Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Renu Singh vs.all India Institute of Medical Sciences
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2410/2017 & CM No.10389/2017 (for directions) RENU SINGH ........ Petitioner versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Pritika Kumar with Ms. Ishita Bisht, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. B.P. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER3105.2017 Learned counsel for the respondent has handed over to the % 1. learned counsel for the petitioner a CD, which, as per him, contains the digital data of the films and scans of the brother of the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the respondent assures that, in case, any other document/record is required by the petitioner, the respondent shall provide the same, on the petitioner making a request.3. Learned counsel for the respondent has also produced in Court copies of the medical record of the brother of the petitioner. The same are taken on record. The Registry is directed to ...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mishri Lal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2017 MAC.APP. 118/2017 & CM APPL. 4506/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manu Shahalia, Advocate. Versus MISHRI LAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Triloki Nath, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) On 22nd April 2003, Deepak the 24 year old son of Mr. Mishri Lal, 1. (respondent No.1), was on his way to work on a motorcycle when he was hit by an unknown vehicle and he succumbed to the fatal injuries caused to him. The motorcycle was insured with the appellant. Mr. Mishri Lal filed a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) seeking compensation on no fault liability. Deepak was claimed to be earning Rs.3,300/- per month. After the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.4,46,500/- alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filin...
Vikram Sandhu vs.sardar Bhag Singh & Ors (Since Deceased) Thr Legal Re ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS)No.183/2017 Date of decision :31. t May, 2017 VIKRAM SANDHU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Mr. Bhrigu Dhami, Advs. versus Through: Nemo. SARDAR BHAG SINGH & ORS (SINCE DECEASED) THR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The instant appeal has been filed assailing the order dated 29.03.2017 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed I.A. No.2217/2017 (filed under Order IX Rule 9 read with Section 151 CPC), I.A. No.2218/2017 (filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 CPC) and IA No.2219/2017 (under Section 151 CPC) for condonation of 16 days delay in re-filing.2. The facts of the case are in narrow compass. The parties to the present appeal entered into an Agreement to Sale dated 09.09.1994 for sale of the property bearing 2nd Floor Terrace, J-110, South Extens...
Ikramuddin vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. th May, 2017 Pronounced on:31st May, 2017 Crl. A. 110/2007 IKRAMUDDIN ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Manish Kohli, Mr. and Mr. Manjit Pathak Pranav Joshi, Advocates Versus + STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .... RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with SI Omveer Singh, PS Nand Nagri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The appellant was held guilty by judgment dated 14.11.2006 of the court of Additional Sessions Judge in sessions case no.100/2006 for offences punishable under Sections 452, 323, 308 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and awarded punishment, by order on sentence dated 15.11.2006, in terms of which he is to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years, one year and three years with fine of Rs.2,000/-, Rs.1,000/- and Rs.2,000/- respectively, on the three counts, all substantive sentences to run concurrently with benefit of set off granted under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Pr...
Vimla vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
* % + W.P(CRL) 3245/2016 VIMLA STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 05.2017 Delivered on:31. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr.Aditya Aggarwal with Ms.Samia Malik. : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Mr.Lokesh Chandra. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 Vimla, the petitioner, has impugned orders dated 19.05.2016 and 10.08.2016 passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, East District: Delhi, passed in File No.11/2015 and the Lieutenant Governor in Case No.81/2016, respectively whereby she has been externed from the limits of NCT of Delhi for a period of two years and which order passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police has been affirmed and upheld by the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi.2. An externment proposal under Section 47 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 was forwarded against the petit...
Daulat Ram College Society vs.yogesh Tyagi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 30, 2017 Judgment reserved on: January 30, 2017 CONT.CAS(C) 846/2016 DAULAT RAM COLLEGE SOCIETY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Sheshadri, Mr. Ishan Bisht and Ms. Sahiba Ahluwalia, Advs. versus YOGESH TYAGI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non compliance of order dated May 6, 2016. As in terms of order of the Division Bench, liberty was granted to the University to file an application seeking recall of order dated May 6, 2016 and the said application being CM No.28932/2016 in W.P.(C) No.1174/2013 having been decided by this Court as being infructuous, in view of my final conclusion in the writ petition, and notice has not been issued in the contempt petition, I dismiss the petition. MAY...
Ajay Chauhan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2017 AJAY CHAUHAN STATE & ANR. CRL.M.C. 2350/2017 ........ Petitioner Ms.Abhilasha & Mr.Abhishek Jain, Advocates. Through : Mr.Arpit Batra, Advocate with versus Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.9522/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2350/2017 & CRL.M.A.No.9523/2017 (Stay) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.399/2014 registered under Sections 3IPC at PS Nihar Vihar. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. Present petition has been filed only by the petitioner Ajay Crl.M.C. 2350/2017 Page 1 of 2 Chauhan. Rahul, the other accused has not been implicated as a party. It is ...
Oracle Systems Corporation vs.deputy Director of Income Tax Circle 2(1 ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * 17 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5500/2015 ORACLE SYSTEMS CORPORATION ...Petitioner Through: Mr. M.S.Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE21), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEW DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER3005.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Oracle Systems Corporation has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that the notice dated 26th March, 2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act (the Act) seeking to re-open the assessment for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08 be quashed.2. It must be noted at the outset that when this writ petition was listed on 26th May, 2015, while directing notice to be issued in the petition, an interim order was passed staying the further proceedings pursuant to the aforementioned notice dated 26t...
Airports Authority of India vs.artefact Projects Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2017 O.M.P.(COMM) 87/2016 % + AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Versus ARTEFACT PROJECTS LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr Digvijay Rai and Ms Chetna Rai. Mr Arpit Bhargava and Ms Hina Bhargava. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter 'AAI') has filed the present petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) 'the impugned award') passed by the Sole Arbitrator, Shri O.P. Goel, Former Director General, CPWD. impugning an arbitral award dated 23.12.2015 (hereafter 2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between AAI and the respondent (hereafter 'APL') in connection with agreements dated 02.03.2005 and 11.02.2007 (hereinafter the agreements) entered into between the parties. In terms of the said agreements...
Saurabh Kumar @ Sonu Baba vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1937/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 30th, 2017 SAURABH KUMAR @ SONU BABA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate versus STATE & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with W/Sub-Inspector Suman Lata, Police Station Kalyanpuri, New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Saurabh Kumar @ Sonu Baba for quashing of FIR No.381/2014, under Section 354/354A/354B/354D/451/506/509 IPC registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, Delhi on the basis of a settlement between the petitioner and respondent No.2 namely, Smt. Sunita. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the FIR in question. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Crl.M.C. 1937/2017 Page1 of 7 3. The factual matrix of the present c...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »