Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs.anand Khandelwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 79/2016 Date of decision:16. h May, 2017 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. G.P. Thareja, Advocate alongwith Mr. Pavan Sachdeva, CMD in person. versus ANAND KHANDELWAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjeev Anand & Mr. Akshay Kapoor, Advocates for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Ms. Shashi Panwar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 7 & 10. Counsel for Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This intra-Court appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 partly impugns the order dated 8th January, 2016 whereby IA Nos. 7591/2006 and 9204/2007 in CS(OS) No.1005/1998, M/s M.S. Shoes East Limited versus Anand Khandelwal have been disposed of. The contention is that legal representatives of Anand Khandelwal should be brought on record.2. The appellant herein, the plaintiff, had filed the aforesaid applica...
Manali Singhal & Anr vs.ravi Singhal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h May, 2017. EX.P. No.209/2000, EA No.885/2012 & EA No.400/2016 (both of judgment debtors under Section 47 CPC). MANALI SINGHAL & ANR. ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat and Mr. Santosh Sachin, Advs. versus RAVI SINGHAL & ORS ..... Judgment Debtors Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Rinkel Singh and Mr. Krishan Tewary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Execution is sought of the order dated 28th October, 1998 (in IA No.11261/1997, IA No.2634/1998 and IA No.2635/1998 in CS(OS) No.2583/1997) by attachment of moveable and immoveable properties of the judgment debtors (JDs) including rent yielded by the said properties, and sale thereof.2. The execution petition, pending for the last more than 17 years, along with a number of applications filed therein came up before the undersigned on 24th August, 2016 when the following order ...
Narinder vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t APRIL, 2017 DECIDED ON :16. h MAY, 2017 CRL.A. 457/2014 NARINDER Through : Mr.Harsh Jaidka, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE & ORS Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Aman Gaur proxy counsel for Mr.Rajesh Anand, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.CRL.M.A.No.5852/2014 (Delay) 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, the delay is condoned.2. The application for condonation of delay is disposed of. CRL.A. 457/2014 1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 19.12.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.10PS Najafgarh whereby the respondents were acquitted under Sections 308/3IPC, the appellant - Narinder has filed the instant appeal. The appeal is contested by the respondents. Crl.A. 457/2014 Page 1 of 2 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. During ...
Chand Jain vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~30 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.1777/2017 Date of decision :16. h May, 2017 CHAND JAIN UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : Mr. Sugriva Dubey, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 Yet another writ petition has been filed without setting out any factual reasons for the relief claimed. Reference is made to the indiscriminate report which is without setting out of any specific details of the allegations.2. Not only this, Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD points out that Shri Chand Garg Jain (the petitioner herein), as President of the Akhil Bhartiya Vaish Aggarwal Mahasabha, had earlier filed a writ petition being WP(C)No.833/2017 not only on assertions similar to the present writ petition but also seeking identical prayers as have been made herein. We ha...
Renu Bhandari & Anr. Vs.chander Shekhar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~5. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) No.355/2016 Date of decision:16. h May, 2017 RENU BHANDARI & ANR. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus CHANDER SHEKHAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Jitender Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The dispute inter se parties relates to property No.12B, Rajendra Park, New Delhi admeasuring 1250 square yards.2. This property was owned by late Narain Das and Chetan Das, each being 50% owner. They had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 21st March, 1988.3. Late Chetan Das sold his 50% undivided share in the property to the appellants, namely, Renu Bhandari and Suman Bhandari vide registered deed executed on 3rd day of April, 1998 and registered on 7th April, 1998.4. The legal heirs of Narain Das sold their 25% share in the property in FAO (OS) No.355/2016 Page 1...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~6-12 & 18-20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 05.2017 + + + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1089/2016 & CM No.47471/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. + MAC.APP. 1091/2016 & CM No.47566/2016 MAC.APP. 1081/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ......
Rahul Yadav vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (CRL) 469/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 16th, 2017 RAHUL YADAV Through: Mr. Kamal Pundir, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR...... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State Mr. Indu Shekhar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Rahul Yadav for quashing of FIR No.02/2017, under Sections 506/509/354 IPC registered at Police Station Saket, Delhi on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the petitioner and Respondent No.2, namely, Smt. Preeti Sandhu.2. Learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) for respondent- State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by the adv...
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd vs. M/S Neo News Network & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :12. 5.2017 Judgment delivered on :16. 5.2017 + CS(OS) 1882/2014 & I.A. No.12222/2016 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. K.K. Khetan and Ms.Prachi Aggarwal, Advocates. versus M/S NEO NEWS NETWORK & ANR. ..... Defendants Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing his copyright besides delivery up, rendition of accounts and damages. 2 The plaintiff, Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited, is one of the largest and most reputed music company in the country and is owner of a large repertoire of copyrighted works comprising of cinematographic films, CS(OS) No.1882/2014 Page 1 of 5 sound recordings etc. operating under the brand name T-SERIES. Plaintiff has acquired a copyright in all such literary, musical and other works which it commissions and ma...
Viqar Ahmed vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$ 12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :16. h May, 2017 CRL.L.P. 111/2016 and Crl. M.A. 3138/2016 VIQAR AHMED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shaad Anwar and Ms. Shobhan, Advocates Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for R-1 / State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. By the petition at hand, the petitioner prays for leave under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) to be granted to file a criminal appeal to challenge the order dated 03.10.2015 of the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate passed on the file of the complaint case no.93/1/15 whereby his complaint was dismissed for non-appearance, the consequence whereof was that the second respondent who had been summoned by an earlier order stood acquitted.2. The record has been perused and the learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard at length. Crl.LP1112016 Page 1 of 3 3. In the opinion of this court, these procee...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.united India Insurance Company Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~6-12 & 18-20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 05.2017 + + + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1089/2016 & CM No.47471/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. + MAC.APP. 1091/2016 & CM No.47566/2016 MAC.APP. 1081/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ......
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »