Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmi Devi and Anr vs.directorate General, Central Reserve Police (C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~09 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4942/2017 Date of decision:31. t May, 2017 LAKSHMI DEVI AND ANR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Bankey Bihari, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE (CRPF) & ORS Through Mr. Akshay Makhija, Advocate with Mr. S.S.Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This writ petition was listed yesterday and was posted for hearing today as a short issue arises for consideration.2. The petitioners herein are parents of late Constable Bheem Singh, who had laid down his life on 5th September, 2014, while undertaking a rescue operation at Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir. As per the certificate issued by the office of the Commandant, Central Reserve Police Force, late Constable Bheem Singh has been designated as a Shaheed.3. At the time of death, Bheem Singh had left behind a widow, W.P. (C) 4942/2017 Page 1 of 3 who has re-...
Jitender vs.state (n.c.t) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d May, 2017 Decided on:31. t May, 2017 CRL.A. 401/2016 JITENDER Represented by: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate, ..... Appellant versus (DHCLSC) STATE (N.C.T) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Ravinder Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Jitender challenges the impugned judgment dated 1st April, 2016 convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 354 IPC and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) and the order on sentence dated 4th April, 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- each for offences punishable under Section 8 of POCSO Act and Section 354 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that victim could not identify the appellant in the Court. Later when the APP pointed out towards the app...
Piccadily Agro Industries Ltd vs.ashok Jain and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A.No.5710/2016 in CS(COMM) 76/2015 PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD Through Mr. Siddharath Bambha with ..... Plaintiff Mr. Shyam Nandan, Mr. Dhruv Dwivedi, Mr. Shaikh Bakhtiyar and Ms. Snegdha Singh, Advocates ..... Defendants Through Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for D-1 to 5. versus ASHOK JAIN AND ORS AND CS(OS) 2326/2015 & I.As. 15863/2015, 18713/2015, 21691/2015 PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD Through Mr. Siddharath Bambha with ..... Plaintiff Mr. Shyam Nandan, Mr. Dhruv Dwivedi, Mr. Shaikh Bakhtiyar and Ms. Snegdha Singh, Advocates versus SH ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. S.K. Sharma with Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates % :16. h May, 2017 Date of Decision :31. t May, 2017 Reserved On CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN CS (Comm)) No.76/2015 & CS(OS) 2326/2015 Page 1 of 12 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. While I.A.No.5710/2016 has been filed in CS(COMM) No.76/2015 by defendant nos. 4 & 5 under Order VII Rule 10, CPC...
Aarti Anand vs.praveen Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2119/2017 AARTI ANAND ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Shalini Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS PRAVEEN BHATIA ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.8713/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2119/2017 & CRL.M.A.No.8714/2017 (Stay) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 06.12.2016 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was dismissed. Crl.M.C. 2119/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. The petitioner has instituted proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent. The complainant has already produced her evidence. Statement of the respondent ha...
Darpan vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1123/2015 JITENDRA @ JITU Reserved on:9. h May , 2017 Decided on:31. t May, 2017 .... Appellant Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the CRL.A. 1138/2015 State. DARPAN Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. .... Appellant versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State.1. Vide impugned judgment dated 27th August, 2015, Jitendra @ Jitu and Darpan were convicted for the offences punishable Section 328 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 376(2)(g) IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 8th September, 2015, they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of `15,000/- each for offence punishable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for offen...
Palvinder Kaur & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~40 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 5225/2017 PALVINDER KAUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Ms. Amiy Shukla and Mr. Shakti Vardhan, Advocates. Mr Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for UOI Dr. RAjeshwar Rao and Mr. Gyanendra Chaturvedi, Advs. for R-2. Ms. Madhu Gupta and Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advs. for R-3/NHAI CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3105.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.22199/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5225/2017 & CM No.22200/2017 1. The petitioners impugn the action of the respondents in seeking to demolish the houses of E and F Blocks of Pandav Nagar belonging to the petitioners. WP(C) 5225/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. The petitioners also impugn the notice dated 19.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways requi...
Kailash Prasad Meena vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:19. h January, 2017 Date of Decision:31. t May , 2017 W.P.(C) 7981/2012 KAILASH PRASAD MEENA ....... Petitioner Through Ms. M. Sarada and Mr. Rajeev Gautam, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.The petitioner by way of this writ petition under Articleof the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 13.09.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal), dismissing Original Application No.3943/2011.2) The petitioner is an employee of the Postal Department working as a Sorting Assistant at New Delhi Railway Station, Transit Mail Office.3) The Union of India - Respondent No.1 herein, vide Office Memorandum dated 30.4.2007 introduced a scheme for 3 years for conducting an All India Limited Departmental Competitive Examination W.P.(C) No.7981/2012 Page 1 of 11 (LDC...
Re-Emkay International Limited Vs.-
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:10. 04.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:31. 05.2017 CO.PET. 165/2002 RE-EMKAY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate on behalf of the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.CA No.710/2017 1. The present is an application under the provisions of section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), filed by the Official Liquidator, praying as follows: (i) The M/S Emkay International Limitaiton may be kindly considered to be dissolved under Section 481 of the Companies Act 1956 and Official Liquidator may kindly be discharged as Liquidator of the said Company. CO.PET1652002 Page 1 of 9 (ii) The Audit of Half yearly/Annual Accounts of the Company (In Liqn.) to be filed with this Honble High Court may also be dispensed with and the Official Liquidator may be permitted to close the books of accounts after set off/adjusting...
State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs.hari Chand & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~SB-1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + . Date of Judgment:31. t May, 2017 CRL.A. 806/2015 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State HARI CHAND & ORS versus Through: Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. along with Inspector Surya Prakash, SHO, Aman Vihar. ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.A. 343/2016 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State along with Inspector Surya Prakash, SHO, Aman Vihar. versus HARI CHAND & ORS CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeals have been filed by the State against the judgment dated 24.11.2014 passed by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Case no.39/12, FIR No.3PS Aman Vihar and the order on sentence dated 11.12.2014, by which the respondents were convicted under Sections 3IPC. The respondents were directed to pay compensation in the...
Gopal Singh Hanot vs.uco Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5209/2017 & CM APPL.22161-22162/2017 GOPAL SINGH HANOT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Rathi with Ms. Kusum, Advocates. versus UCO BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Mr. Ataur Rahman & Mr. Mohd. Khairul Hussain, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER3105.2017 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition assailing the order dated 13.02.1017 passed by the DRAT-III in RC No.281/2015 where under the objections filed by him in respect of the property mortgaged to the respondent/Bank were dismissed. Admittedly the petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.02.2017 before the learned DRAT by filing an appeal listed as Appeal No.215/2017, on which the notice was issued to the respondent/Bank on 29.05.2017, returnable on 07.06.2017.2. In view of the fact that the petitioner has already filed an appeal against the impugned order dated 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »