A fine of Rs.5000/- was imposed on him and in default of payment of fine, the convict was to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.2. The sentence of the appellant was suspended vide order dated 27.05.2002 by this Court. Crl. A. 612/...
Tag this Judgment!Shabnam Arora vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (Crl) 643/2017 % Judgment Reserved on:30. h May, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on:28. h June, 2017 SHABNAM ARORA Through : Mr.Mohd. Nasir, Mr.Juned Alam, Mr.Mohd. Tabreq and Mr.Umesh Kumar, Advs. along with petitioner. ....... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Ajay Digpaul, Ms.Mohita and Ms.Adrija, Advs. for respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. Present petition has been instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to and for any other writ, order or direction for quashing the order of detention bearing F.No.673/06/2016-Cus.VIII dated 10.10.2016 passed under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (in short COFEPOSA Act) against the hus...
Tag this Judgment!Sushil Kumar @ Guddu vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 656/2000 Judgment Reserved on: May 03, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on: June 28, 2017 SUSHIL KUMAR @ GUDDU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Barauah, Adv. with Mr. Arjun Dewan, Ms.Anupama Kumar & Mr.Shikhar Mittal, Advs. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Harkesh Gava, PS Mandawli, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The appellant has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned judgment dated 29.09.2000 and order on sentence dated 11.10.2000 passed by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Case 1by which the appellant was convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (briefly the IPC). He was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.5000. In default of the fine he was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The sentence of the appellant was suspended vide order dated 30.07.2002 by this Court.2. Br...
Tag this Judgment!Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt Ltd and Ors. Vs.pradeep Kumar Khanna and O ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 3195/2012 & I.A. NOS. 4433/2013, 12308/2013 & 16689/2013 Judgment Reserved on:22. d December, 2016 Judgment Pronounced on:28. h June, 2017 Vidur Impex And Traders Pvt Ltd and Ors. ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Manoj, Mr.M.T. Reddy and Ms.Aparna Sinha, Advs. versus Pradeep Kumar Khanna and Ors. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Yakesh Anand, Ms.Sonam Anand and Mr.Akshay Kapoor, Advs. for defendants no.1 (i) to (iii)/Khanna. Mr.Chetan Sharma and Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advs. with Mr.Mandeep Singh Vinaik Adv. for defendant no.2/Tosh. Mr.C. Mukund and Mr.Vivek Anandh, Advs. for defendant no.4/Bhagwati CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.I.A. Nos. 4433/2013 and 12308/2013 (both under S.151 of the Code by defendant No.2 & defendant No.1(i) to (iii) respectively) 1. Both these applications have been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (briefly the Code) seeking dismissal of the pre...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Bhatia vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d June, 2017 Pronounced on:28. h June, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 789/2017 ANIL BHATIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sushil Bajaj, Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kaushal, & Ms.Aasifa Sheikh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Suresh Chand, PS Rajouri Garden, Delhi in person. Mr.Rakesh Wadhwa & Mr.Ravi Ranjan, Advocates for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.Crl.M.A.10057/2017 1. The applicant was granted interim bail on medical grounds for a period of four weeks vide order dated 26.05.2017 passed by Roster Bench in Crl.M.B. No.920/2017.2. The applicant through the present application had applied for extension of interim bail for a further period of six weeks on the ground that he is going to be operated upon on 02.07.2017.3. It is the case of the prosecution that his successive anticipatory bail applications were dismissed right upto th...
Tag this Judgment!Sonu Sardar vs.the Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI9h March, 2017 Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on:28. h June, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 441/2015 SONU SARDAR ........ Petitioner Through Dr.Yug Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. with Ms.G.M.Padma Priya, Mr.Rishabh Sancheti, Mr.Ashish Virmani, Ms.Parijata Bhardwaj & Ms.Ragini Ahuja, Advs. THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Navin Chawla, Adv. with Mr.Sumit Rajput & Mr.Aditya V. Singh, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Atul Jha, Adv. with Mr.Sandeep Jha, Adv. of Chhattisgarh. for R-2/State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. Present petition has been instituted by the parokar of Sonu Sardar (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the orders of the President of India and the Governor of Chhattisgarh rejecting the mercy petition of the petitioner and to commute the death...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India & Ors. Vs.p.k. Sharma
Court: Delhi
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (C) No.6984/2009 Judgment Reserved on: March 24, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on: June 28, 2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Advocate with Mr. R.N Singh & Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates. versus P.K SHARMA Through: Ms. Vidushi Shubham, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition is to order dated 08.10.2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) in O.A No.2850/2005 whereby the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent by the Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 21.04.2005 of reduction of pay by two stages from Rs.8,700 to Rs.8,300 in the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 w.e.f. 01.05.2005 for a period of two years during which he was to earn no increment of pay.2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the respondent while posted as Inspect...
Tag this Judgment!Gaurav Kathuria vs.central Board of Secondary Education and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~4 & 16 to 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5355/2017 & C.M.Nos. 22651/2017, 22652/2017 GAURAV KATHURIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Khagesh B.Jha, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 5247/2017 & C.M.Nos.22282/2017, 22561- 22562/2017 & Through Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate for R-1. 22695-22697/2017 KASHISH MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Aakansha Nehra, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms.Manisha, Mr.Kartik Rai and Ms.Rajul Jain, Advocates for CBSE. Mr.Nirvikar Verma, Advocate for UOI. Ms.Jaswinder Kaur, Advocate for impleader. Areeb Hasan, Advocate for impleader. + W.P.(C) 5275/2017 SATVIKA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Arunima Dwivedi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Dabas, Advocate for R- 1/UOI. Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms.Manisha, Mr.Kartik Rai and Ms.Rajul Jain, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Vikas Anand & Ors vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi ) & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. 06.2017 $~18 * % + W.P.(C) 1826/2017 VIKAS ANAND & ORS ........ Petitioners versus ........ RESPONDENTS THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Sandeep Khatri, Advocate with petitioners in person. : Mr. Sanjay Lao, Advocate with respondent Nos.1 and 3 in person. SI Sharda Maggo, PS Mandir Marg. Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate for respondent No.2 with No.2 in person. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 10097/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 1826/2017 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.129/16, under Section 498- A/4IPC, Police Station Mandir Marg, Delhi.2. It is submitted that the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 was solemnized as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 25.02.2015.3. Due to differences ...
Tag this Judgment!Badshah vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :08. h March, 2017 Date of decision :20th June, 2017 CRL.A. No.369/2015 BADSHAH STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Sachin Agrawal, Advocates. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This appeal has been instituted by the appellant Badshah son of Shri Jainul assailing the impugned judgment dated 04.09.2014 and impugned order on sentence dated 10.09.2014 of the then learned District & Sessions Judge (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.67/2013 in relation to FIR No.141/2013, Police Station Preet Vihar.2. Vide the impugned judgment dated 04.09.2014, the accused/the appellant herein Badshah was convicted for the commission of the CRL.A.NO.369/2015 Page 1 of 39 offences punishable under Sections 120B r/w 396 & 460/396/412 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and...
Tag this Judgment!