Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahat Ali vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.558/2001 Date of Decision :11. H MAY, 2017 RAHAT ALI Through Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv. ..... APPELLANT Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Punna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J1 Aggrieved the by judgment of conviction dated 11th June, 2001 convicting the appellant finding him guilty under Sections 308 & 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and order on sentence dated 12th July, 2001, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months while extending the benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C., the present appeal has been filed.2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are within the narrow compass. It emerges from the record that an electric motor belonging to Khalid, a builder, had been stolen upon which Rahat Crl.A. No.558/2001 Page 1 of...
M/S Synergy Telecommunications & Ors vs.m/s Asian Colour Coated Ispat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~38 & 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: May 11, 2017 CM(M) 496/2017 AND + M/S SYNERGY TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao & Mr.Amit A.Pai, Advocates versus M/S ASIAN COLOUR COATED ISPAT LIMITED Through: Mr.Ajit Tewari, Advocate ..... Respondent CM(M) 498/2017 M/S SYNERGY THRISLINGTON & ORS Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao & Mr.Amit A.Pai, Advocates ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr.Ajit Tewari, Advocate M/S ASIAN COLOUR COATED ISPAT LIMITED CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM(M) 496/2017 & CM(M) 498/2017 ..... Respondent 1. The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer for setting aside the order dated 3rd February 2017 whereby the opportunity to file the written statement has been declined as well the order dated 4th July, 2016 striking off their defence. The prayer of the petitioners is that in view of the circumsta...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.ashok Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:11. h May, 2017 MAC.APP. 145/2017 & CM No.6135/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate. Versus ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate for Respondent No.1. + MAC.APP. 147/2017 & CM No.6139/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate. Versus PREMA DEVI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) These appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 1. impugn the common Award dated 17.11.2016 passed in DAR No.D-2awarding compensation of Rs.2,92,464/- and Rs.5,17,450/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum to respondent No.1 respectively in each appeal for the injuries suffered on account of the motor vehicle accident. The MAC.APP.Nos.145 & 147 of 2016 Page 1 of 5 vehicl...
M/S Lochav Store vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~27 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3493/2017 & CM No.15289/2017 (stay) Judgment delivered on:11. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus M/S LOCHAV STORE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Vikas Shokeen, Advocate with Mr. Kulbeer Singh, Inspector. Mr Yogesh Kumar : JUDGMENT1105.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns Suspension-Cum-Show-Cause Notice dated 13.07.2016, whereby the Fair Price Shop License issued to the petitioner has been suspended.2. The petitioner was issued an authorization to run a Fair Price Shop (FPS) under the name and style of M/s. Lochav Store by the Department of Food and Supplies, Government of NCT of Delhi.3. The team deployed by the Enforcement Branch by order dated 30.12.2015 allegedly conducted a survey of the petitioner store and reported discrepancies in the stock and non-supply...
Krishna Flour Mills (Bangalore) Pvt Ltd and Anr. Vs.union of India & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3737/2017 KRISHNA FLOUR MILLS (BANGALORE) PVT LTD AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Purti Marwaha Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Henna George and Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Poonam Kumari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The limited relief prayed for by the petitioners is for directions to the ORDER1105.2017 1. Ministry of Finance, Union of India, the nodal Ministry of BIFR and AAIFR to provide certain documents that form a part of BIFR Case No.58/1992.2. Counsel for the petitioners states that the scheme for rehabilitation of the petitioner No.1/company was sanctioned by the BIFR on 07.03.1994 and the company was revived and discharged from the purview of SICA, on 08.07.1996. Thereafter, some disputes have arisen between the shareholders of the petitioner No.1 and the matter is pending adjudication before the NCLT. ...
Accessories World Car Audio Pvt Ltd vs.capital First Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 75/2016 & CM Nos. 33127/2016, 33128/2016 % 1. ACCESSORIES WORLD CAR AUDIO PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate. versus CAPITAL FIRST LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER1105.2017 Learned Counsels for the parties state in unison that they have arrived at an out of court settlement, the terms and conditions whereof are a part of the letter dated 25.03.2017, addressed by the respondent to the petitioner.2. It has been agreed by the parties that the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs.2,30,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore Thirty Lakhs) to the respondent, in instalments, as detailed in the letter dated 25.03.2017.3. We are informed that the first instalment of Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs) has already been recieved by the respondent.4. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes on behalf of...
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. Vs.central Public Works Department & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~44 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 185/2017 ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Suhail Sehgal and Mr Purushottam, Advocates. versus CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT & ANR. Through: Mr Manish Mohan, CGSC with ....... RESPONDENTS Ms Priyansha Sinha, Ms Sanjana and Mr Manish Saroha, Advoctes for R-1. Mr Ashish Rana, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1105.2017 IA No.5746/2017 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 185/2017 & IA No.5745/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) inter alia seeking several reliefs. However, the only relief pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is for staying the invocation / encashment of the performance bank guarantee (the bank guarantee) issued by Bank of India (respondent No.2) at the instance of the petitioner. O...
m.s Air Car Airlines Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~22 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 05.2017 % + W.P.(C) 12092/2016 & CM No.47752/2016 M.S AIR CAR AIRLINES PVT. LTD. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. D. Bhattacharya with Mr. Piyush Sharma, Ms. Sakshi Jain, Ms. Deeti Ojha, Mr. Rajeev and Mr. Shivam Chanana, Advocates For the Respondent : CORAM:-"Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate. Mr. Kundan Pandey, Asstt. Director with Mr. Yudhvir Singh, Aviation Security Offer. HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1105.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Rejoinder affidavit stated to have been filed by the petitioner is not on record. Let the counsel check up with the Registry and have the same placed on record.2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner had also filed an appeal impugning the order dated 08.12.2016. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the show cause WP(C) 12092/2016...
Sajan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SAJAN STATE + CRL.A. No.605/2001 Date of Decision :11. H MAY, 2017 ..... APPELLANT Through Ms.Sunita Arora, Ms.Vidushi Sharma, Advocates versus ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Akshai Malik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. AND + CRL.A. No.958/2001 OM PRAKASH Through Mr.Ankur Sood, Ms.Romila Mandal, Advocates ..... APPELLANT versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J Both these appeals are disposed of together by this common 1. judgment as the same have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction and order on sentence.2. The present appeals have been preferred aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 8th March, 2001, convicting the Crl.A. Nos.605/2001 & 958/2001 Page 1 of 11 accused Sajan (appellant in Crl.A. No.605/2001) under Sections 452, 393 & 397 Indian Penal Code, 1985 (IPC) and the co-accused Om Prakash (ap...
M/S Synergy Thrislington & Ors vs.m/s Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~38 & 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: May 11, 2017 CM(M) 496/2017 AND + M/S SYNERGY TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao & Mr.Amit A.Pai, Advocates versus M/S ASIAN COLOUR COATED ISPAT LIMITED Through: Mr.Ajit Tewari, Advocate ..... Respondent CM(M) 498/2017 M/S SYNERGY THRISLINGTON & ORS Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao & Mr.Amit A.Pai, Advocates ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr.Ajit Tewari, Advocate M/S ASIAN COLOUR COATED ISPAT LIMITED CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM(M) 496/2017 & CM(M) 498/2017 ..... Respondent 1. The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer for setting aside the order dated 3rd February 2017 whereby the opportunity to file the written statement has been declined as well the order dated 4th July, 2016 striking off their defence. The prayer of the petitioners is that in view of the circumsta...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »