Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd Akram vs.rakesh Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 1705/2017 & CRL.M.A.No.96MOHD AKRAM ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.R.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.M.Mehdi, Advocate. versus RAKESH ARORA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Prashant Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Kartik Khanna, Advocate. + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 29.03.2017 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision No.47/2017 by which order dated 09.02.2017 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate was upheld. The respondent has opted not to contest the petition.2. During the course of arguments, it was agreed that the petitioner be given two opportunities i.e. effective dates to enable him to examine four witnesses at his own responsibility. It is further agreed that `15,000/- shall be paid as costs to the respondent.3. In view of above, the ...
Neeraj Jain vs.the Registrar of Cooperative Societies Through Its Auth ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:30. 05.2017 RESERVED ON:10. 03.2017 CM APPL.5172/2015, 17009/2015, 27393/2015 & 5305/2017 IN W.P.(C) 5785/2012 ........ Petitioner Versus NEERAJ JAIN THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES THROUGH ITS AUTH. OFFICER AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS REV.PET.558/2016, CM APPL.47499/2016, 47500/2016, 47501/2016, 47502/2016 & 6295/2014 IN W.P.(C) 6906/2012 Versus ........ Petitioner JAGBIR SINGH KALRA AND ORS. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate. Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate for applicants in W.P.(C) 5785/2012. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for North DMC with Ms. Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocates in both matters. Mr. Bhrigu Dhami, Advocate for petitioner no.14 in W.P.(C)6906/2012. Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for DDA with Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate, in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate for non-applicants in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. CORAM: HON'BL...
M/S Hari Chandn Shri Gopal & Anr vs.bal Gopal Fragrances
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :26. 5.2017 Judgment delivered on :30. 5.2017 CS(OS) 800/2010 M/S HARI CHANDN SHRI GOPAL & ANR Through: Plaintiffs Mr. Pravin Anand & Ms. Prachi Agarwal, Advocates Versus BAL GOPAL FRAGRANCES CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.Through: None. .Defendant 1. Present suit is a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction restraining infringement of trademark, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up.2. Plaintiff No.1 is a partnership firm registered in New Delhi engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling tobacco products including flavored chewing tobacco, pan-masala etc. since 1950. Plaintiff No.2 is the licensee of plaintiff No.1 vide license agreement dated 01.04.2009. Plaintiff No.1 is a registered proprietor of the Lord Krishna CS (OS) 800/2010 Page 1 of 6 device/logo (with Lord Krishna playing the flute with a cow in the background), the trademark GOPAL (in hindi as well as englis...
Jai Prakash @ Guddu vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2107/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 30th, 2017 JAI PRAKASH @ GUDDU Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. R.S. Bhind, Advocate STATE & ORS versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ASI Hawa Singh, Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi Mr. Ajay Kumar Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioner, namely, Sh. Jai Prakash @Guddu for quashing of FIR No.447/2013, under Section 452/354A IPC registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi on the basis of a compromise deed between the petitioner and respondent No.2 namely, Smt. Jyoti.2. for respondent-State submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the FIR in question. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Crl.M.C. 2107/2017 Page1 of 7 case is that The the prese...
Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.tosh Apartment Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~25 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 177/2017, CAV Nos.556 & 557/2017 & CM No.21448/2017 Date of decision :30. h May, 2017 VIDUR IMPEX & TRADERS PVT LTD & ORS Through : Mr. Manoj, Ms. Aparna Sinha ..... Appellants versus and Mr. M.T. Reddy, Advs. TOSH APARTMENT PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anjali Sharma and Ms. Geeta Mohanty, Advs. for R-1. and Mr. Yakesh Anand Mr.Nimit Mathur, Advs. for R- 4 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Caveat Nos.556 & 557/2017 1. Caveators are represented and have been heard. The caveats stand discharged. FAO(OS)No.177/2017 Page 1 of 11 FAO(OS) 177/2017 2. By way of the instant appeal, the appellants assail the order dated 28th April , 2017 passed by the ld. Single Judge rejecting I.A.No.7939/2016 in CS(OS)No.864/2014 filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the si...
Sweety Gupta vs.neety Gupta and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~02 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 32/2017 and C.M. Nos.19968/2017 & 19969/2017 SWEETY GUPTA Date of decision:30. h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik and Ms. Aswathy Menon, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent NEETY GUPTA AND ORS Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) There is delay in filing and re-filing of the appeal and applications seeking condonation of delay have been filed. Before issuing notice on the said applications, we have deemed it appropriate to first examine the appeal on merits.2. The present Regular First Appeal impugns order dated 19th September, 2016 by the Learned Single Judge, passing the final decree in the suit for partition.3. The appellant and the respondents are sisters being children of late Shri B.K. Gupta and late Smt. Tara Gupta.4. Neety Gupta, the first respondent in this appeal, had filed CS (OS) No.2209/2008, for partition of property b...
Varsani Construction Company and Anr. Vs.religare Finvest Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO Nos. 259/2017, 260/2017 & 261/2017 30th May, 2017 FAO No.259/2017 VARSANI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ANR.... APPELLANTSMr. Jaspal Singh, Mr. Omar Hoda and Mr. Namrah Nasir, Advocates. Through: versus RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate ..... Respondent 2. FAO No.260/2017 VARSANI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Jaspal Singh, Mr. Omar Hoda and Mr. Namrah Nasir, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. ..... Respondent 3. FAO No.261/2017 VARSANI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Jaspal Singh, Mr. Omar Hoda and Mr. Namrah Nasir, Advocates. versus RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. ..... Respondent FAO Nos. 259/2017, 260/2017 & 261/2017 Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. These appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration...
Vatech Global Co. Ltd vs.unicorn Denmart Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 05.2017 CS(OS) 1849/2015 VATECH GLOBAL CO. LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vinod Khurana, Mr. Mohinder Vig and Mr. Nitin Sen, Advocates. versus UNICORN DENMART LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Gunjan Kumar and Mr. Azhar Alam, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT I.A. 25396/2015 (by defendants u/O37R3(5) r/w S. 151 CPC for leave to defend) I.A No.25397/2015 (under Section 5 of Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing the application under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC) 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Order 37 CPC. It is submitted that plaintiff is an international company incorporated under the laws of Republic of Korea and having its registered office at 13, Samsung 1-ro 2-gil, Hwaseong-si, gyeonggi-do, 445-170, Korea. Mr. Sookeun Park is the Representative Director of Plaintiff and is authorised to sign and verify the plea...
M/S Pratap Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:10. 04.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 05.2017 W.P.(C) 1712/2017 M/S PRATAP TECHNOCRATS PVT. LTD. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Mr. Amit Verma and Mr. Jaideep Singh, Advocates. Versus M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sameer Agrawal, Advocate for respondent no.1/BSNL. Mr. Amir Singh Pasrich and Mr. Kalyan Arambam, Advocates for Intervener in CM No.12180/2017. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates for AST Telecom/Intervener. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioner complains of arbitrariness against the respondent, the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, (BSNL hereafter) for the rejection of its tender. BSNL had invited on 29.10.2015, tenders for outsourcing of Operations and Maintenance (O&M) activities of passive infrastructure along with Sales and Marketing...
Narain Malik vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h May, 2017 Pronounced on:30. h May, 2017 TEST.CAS. 59/2014 NARAIN MALIK ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ankur Arora and Mr.Mohd. Arif, Advocates. versus STATE Through Mr.R.C.Agarwal, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking letter of administration in respect of the properties of late Nalin Malik located within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.2. The petitioner is the wife of late Nalin Malik, who died on 06.05.2013 in New Jersey, USA. The death certificate issued by USA authorities is annexed to the petition. It is also averred that the father of the deceased Nailn Malik namely late Shri Amar Nath Malik had expired on 05.12.2002 and his mother Mrs.Sushila Malik had expired Test Case. No.59/2014 Page 1 of 5 on 27.11.2011 in New Jers...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »