Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Akshay Kumar vs.the Management Committee and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4161/2015 & CM Nos. 7544/2015, 14350/2017 % 1. AKSHAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Advocate. versus THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Meera Mathur, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER1505.2017 Learned counsels for the parties state in unison that the entire disputes raised by the petitioner stand settled inasmuch as the recommendation sent by the respondent No.1/Society in respect of inclusion of the petitioners name in the list of validly enrolled members has been accepted by the DDA and only the physical possession of the flat in question is required to be handed over to the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the entire up-to-date payment in respect of the subject flat has been deposited by the petitioner with th...
Ashok Paswan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:15. h May, 2017 Crl. A. No.872/2012 ASHOK PASWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr.Abhijeet STATE Sharma, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with Insp. Hanumant Singh & SI Vikas Rana, PS F.P. Beri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 12.03.2012 and the order on sentence dated 15.03.2012. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. At the outset, Mr. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has instructions not to ...
Surbhi Shory @ Suchitra Sharma & Anr vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* + $~35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2172017 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 17976/2017 (for stay) and 17977/2017 (for condonation of delay of 233 days in filing the appeal) SURBHI SHORY @ SUCHITRA SHARMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Kartik Khanna and Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % ORDER1205.2017 C.M. Appl. No.17978/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. FAO2172017 1. This first appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is filed by the petitioners in the probate petition, dismissing the probate case with respect to the Will dated 22.8.2007 of the deceased Sh. Bal Kishan Singhal. Admittedly, petitioners are FAO2172017 page 1 of 2 not the natural legal heirs of the deceased Sh. Bal Kishan Singhal and whose natural legal heirs were the respondents in the petition and who propounded another Will dated 10.12.2010.2. Parag...
State vs.mohd Zahid @ Langda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + STATE DECIDED ON : MAY12 2017 CRL.A. 821/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. versus MOHD ZAHID @ LANGDA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Ravi Tikania, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the State to challenge the order dated 09.04.2014 of learned Additional Sessions Judge (Central) in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.at Police Station Chandni Mahal whereby the respondent was awarded sentence for the period already undergone by him in the case. The appeal is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 9.4.2014, the respondent was convicted under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act being in possession of 49 gms of heroine. The respondent has not challenged the conviction. Crl.A.821/2014 Page 1 of 3 3. The learned APP for the State urged that the offence committed by the respondent i...
Vipin Aggarwal vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :12. H MAY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 1928/2017 VIPIN AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vijay Hansaria, Sr.Advocate with versus Mr.A.Shukla & Mr.Vivek Jain, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Anupam S.Sharma, SPP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.7914/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 1928/2017 & CRL.M.A.No.7915/2017 (Stay) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 18.02.2017 of Ld.ACMM, whereby application filed under Section 294 Cr.P.C. seeking admission and denial of certain documents was dismissed. This order was challenged by the petitioner in C.R.No.55/2017, which resulted in its dismissal by an order dated 20.04.2017. Crl.M.C. 1928/2017 Page 1 of 2 2. I have heard the learned Senior...
Atc Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited vs.reliance Communications ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 05.2017 ARB.P. 72/2017 $~OS-4 * % + ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ajit Warrier, Mr.Dushyant Manocha and Mr.Angad Kochhar, Advs. versus RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED..... Respondent Through Mr. Chaitanya Sapaya and Ms.Sayaree Basu Mallik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition is filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to appoint a second arbitrator on the Arbitral Tribunal to be constituted to adjudicate upon the disputes that had arisen between the parties.2. Some of the basic facts are that on 23.9.2009 the parties entered into Passive Telecom Infrastructure Sharing Agreement. Disputes having arisen between the parties the petitioner on 10.9.2016 issued notice invoking the arbitration clause and appointing Honble Mr. Justice (Retd.) R.C.Chopra as the nominee Arbit...
Container Corporation of India Ltd. Vs.b Ghose and Company
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. 05.2017 % + O.M.P. (COMM) 29/2016 CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner versus B GHOSE AND COMPANY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Rishi Awasthi. : Mr Vishesh Issar and Mr Varun Sharma. VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.1413/2016 JUDGMENT1 2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 29/2016 and IA No.1412/2016 3. Container Corporation of India Ltd. (hereafter CONCOR) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) to set aside the arbitral award dated 07.10.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) made by the arbitral tribunal constituted by the sole arbitrator, Justice C. K. Mahajan (Retd.). By the impugned award, the arbitral tribunal has adjudicated the disputes in respect of an Agreement...
Md. Saleem @ Sukha vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 12, 2017 CRL.A. 519/2001 MD. SALEEM @ SUKHA Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr. P.C., the appellant seeks to challenge the impugned judgment dated 12.03.2001, passed in SC No.5/99 in a case registered as FIR No.8under Section 393/397/398/452 of IPC AND Section 27/of Arms Act, at Police Station Hari Nagar, New Delhi. The appellant also challenge the order on sentence dated 12.03.2001, whereby he has been ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment three years with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for a period of three months for the offence under Section 452 of IPC. The appellant was also awarded sentence of rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the off...
Paramjit Kaur vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : May 12th, 2017 CRL.A. 566/2001 PARAMJIT KAUR Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. with Ms.Divya Chugh, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State AND CRL.A. 606/2001 MANGAT SINGH Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. with Ms.Divya Chugh, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J1 Since both these appeals have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction and order on sentence, therefore, both these appeals are being decided together.2. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 25.07.2001 Crl.A. Nos.566 & 601 of 2001 Page 1 of 12 convicting the appellants, namely, Paramjeet Kaur and Mangat Singh finding them guilty under Sections 304B/34 and 498A/34 IPC and order on sentence dated ...
Mukesh Kumar vs.directorate General and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-12-2017
$~1 (DB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5273/2016 MUKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Jha, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Mohan Prashar, Mr. Mayank and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER1205.2017 CM APPL. 27486/2016 (for condonation of delay) 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the review application.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 25 days in filing the review application is condoned.3. The application is disposed of. REVIEW PET. 337/2016 (by the respondents for review of the order dated 31.05.2016) 1. This order is in continuation of the order dated 17.3.2017, on which date after noticing the sequence of events that had taken pla...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »