Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Munish Grover vs.state Bank of Indore & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
% + * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h May, 2017 WP(C) No.3046/2017 MUNISH GROVER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ms. Kanika Harshvardhan Agnihotri and Mr. Rathore, Advs. Versus STATE BANK OF INDORE & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and impugning the order dated 1st April, 2017 of the Debt Recovery Tribunal III, Delhi (DRT) as well as the orders dated 9th March, 2017 and 16th March, 2017 of the Debt Recovery Officer - I of DRT-III and seeking to restrain the respondent No.1 State Bank of Indore (Bank) from taking any coercive step in pursuance thereto was listed on urgent mentioning on 1st April, 2017 (holiday) and the counsel for the petitioner heard and the following order was passed. WP(C) No.3046/2017 Page 1 of 20 " Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitte...
Bansi & Anr. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~ * S-1&2 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4531986 BANSI & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumi Anand, Ms. Richa Oberoi, Mr. Prateek Kohli and Mr. Sukriti Singh, Advocates. + versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mrs. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates. AND RFA4161986 RAM CHANDER & ORS. .....Appellant Through: None. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mrs. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER1205.2017 RFA No.453/1986 & RFA No.416/1986 Page 1 of 15 Rev. Pet. 310/2008 & CM Nos. 12163/2008 (for stay) & 12164/2008 (for condonation of delay in filing the review petition) in RFA No.453/1986 Rev. Pet. 309/2008 & CM Nos. 12159/2008 (for stay) & 12160/2008 (fo...
Indian Airlines Kamgaar Sangthan vs.national Aviation Company of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: May 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5202/2010 INDIAN AIRLINES KAMGAR SANGTHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocate with Mr.Saket Sikri, Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Abhinav & Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocates Versus NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY OF INDIA LTD AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra & Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT1... Petitioner is Indian Airlines Kamgar Sangthan, who seeks regularization of its members in this writ petition without disclosing the names and particulars of members of petitioner- Union/ Sangthan. It is also not disclosed in this writ petition as to the dates on which the members of petitioner-Union were initially appointed and for how long they have worked. In any W.P.(C) 5202/2010 Page 1 case, it is evident from the counter filed by respondents that members of petitioner-Union are casual workers, who are wor...
Gola Devi vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~59 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA3422017 & CM Nos.17333-35/2017 Date of decision :12. h May, 2017 GOLA DEVI Through : Mr. N.S. Dalal, Mr. Aman ..... Appellant versus Mudgal and Mr. Toral Banarjee, Advs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.17334/2017 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application is disposed of. CM No.17333/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. LPA No.342/2017 Page 1 of 6 LPA No.342/2017 1. The appellant assails the order dated 21st February, 2017 dismissing W.P.(C)No.1591/2017 on the ground that the appellant had failed to satisfactorily explain the order passed in previous litigation between the parties. To the extent necessary, we briefly note the relevant facts hereafter...
Chander Mohan Chadha & Ors. Vs.singer India Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h May, 2017. CS(OS) No.1956/2006 (Old Suit No.3415/1990) CHANDER MOHAN CHADHA & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Sethi and Mr. Ishan Khanna, Advs. Versus SINGER INDIA LTD. & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayan and Ms. Ankita Kausal, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The five plaintiffs namely Chander Mohan Chadha, Chuniawati Chadha, Kamlesh Sawhney, Poonam Sawhney and Archna Mamgain, on 26th October, 1990, instituted this suit against the Indian Sewing Machine Company Limited for recovery of possession of shop no.13 / 14 (Private No.15) situated in Block-C, Connaught Place, New Delhi and for recovery of Rs.2,000/- per day as damages for unauthorised use and occupation by the defendant Indian Sewing Machine Company Limited of the said premises, pleading (i) that the predecessor-in-title of the plaintiffs had let out the subject shop to Singer Sewing Machine Company, USA on a monthly re...
Hargyan Singh vs.delhi Development Authority Through Its Chairman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.P. Chakravorti, Advocate. 13 $~ * + W.P.(C) 2077/2015 HARGYAN SINGH versus % DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN Through: Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent Date of Decision:11. h May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 06th May, 2009 and 03rd January, 2014 passed by respondent-DDA.... Petitioner also seeks refund of Rs.1,80,930 plus interest @ 7% per annum from the date of deposit i.e. 17th November, 2005 till the date of payment.2. Admittedly, petitioner was allotted an MIG flat with block dated 14th February, 1990 to 21st February, 1990 on cash down basis. However, the petitioner did not accept the said allotment on the ground that he had not been able to obtain loan from any financial institution and/or from Government. He requested that his registration be considered for furt...
Om Prakash vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SAJAN STATE + CRL.A. No.605/2001 Date of Decision :11. H MAY, 2017 ..... APPELLANT Through Ms.Sunita Arora, Ms.Vidushi Sharma, Advocates versus ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Akshai Malik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. AND + CRL.A. No.958/2001 OM PRAKASH Through Mr.Ankur Sood, Ms.Romila Mandal, Advocates ..... APPELLANT versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J Both these appeals are disposed of together by this common 1. judgment as the same have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction and order on sentence.2. The present appeals have been preferred aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 8th March, 2001, convicting the Crl.A. Nos.605/2001 & 958/2001 Page 1 of 11 accused Sajan (appellant in Crl.A. No.605/2001) under Sections 452, 393 & 397 Indian Penal Code, 1985 (IPC) and the co-accused Om Prakash (ap...
Dr N L Vaish and Anr vs.virender Bansal and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 80/2017 Date of decision :11. h May, 2017 DR N L VAISH AND ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Sunil, Adv. with Appellant no.1 versus VIRENDER BANSAL AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Ms. Anjali Chopra, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal has been filed by the appellants assailing the order dated 6th February, 2017 passed in OA No.15/2017 in CS(OS) 1215/2010, whereby the appellants have challenge to the order dated 6th January, 2017 passed by the Joint Registrar in CS(OS) 1215/2010 was rejected.2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are within a narrow campus. The appellants before us are plaintiffs in CS(OS) No.1215/2010 whereby the plaintiffs sought a decree of declaration and possession qua a property on the Alipur Road. The suit was at the stage of evidence before LPA802...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.munna @ Munna Khan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h May, 2017 MAC.APP. 326/2016 & CM No.14302/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.C.S. Parashar, Advocate. Versus MUNNA @ MUNNA KHAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nasir Husain, Mr. Abdul Tahir Khan and Mr. Manish Kumar Shukla, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 with both... RESPONDENTS in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) At joint request, the case is taken up for final hearing.1. The appellant impugns the Award on the ground that multiplier of 18 2. instead of 13 was applied. The claimant is the mother of the deceased- victim of the road accident. The multiplier was adopted based on the age of the victim instead of that of the mother, the survivor. In view of the settled law in the judgment of U. P. State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. Vs. Trilok Chandra and Ors. (1996) 4 SCC362 this cannot be so done. Accordingly, the appropriate multiplier woul...
Akashvani Announcers Association - Aaa vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-11-2017
$~18 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10713/2016 AKASHVANI ANNOUNCERS ASSOCIATION - AAA Judgment delivered on:11. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr Prithu Garg, Advocate. Mr Vivek Goyal and Ms Vanya Khanna, Advocates for UOI. Mr Rajeev Sharma and Ms Radhalakshmi R., Advocates for R-2 & 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1105.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 10713/2016 & CM No.41939/2016(stay) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the dispute pertains to the recognition granted to respondent No.4 Association and the non-grant of recognition to the petitioner Association.2. Learned counsel submits that initially the recognition was granted to 10 Associations for a period of two years and since the period of two years has elapsed, all recognitions earlier granted are no WP(C) 10713/2016 Page 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »