Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govind Raj vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order: May 30th 2017 BAIL APPLN. 994/2017 GOVIND RAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Mr. A.S. Sharma, Advocates THE STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with W/Inspector Vipesh, Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) 1. By this application filed under Section 438 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.467/2017 under Sectionof Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi.2. The case in hand was registered on the complaint of prosecutrix being an employee in a private firm. She had stated in her complaint that she felt love towards the petitioner who made false promise of marriage and also gave her un-hygienic meals for treating her according to his wishes. She also stated that the petitioner had been Crl. L.P. No.323/2017 Page 1 of 6 bla...
Dalip Kumar Harjai & Anr vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 33/2015 & I.A.No.7219/2016 DALIP KUMAR HARJAI & ANR ........ Petitioners STATE Through Mr.Tanuj Khurana, Advocate. versus Through ..... Respondent Date of Decision :30. h May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present petition has been filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of Will dated 05th July, 2013 of deceased Smt.Nirmala Harjai.2. In the petition it has been averred that late Smt.Nirmala Harjai died on 30th January, 2015 and at the time of her death, she was residing at her residence i.e. E-62, Double Storey, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi-15. It has further been averred in the petition that the deceased left behind the following class-I legal heirs: (i) Mr.Vilayati Ram Harjai (husband) (ii) Mr.Dalip Kumar Harjai (son) 3. It is further stated in the petition that the deceased Smt.Nirmala Harjai was a sole owner of the following two properties:-"Page 1 of 3 TEST.CAS.33...
Rajesh @ Rajesh Rickshewala vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~18 and 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 567/2012 Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2017 + + SANJEEV KUMAR @ KALIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Adv. Versus STATE Through: Ms. Radhika and Ms. Aasha ..... Respondent Tiwari, APP for the State Singh, Inspector ATO/Kotwali with SI Rakesh (Kotwali) Surendra CRL.A. 568/2012 RAJESH @ RAJESH RICKSHEWALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur and Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advs. STATE Versus Through: Ms. Radhika and Ms. Aasha ..... Respondent Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Surendra Singh, ATO/Kotwali with SI Rakesh (Kotwali) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 08.12.2011 and order on sentence dated 12.12.2011 by which both the Crl. A. No.567/2012 & 568/2012 Page 1 of 25 appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under ...
Mohd. Yusuf vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 640/2000 BABU Judgment reserved on:25. h April, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:30th May,2017 ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI CRL.A. 720/2000 ..... Respondent Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP MOHD. YUSUF ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr.Yugant Kumar and Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates STATE versus Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Both the appeals have been heard together. Arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel for the parties and the same are being disposed of by a common judgment. CRL.A.Nos.640/2000 & 720/2000 Page 1 of 29 2. Both the appeals have been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and are directed against the judgment and order on sentence dated 09.10.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.15/1998, arising ...
Daulat Ram vs.registrar Co-Operative Societies and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~11 * + W.P.(C) 4996/2017 Through: Mr. Mahendra Singh, Advocate versus DAULAT RAM REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Devesh Singh with Ms. Neealm Cholya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER3005.2017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for several reliefs, including, amongst others, for issuing directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to allot him a flat in the respondent No.2/Society upon appointing an Enquiry Officer to investigate the allegations of forgery and fabrication of documents levelled by him against certain individuals, particularly the respondents No.4 to 7.2. At the outset, it may be noted that instead of impleading the Administrator of the respondent No.2/Society, the petitioner has proceeded to implead the Society through its Authorized Represe...
Atna Engineering Private Limited vs.shubhvir Investments Private Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :06. 12.2016 Judgment pronounced on:30. 05.2017 CO. PET. 471/ 2015 ATNA ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner /Transferor Company No.1 AND SAGIT INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 AND SANAT INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.3 AND PUNJ SONS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.4 AND INDTECH INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner /Transferor Company No.5 AND D AND A FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner /Transferor Company No.6 WITH CO.PET.471/2015 Page 1 of 16 SHUBHVIR INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner /Transferee Company Through: Ms. Babli Kala, Advocate for the... Petitioner Companies. Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL. Ms. Aparna Mudiam, AROC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed jointly, under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (he...
Jaya Rathore & Ors vs.dena Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4943/2017 and CM APPL. 21374/2017 JAYA RATHORE & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Bindu Das, Advocate with Mr. Vijay Rathore, husband of petitioner No.1 in person. versus Through: Mr. Karan Khanna, Advocate DENA BANK CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER3005.2017 ..... Respondent 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 11.05.2017 passed by the learned DRAT, dismissing the appeal filed by them against the order dated 13.04.2017 passed by the DRT, disposing of their application challenging the measures taken by the respondent/Bank under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act by proposing to take over physical possession of the two secured assets offered by the petitioners No.1 and 2 to the respondent/Bank for the loans extended to the petitioners No.3 and 4/proprietorship firms.2. Counsel for the petitioners concedes that strictly speaking, no legal issue has...
Shalu Raghav vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2017 SHALU RAGHAV CRL.REV.P. 83/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.1902/2016 ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Neetu Singh, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Mr.Kedar Yadav, Advocate for R2. ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.REV.P. 58/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. versus MONIL YADAV ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kedar Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + AND + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Aggrieved by an order dated 07.10.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.29/2015 arising out of FIR No.135/2014 PS Chanakya Puri whereby the respondent No.2 Monil Yadav (hereinafter referred as the respondent) was discharged of the offences punishable Crl.R.P.83/2016 & connected matter Page 1 of 6 under Sections 376/328/506 IPC, State and the victim have preferred the present petitions which are contested by the respondent.2. I have heard th...
Mohd. Ismail vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MOHD. ISMAIL FAO No.121/2017 30th May, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.N. Jha, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advocate for Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Advocate for Northern Railways. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 is filed against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 5.10.2016 which has dismissed the claim petition filed by the appellants/applicants. The claim petition was filed on account of death of Mohd. Yakoob on 19.8.2014.2. The facts of the case as pleaded by the appellants/applicants are that the deceased Mohd. Yakoob after purchasing of a valid journey ticket was travelling by Toofan Express Train from New Delhi to Behraich. That when the train reached Itawa FAO No.121/2017 Page 1 of 5 the train took a sudden jerk which resul...
Ridhi Bhagat vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1456/2017 RIDHI BHAGAT Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Uday Chauhan, Adv. for Ms. S.Banal, Adv. for R-1 with Mr. Hem Chand, from the SDM Office Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms. Vanya Khanna, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3005.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks setting aside of the rejection order dated 03.02.2017 whereby the Government of NCT of Delhi has declined to issue a domicile certificate to the petitioner.2. It is contended that the petitioner is the daughter of a serving Army Officer. The father of the petitioner in his service record has WP(C) 1456/2017 Page 1 of 4 shown that he is a permanent resident of D-73, First Floor, Mansrovar Garden, New Delhi-110015.3. It is submitted that th...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »