Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India & Ors. Vs.ravi Kant Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:16. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 4168/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus RAVI KANT SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr V.S. R. Krishna, Adv. Through: Ms Pratishtha Vij, Adv ........ RESPONDENTS for respondents 1-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CAV. 480/2017 Since the caveator has put in appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 18266/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4168/2017 and CM APPL.18265/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 07.02.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal) in Original Application (OA) No.3573/2015. The said Original Application preferred by respondent Nos.1 WP(C) No.4168/2017 Page 1 of 13 to 3 herein-assailing the provisional seniority list dated ...
Badal vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
77$~6 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 30/2017 BADAL Date of Judgment:16. h May, 2017 Through: Mr.K.P. Mavi, Adv. with Mr. B.P. ..... Appellant Mishra, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 09.11.2016 by which the appellant has been held guilty for an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and the order on sentence dated 21.11.2016 by which the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.25,000/- and in the event of default in payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. We note at this stage that a co-convict has been convicted by the same judgment under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The appeal filed by the co-convict is also pending.3. Mr.Mavi,...
The Chairman, Ryan International School & Ors. Vs.dinesh Singh Rawat & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h May, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 1298/2017 THE CHAIRMAN, RYAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ORS. Through: Mr. Romy Chacko and ........ Petitioners Mr. Shubham Singh, Advs. Through: Mr. Dilip Singh, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS versus DINESH SINGH RAWAT & ANR. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.5957/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM. No.17625/2017 This is an application filed by the petitioners seeking permission to file additional documents. The same is allowed. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1298/2017 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 17th October, 2016 of the Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.18/2013 whereby the Tribunal has allowed the Appeal and directed the reinstatement of respondent no.1 within four weeks with all consequential W.P.(C) No.1298/2017 Page 1 of 9 benefits an...
Bimla vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. T APRIL, 2017 DECIDED ON :16. H MAY, 2017 BIMLA CRL.A. 381/2014 Through : Mr.Aman Gaur proxy counsel for Mr.Rajesh Anand, Advocate. ..... Appellant VERSUS THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. Mr.Harsh Jaidka, Advocate, for R-2 to 4 and R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 19.12.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.10PS Najafgarh, the instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant - Bimla to challenge respondents acquittal under Sections 308/4IPC. The appeal is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. At the outset, it may be recorded that the respondent No.5, Jagbir Singh has since expired and proceedings against him have been dropped as abated. It is also pertinent to note that cross-case vide FIR Crl.A.381/2014 Page 1 of 6 No.1031/20...
The Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.4111/2017 and CM No.18013/2017 Date of decision :16. h May, 2017 THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Amit Bhagat, Adv. versus NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Rajinder Wali, Adv. for R- 1/NBCC. Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Adwaita Sharma and Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advs. for R- 2/ITPO. Mr. Naveen R. Nath and Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Advs. for R-3/Council of Architecture. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petition claiming to be by way of public interest litigation, has been filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, which is registered society under the Provisions of the Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860 as a voluntary organization of Architects to W.P.(C) 4111/2017 Page 1 of 6 encourage study of Architecture and to elevate the standard of architectural pr...
Dharambir Khattar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$ 7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :16. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 117/2007 and Crl. M.A. 2006/2007 DHARAMBIR KHATTAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Ms. Jeewan Chandna, Mr. N. Parikshith, Ms. Madhu Shah, Advocates CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant is an accused (second accused to be precise) in a criminal case, which is stated to be pending on the file of the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) on the basis of a report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted by the respondent / Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on conclusion of investigation into the case registered as RC25A)/03/CBI/ACB / New Delhi. By order dated 05.02.2007 on the file of the said criminal case CC No.25/5, the learned Special Judge directed, inter alia, a complaint to be made over to the court of the...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.rajender Awasthi & Ors (United India In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~6-12 & 18-20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 05.2017 + + + MAC.APP. 1081/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1088/2016 & CM No.47468/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. MAC.APP. 1089/2016 & CM No.47471/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1. + MAC.APP. 1091/2016 & CM No.47566/2016 MAC.APP. 1081/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ......
Hindustan Lever Ltd. Now Know as Hindustan Unilever Limited vs.union o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 6 + W.P.(C) 2632/2017 & CM APPLs 11444/2017, 14560/2017, 18504/2017, 18505/2017 HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD. NOW KNOW AS HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms Reena Khaur, Mr Rajesh Sharma and Ms Rita Jha, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr Abhishek Ghai, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER1605.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, by way of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to challenge the Final Finding dated 6th March 2017 issued by the Director General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties (Respondent No.4) recommending levy of anti-dumping duty on imports of LAB from Qatar, Iran and China in exercise of the powers under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 ('CTA') read with the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dump...
Pradeep Kumar vs.saroj Bala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :16. h MAY, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 2051/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.8685/2016 PRADEEP KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Anunaya Mehta, Advocate. versus SAROJ BALA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Aggrieved by an order dated 09.12.2015 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate granting interim maintenance to the respondent and her children to the tune of `30,000/- per month with effect from 05.08.2015 and endorsed a judgment dated 11.03.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.3/2016, the instant petition has been preferred. It is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The petitioner is admittedly working as TTE in Railways. The respondent is not generating any income whatsoever. She is purportedly suffering from an eye problem. Crl.M.C...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sheetal Sahota & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~10 * % + MAC.APP. 798/2014 & CM No.14461/2014 Date of Decision:16. h May, 2017 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant SHEETAL SAHOTA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nusrat Hussain and Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Advs. for R1 to R4 and R7 to R8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.22,62,520/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 6.2. The accident dated 04th September, 2013 resulted in the death of Sandeep Sahota. The deceased was survived by his widow, three minor children and parents. The deceased was aged 31 years and it was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.30,000/- at the time of accident. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.9,386/-, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 16 to compute the loss of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »