Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The National Insurance Company Limited vs.smt. Pooja Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.262/2017 + % THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED30h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. S.P.Jain and Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Advocates. Through: versus ........ RESPONDENTS SMT. POOJA DEVI & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act is filed by the Insurance Company, the respondent no.2 before the Employees Compensation Commissioner below, impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 30.1.2017 whereby the claim petition filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein was allowed and compensation granted on account of death of Sh. Pradeep who was the husband and father of the claimants/respondent nos.1 and 2. The Employees Compensation Commissioner has awarded compensation as per the statutory formula totaling to Rs.8,36,920/- along with interest at 12% per annum simple. FAO No.26...
Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd vs.neelam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2017 MAC.APP. 898/2015 & CM No.27975/2015 RELIANCE GEN INS CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mrs. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocates. Versus NEELAM & ORS. Through: None. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) The appeal impugns the award of 50% for loss of future prospects on 1. the income of the injured/respondent No.1 by the Tribunal.2. In a motor accident on 10.11.2013, the respondent No.1 was injured and rendered permanently impaired apropos her right lower limb upto 60% while similar assessment in relation to the left lower limb could not be completed as there was a possibility of its improvement after further treatment. In this regard, the Tribunal has recorded as under:-"8. Dr. Abhishek Kashyap, Asst. Professor, Orthopedics, Safdarjung Hospital was produced in the witness box as PW2 and he deposed that he was a member of the Disability Board which...
Rajesh Kumar Rai & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7059/2016 Reserved on :24. h January, 2017 Pronounced on:30. h May, 2017 RAJESH KUMAR RAI & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Joginder Sukhija and Ms. Karuna Chhatwal, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna and Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advs for the UOI. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Advocate University. Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Advocate for the BCI. the Delhi for W.P.(C) 7546/2016 MOHIT DIXIT & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Jai Bansal, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna and Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocates for the UOI. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Advocate University. Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Advocate for the BCI. the Delhi for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.1. This common judgment will dispose of the aforestated writ petitions. WP(C)7059/2016 & WP(C)754...
Geeta Sharma vs.the Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h February, 2017 Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2017 + W.P. (CRL) 2527/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.14648/2016 GEETA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Nishant Kumar Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Zachauah Jacob, Adv. versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Arun Kumar, Adv. for Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R-1. Mr.Atul Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Ritika Talwar, Mr.Abhishek Sharma & Ms.Abhilasha Singh, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus directing respondents No.1 & 2 to produce the daughter of the petitioner, namely, Ms. X (name withheld to maintain privacy), who is a major. It is alleged in the petition that Ms. X is being forced to undergo mental healthcare treatment and admitted in Nightingale Hospital for Mental Health at Mary...
Tripti Goswami@tripti Goswami Grover and Anr vs.consulate General of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~51 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 6413/2016 TRIPTI GOSWAMI@TRIPTI GOSWAMI GROVER AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus CONSULATE GENERAL OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Bankey Bihari, Advocate Nos.1 and 2. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Neeraj Jain with Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advocates for respondent . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3005.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 not to insist upon for adoption deed for entering the name of Mr. Aseem Grover (petitioner No.2) in the WP(C) 6413/2017 Page 1 of 4 column of fathers name in the passport of Ms. Yukti Grover, the daughter of petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.3.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent No.3 has been arrayed with several aliases as there are several cases pending against...
S K Gupta and Anr vs.pooja Gupta and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 9/2017 % S K GUPTA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Mohan with Ms. Sanjana Saroha, Mohanty & Ms. Manisha Advocates. versus POOJA GUPTA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta & Mr. Anshul Garg with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER3005.2017 CM No.21755/2017 1. The present joint application has been filed by the parties stating inter-alia that during the pendency of the appeal, with the intervention of well-wishers and the respective counsels for the parties, they have been able to resolve all their disputes and differences and have arrived at a comprehensive settlement in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 29.05.2017 (Annexure A-1).2. Learned counsels for the parties states in unison that the Settlement Agreement dated 29.05.2017 may be taken on record and the parties be bound down by the terms and conditions re...
State (Nct) of Delhi vs.monil Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2017 SHALU RAGHAV CRL.REV.P. 83/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.1902/2016 ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Neetu Singh, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Mr.Kedar Yadav, Advocate for R2. ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.REV.P. 58/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. versus MONIL YADAV ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kedar Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + AND + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Aggrieved by an order dated 07.10.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.29/2015 arising out of FIR No.135/2014 PS Chanakya Puri whereby the respondent No.2 Monil Yadav (hereinafter referred as the respondent) was discharged of the offences punishable Crl.R.P.83/2016 & connected matter Page 1 of 6 under Sections 376/328/506 IPC, State and the victim have preferred the present petitions which are contested by the respondent.2. I have heard th...
Aditya Gupta vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 30, 2017 W.P.(C) 4984/2017 & C.M.21514/2017 ADITYA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Jha and Mr. B.P. Agarwal, Advocates versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava and Mr. Shagun Trisal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT In this petition, mandamus is sought to respondent-Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. (for short TPDDL) to restore electricity connection to C.A. No.60000001713 of 109 KW at premises No.B-68/2, Wazirpur Industrial Area, Delhi-110052 and in the alternative, grant separate new connection of the same load in the name of petitioner. Upon notice, learned counsel for respondent-TPDDL submits that petitioners application for reconnection/restoration of electric supply to the aforesaid C.A. number has been responded to by respondent vide intimation letter (Annexure P-11) and petitioner has been intimated that th...
Sanjeev Kumar @ Kalia vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~18 and 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 567/2012 Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2017 + + SANJEEV KUMAR @ KALIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Adv. Versus STATE Through: Ms. Radhika and Ms. Aasha ..... Respondent Tiwari, APP for the State Singh, Inspector ATO/Kotwali with SI Rakesh (Kotwali) Surendra CRL.A. 568/2012 RAJESH @ RAJESH RICKSHEWALA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur and Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advs. STATE Versus Through: Ms. Radhika and Ms. Aasha ..... Respondent Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Surendra Singh, ATO/Kotwali with SI Rakesh (Kotwali) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 08.12.2011 and order on sentence dated 12.12.2011 by which both the Crl. A. No.567/2012 & 568/2012 Page 1 of 25 appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under ...
The Hindu Educational Trust vs.university of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 30, 2017 Judgment reserved on: January 30, 2017 + W.P.(C) 494/2013 + W.P.(C) 616/2013 + W.P.(C) 1174/2013 and CM Nos. 28932/2016 and 19213/2014 THE HINDU EDUCATIONAL TRUST THE INDRAPRASTHA EDUCATIONAL TRUST DAULAT RAM COLLEGE SOCIETY, DELHI AND ANR ........ Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Manu Seshadri, Mr. Ishan Bisht and Ms. Sahiba versus Ahluwalia, Advs. (in W.P.(C) 494/2013 & 1174/2013) Mr. G.K. Mishra, Adv. (in W.P.(C) 616/2013) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 As the reliefs prayed for in all these writ petitions being the same with more or less identical facts, the same are being disposed of by this common order / judgment. Suffice to state the primary prayer in these petitions is for quashing of Executive Council Resolution W.P.(C) 494/2...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »