Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naeem and Ors. Vs.mohd. Salim and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NAEEM AND ORS. FAO No.273/2016 12th May, 2017 Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus ..... Appellants MOHD. SALIM AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 the appellants/claimants impugn the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 15.01.2016 dismissing the claim petition on the ground that the deceased Habib was found under the influence of alcohol at the time of accident, and hence there is no liability of the respondents in view of the Section 3(1) Proviso (b)(i) of the Employees Compensation Act.2. The facts of the case are that the deceased Habib was employed as a Driver on the TSR/vehicle bearing registration No.DL- 1LF-5330 owned by the respondent no.1 herein and who was the also FAO No.273/2016 Pag...
Vipin Batra vs.baby Arka Batra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12. h May, 2017 + CRL.REV.P. 632/2015 and Crl.M.A.No.3629/2016 VIPIN BATRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manmeet Singh, Mr. Kunal and Mr. Yash Batra, Advocates. versus BABY ARKA BATRA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.L. Mahajan and Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 Instant revision petition is preferred by the petitioner- Vipin Batra under SectionsCr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the impugned order dated 06.06.2015 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Courts, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in M-1titled as Baby Arka & Anr. vs. Vipin Batra.2. The brief facts stated in the application for interim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed before the Court of Chief Crl.Rev.P. 632/2015 Page 1 of 7 Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari, Delhi by the present respondents/petitioners through their mother/next friend/n...
Mahesh & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h May, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2013/2016 & Crl.M.A. 8528/2016 MAHESH & ORS ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Augustine Chatterjee, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with Mr. David Lalrinsanga, Jt. CP SPUWAC, Insp. Seema Singh, PS CWC, Insp. Ajay Sharma, SHO/Mahendra Park and SI Manoj Kumar PS Mahendra Park. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Luthra, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioners who are facing trial in case FIR No.115/2011 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at PS Mahindra Park have challenged the order dated 13th October, 2015 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate allowing the application filed by the State along with the charge sheet seeking condonation of delay in filing the charge sheet and the order dated 9th December, 2015 passed by the leaned Additional Sessions Judge uph...
Ekta Laskar vs.ramjas College and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P (C) 5316/2014 EKTA LASKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sija Nair Pal, Advocate. Versus RAMJAS COLLEGE & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Srivastva with Mr. Rajesh Jha, Advocates for R-1, R-2 & R-3. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for R-4/Delhi University. Mr. Apoorv Kurup with Mr. Avanish Rathi, Advocates for respondent/UGC Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Satya Prakash Singh & Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocates for R-6/UOI. Mr. R.C. Chawla, Standing counsel (EPFO) with Mr. Pradeep Chandra Sati, Advocate for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER1205.2017 Rev. Pet. No.192/2017 (by the petitioner for seeking review of the order dated 23.09.2016) 1. This Review Petition has been filed by the... Petitioner seeking review of the order dated 23.09.2016, passed in W.P. (C) No.5316/2014, Rev. Pet. No.192/2017 in W.P (C) 5316/2014 Page 1 of 5 w...
Sushil Ansal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Dishon vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C.1031/2017 DECIDED ON : MAY12 2017 ........ Petitioner DISHON Through : Mr.Harsh Prabhakar and Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Advocates VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 440(2) Cr.P.C. r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for reduction of the surety amount. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and examined the file. The petitioner is in custody since 24th March, 2016. By an order dated 5th September, 2016, he has been granted bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `1,00,000/- with one surety in the like amount. Certain other conditions have also been imposed.3. The petitioner, however, could not furnish the required surety bond. Crl.M.C.1031/2017 Page 1 of 2 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the suret...
Mangat Singh vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : May 12th, 2017 CRL.A. 566/2001 PARAMJIT KAUR Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. with Ms.Divya Chugh, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State AND CRL.A. 606/2001 MANGAT SINGH Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. with Ms.Divya Chugh, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J1 Since both these appeals have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction and order on sentence, therefore, both these appeals are being decided together.2. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 25.07.2001 Crl.A. Nos.566 & 601 of 2001 Page 1 of 12 convicting the appellants, namely, Paramjeet Kaur and Mangat Singh finding them guilty under Sections 304B/34 and 498A/34 IPC and order on sentence dated ...
Shalini Gupta vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :12. h May, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 810/2016 SHALINI GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha and Mr. Siddharth Acharya, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Mr. Lokesh Chandra, Advocate with Insp. Rajeev Yadav, PS Inder Puri for R-1/State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Heard at length. The petitioner stands summoned by the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate in criminal case arising out of a report under Section 173 Cr. PC., which has been submitted on conclusion of investigation into FIR no.316/2015 alleging offences punishable under Sections 23 and 26 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, the prime allegations being that she had engaged the first informant girl (child) as a household maid-servant and then subjected her to cruelty and exploitation.2. The prime contention on the basis of which the present writ petit...
Anoop Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Commissioner Transport vs.bsc-c&c Jv
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 05.2017 FAO(OS)(COMM) 63/2017, C.M. APPL.10138-10139/2017 COMMISSIONER TRANSPORT ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Sh. Gautam Narayan, ASC (Civil), Sh. R.A. Iyer, Ms. Rhea Verma and Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates. Sh. Vijender Kumar, Deputy Commissioner (Transport) versus BSC-C&C JV ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Navin Kumar, Ms. Rashmeet Kaur and Ms. Arpana Majumdar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. Complaining that a learned single judge erred in refusing to interfere with the award of an arbitral tribunal, the Commissioner, Transport of the Government of NCT of Delhi (hereafter Commissioner) preferred this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act). The impugned judgment rejected the Commissioners objections under Section 34 of the Act to an Award dated 14th December 2015 issued by a...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »