Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish Singh vs.indian Airlines & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: May 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 670/2006 JAGDISH SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshu Mahajan, Mr. Vikas Aggarwal & Mr. Karan Arora, Advocates Versus INDIAN AIRLINES & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra & Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates for respondent No.1 Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for respondent-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL By way of this writ petition, a mandamus is sought to respondents to regularize services of petitioner on the post of Helper (Engineer). A large number of vacancies are said to be available with respondents. According to petitioner, he was selected on the regular post of Helper on 3rd December, 1990 after going through the selection process Page 1 of 3 W.P.(C) 670/2006 and petitioner was kept in the panel along with selected candidates for regular appointment. It is the case of petitioner that vide letter of 3rd December, 1990, responden...
Trinity Institute of Innovation in Professional Studies & Anr vs.ggsip ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~58 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA3572017 & CM Nos.17787-88/2017 Date of decision :12. h May, 2017 TRINITY INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION IN PROFESSIONAL STUDIES & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. R.K. Saini, Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Ms. Minal Sehgal and Mr. Varun Nagrath, Advs. versus GGSIP UNIVERSITY & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shadan Farasat and Mr. Ahmed Said, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.17788/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. LPA No.357/2017 1. By way of this appeal, the appellants assail an order dated 27th April, 2017 passed in W.P.(C)No.2465/2017. LPA No.357/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. It appears that aggrieved by the action of the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIP University hereafter) (respondent no.1 herein) by refusing to...
Gopal Ansal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Ram Chander & Ors. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~ * S-1&2 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4531986 BANSI & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumi Anand, Ms. Richa Oberoi, Mr. Prateek Kohli and Mr. Sukriti Singh, Advocates. + versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mrs. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates. AND RFA4161986 RAM CHANDER & ORS. .....Appellant Through: None. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mrs. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER1205.2017 RFA No.453/1986 & RFA No.416/1986 Page 1 of 15 Rev. Pet. 310/2008 & CM Nos. 12163/2008 (for stay) & 12164/2008 (for condonation of delay in filing the review petition) in RFA No.453/1986 Rev. Pet. 309/2008 & CM Nos. 12159/2008 (for stay) & 12160/2008 (fo...
Mahalaxmi Light House vs.chief Electoral Office & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 227/2017 MAHALAXMI LIGHT HOUSE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Ms Ajay Kumar Tondon, Mr Saran Suri, Mr Roshan Kumar and Ms Rishu Agarwal, Advocates. versus CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICE & ANR. Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1205.2017 IA No.5839/2017 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 227/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 07.01.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the Sole Arbitrator, Justice Jaspal Singh (Retired).4. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with an agreement dated 10.08.1999 (hereafter the Agreement) in respect of supply of tentage, furniture and electrical items fo...
Deepika Sharma vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :12. h May, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 3325/2016 and Crl. M.A. 18049/2016 DEEPIKA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Jain and Mr. M.M. Khan, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Siddarth Sindhu and SI Ram Kishan ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The present petition was filed primarily to seek transfer of the investigation of case FIR No.382/2016 registered on 23.10.2016 in police station Geeta Colony under Sections 302, 34 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act concerning the homicidal death of Vinod Kumar Sharma, the petitioner being his wife.2. The FIR and the initial reports of investigation indicated that there was no eye witness to the occurrence. The petitioner gave some inputs on the basis of CCTV footage indicating presence of the persons she suspects to be involved.3. By earlier order dated 14.12.2016, the investigation ...
D. V. Malhotra vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Suresh Chanchal vs.om Prakash Parocha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SURESH CHANCHAL12h May, 2017 ..... Appellant RSA No.137/2017 Through: Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocate. versus OM PRAKASH PAROCHA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.17825/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.137/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.17824/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant No.1 in the suit, against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 25.9.2010 and the First Appellate Court dated 28.1.2017; whereby the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,15,600/- along with interest has been decreed for a limited sum of Rs.26,000/- RSA No.137/2017 Page 1 of 8 along with interest at the rate of 10% per annum. I note that the suit was filed with respect t...
Punjab National Bank vs.shri Manohar Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4067/2017 & C.M.17887-88/2017 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus SHRI MANOHAR LAL Through: Nemo ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 1st February, 2017 upholds the finding returned in the departmental proceedings against respondent, who had rendered 21 years of service as a Clerk and had superannuated on 31st October, 2015, and substitutes the penalty of dismissal from service with that of compulsory retirement. The challenge to impugned Award by learned counsel for petitioner-Bank is on the ground that punishment of dismissal is not shockingly disproportionate and so, the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) ought not to have interfered with the penalty of dismissal W.P.(C) 4067/2017 Page 1 of 4 inflicted upon respondent as he was found to ...
National Pharmaceuticals Pricing Authority & Anr vs.modi-mundipharma P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~35 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA3582017, CAV No.473/2017 & CM Nos.17884-886/2017 Date of decision :12. h May, 2017 NATIONAL PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC versus with Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. MODI-MUNDIPHARMA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Salil Seth, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Caveat No.473/2017 Caveator is represented and has been heard. The caveat is discharged. CM No.17886/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of.1.2. LPA3582017 Page 1 of 5 CM No.17884/2017 (Condonation of delay of 92 days) 1. Notice.2. Mr. Salil Seth, Advocate accepts notice for the respondent.3. Having regard to the nature of the application, counsels are orally heard on this application seeking condonation of delay.4. We are satisfied that the appellan...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »