Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Microsoft Corporation & Ors. Vs.mr. Manish Poddar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
CS (OS) 1100/2009 Page 1 of 1...
Balram Meena vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~24. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7694/2016 Date of decision:15. h May, 2017 BALRAM MEENA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.S. Dalal & Ms. Toral Banerjee, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel for Railways. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This is second round of litigation.2. The petitioner-Balram Meena was selected and appointed as Constable in Railway Protection Force vide letter dated 1st October, 2014.3. While on training, the petitioner was discharged vide order dated 15th June, 2015. Cancellation of selection was for suppression of material facts in the application form for the petitioner has failed to disclose that he was prosecuted and charge sheeted in Crime Case No.162/2004, registered at Police Station Rajgarh, Rajasthan under Section 147/323/341/149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.4. The petitioner ...
Digipro Import & Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~ * 36. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3070/2017 & CM No.13393/2017 DIGIPRO IMPORT & EXPORT PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish with Ms.Anjali Jha Manish, Mr. Sagar Rohtagi and Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Namrata Bhati, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2,3, 4 and 5. SI Adarsh Shrivastava, Superintendent, Central Excise. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER1505.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This writ petition has brought to light certain disturbing facts concerning the functioning of the office of Chief Commissioner of Central Excise (Anti Evasion).2. The Court has perused the original files brought to the Court by Shri Adarsh Shrivastava, Superintendent in the Anti Evasion Wing. The note states that on the basis of intelligence developed in respect of the... Petitioner herein i.e. Digipro Import & Export Pv...
Devi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 15th, 2017 CRL.A. No.3/2002 DEVI .... Appellant Through: Mr.R.P. Kaushik, Advocate. versus STATE .... Respondent Through: Mr.Akshai Malik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Ranveer, Police Station New Ashok Nagar, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 The instant appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 06.12.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code referred to as I.P.C.) and order on sentence dated (hereinafter 11.12.2001, whereby the appellant Smt. Devi has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs.25,000/- for the offence under Section 306 of IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period Crl. A. No.3/2002 Page 1 of 9 of six ...
Santokh Singh vs.registrar of Cooperative Societies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3973/2017 and CM APPL. 17455/2017 1. SANTOKH SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manzar Anis, Advocate for Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who claims to be ORDER1505.2017 the Secretary of the Safdurjung Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., praying inter alia for quashing an order dated 20.03.2017 passed by the respondent/RCS, whereunder an Administrator has been appointed under Section 35(5) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, to manage the affairs of the Society and conduct the election of the Managing Committee of the Society.2. On the last date of hearing, counsel for the respondent, who had appeared on advance notice, had sought time to obtain instructions with regard to the backgroun...
Kuldip Tyagi vs.abhay Kumar Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$ 18 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on :15. h May, 2017 CRL.L.P. 675/2015 KULDIP TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Chadha and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates versus ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocates CRL.L.P. 684/2015 RAMESH YADAV & ANR ........ Petitioner HIRA PRASAD Through: Mr. Vineet Chadha and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocates ..... Respondent CRL.L.P. 685/2015 NARAIN SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Chadha and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates versus Crl.L.P. 675/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 5 + + ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocates CRL.L.P. 686/2015 NARAIN SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Chadha and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates versus ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advo...
Bharat Bhushan Goel vs.p.n.b. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3509/1999 Judgment reserved on: April 26, 2017 Judgment delivered on: May 15, 2017 BHARAT BHUSHAN GOEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Subhiksh Vasudev, Mr.Udayan Tandon, Advs. versus P.N.B. & ORS. Through: Mr.Jagat Arora, Mr.Rajat Arora, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"(i) Issue writ of appropriate nature, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner. (ii) Issue writ of appropriate nature, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant all promotional benefits. (iii) Issue writ of appropriate nature, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay all dues to the petitioner. (iv) may deem fit and proper under the facts and c...
Union of India vs.m/s. Padmini Polymers Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :02. 12.2016 Pronounced on :15. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 412/2006 & 413/2006 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Adv. Versus M/S. PADMINI POLYMERS LTD. & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran with Mr. S. Vasudevan and Mr. Abhinav Jaganathan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J1 These petitions seek the quashing of the orders passed by respondent No.2, Customs Central Excise Settlement Commission ( hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission) on 30.05.2005 and 31.05.2005 by which it allowed the applications of respondent No.1, M/s. Padmini Polymers, under Section 125B of the Customs Act, 1962 (the Act for short). The order is impugned on two grounds inter alia, the first being that the provisions of Section 127A and 127B of the Act are for bona fide applicants to approach the Settlement Commission for settlement o...
Banna Ram & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :15. h MAY, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 3539/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.14941/2016 BANNA RAM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Rajeev Singh, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP with ASI Hariom, PS Moti Nagar. Mr.Mukesh Sharma, Advocate with Mr.J.K.Tripathi, Advocate for R2. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed by Banna Ram (P-1), Sakshi Bhatia (P-2) & Shruti Bhatia (P-3) for quashing of the FIR No.653/2015 registered under Section 3IPC at PS Moti Nagar. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file.3. During the course of arguments, it was fairly admitted by the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as complainants counsel that there is no sufficient material to proceed against P-1 and they have no objection to the quashing of the FIR qua him....
Amar Nath vs.jee Ram & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2017
$~11 * + % AMAR NATH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA3942017 Date of Judgment:15. h May, 2017 Through: J.M Bari, Advocate with Mr. Ms.Meenakshi Bari, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus JEE RAM & ANR. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is the judgment dated 22.03.2011 and decree dated 10.05.2011 as rectified on 04.02.2017 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge, Central-07, Delhi in Suit No.649/2008.2. The suit of the respondents/plaintiffs, for possession against the appellant/defendant in respect of their property consisting of two rooms, latrine, bath-room and balcony on the first floor in the premises No.64/1, Shakar Pur Khas, Delhi-110092, was decreed by judgment dated 22.03.2011 and decree dated 10.05.2011. A decree of permanent injunction was also granted in favour o...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »