Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Swabhiman Vyapaar Pvt Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Ce ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * 22. + 23. + 24. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5424/2016 & CM225832016 (for stay) BINDLAS DUPLUX LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5425/2016 & CM225852016 (for stay) SWABHIMAN VYAPAAR PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5427/2016 & CM225892016 (for stay) BRINA GOPAL TRADERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, WP (C) Nos.5424; 5425; 5427 & ...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.zelahi Devi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~22 * % + UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION MAC.APP. 583/2016 Judgment delivered on:17. 05.2017 ..... Appellant ZELAHI DEVI & ANR Through: Ms. Nupur Kumar for Ms. Garima Prashad, Advs. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Adv. for R-1 & R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the MACT order dated 06.04.2016 passed in MAC No.423 of 2016 whereby the Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs.17,48,843/- to the respondents - relatives of the motor vehicle accident victim Munna Kumar, involving the appellants vehicle.2. On 08.05.2014 at around 12:30 am when the deceased Munna was returning home after an office party, he was hit by the appellant - UP Roadways bus which was being driven at a high speed. He sustained grievous injuries and ultimately succumbed to the injuries on 13.05.2014. An FIR was registered against the driver of the bus under sections 279/304A of the Indian Pena...
Devender vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Rohit Chawla vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Surinder Krishan Bakshi vs.m/s s.k. Medicos P. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~20 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7222005 Date of Judgment:17. h May, 2017 SURINDER KRISHAN BAKSHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.P.S. Bindra, Adv. with Ms.Rishika Aorra, Advocate. versus M/S S.K. MEDICOS P. LTD. & ANR. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.P. Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Ramji Pandey, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant/plaintiff has challenged the impugned judgment and decree dated 15th July, 2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, to the extent of not allowing his claim for damages to furniture, fixtures & fittings and not granting pendent lite and future interest till the date of actual payment of the decretal amount.2. Appellant/plaintiff had leased out the ground floor of premises No.A- 271, Shivalik, New Delhi, to respondent/defendant No.1 through respondent/defendant No.2, who is Director of defendant No.1, vide registered lease deed dated 4th October, 2002 for a period of one year w...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.rajender & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h May, 2017 MAC.APP. 364/2017 & CM Nos.14236 & 14360/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P.Jain and Mr. Himanshu Versus Gambhir, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. RAJENDER & ORS. $~25 & 26 * % + + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MAC.APP. 373/2017 & CM No.14465/2017 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. BALRAM & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P.Jain and Mr. Himanshu Versus Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. Gambhir, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. At joint request, the appeals are taken up for disposal.2. MAC. APP. No.364/2017 and MAC. APP. No.373/2017 impugn the Award dated 25.01.2017 passed in Suit No.51and Suit No.49granting a compensation of Rs.12,69,000/- and Rs.45,000/- in favour of respondent No.1/injured Rajender and Balram, respectively alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim MAC....
Sudhir Gopi vs.indira Gandhi National Open University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16.05.2017 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + O.M.P. (COMM) 22/2016 SUDHIR GOPI Versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : : Mr Ashish Dholakia with Mr D. Kishore, Mr Gautam Bajaj, Ms Raji Joseph and Mr N. P. Rakesh. Mr Aly Mirza for Respondent No.1. Mr Jaimon Andrews for Respondent No.2. JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J I.A. No.1239/2016 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the present petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 22/2016 3. Shri Sudhir Gopi, Chairman and Managing Director of Universal Empire Institute of Technology (UEIT) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the O.M.P. (COMM) 22/2016 Page 1 of 24 Act) for setting aside the arbitral award dated 20.0...
Ameeta Mehra vs.additional Director of Income Tax (Inv)-Unit and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1471/2013 AMEETA MEHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Ritika Goyal and Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV)-UNIT AND ANR. Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS $~ * 10 + CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER1605.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Ms. Ameeta Mehra, the... Petitioner, has in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India sought a declaration that the warrant of authorization dated 27 th February, 2012 issued by the Additional Director of Income Tax (Inv) Unit II (Respondent No.1) under Section 132 of the Income tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') in the name of the... Petitioner to search locker No.4979 with the Delhi Safe Deposit Co. Ltd., New Delhi. The... Petitioner also seeks the quashing of the notice dated 22nd October 2012 issued to her under Sec...
B Mangla vs.the Director of Education & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA3432017 Date of Decision:16. 05.2017 B MANGLA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Khalid Arshad, Advocate. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. We have heard learned counsel and proceed to dispose of the present appeal.2. The appellant preferred W.P. (C) No.7249/2002 to seek successive promotions to the posts of PGT, Vice-Principal and Principal in the respondent no.3 school. She also sought quashing of promotions granted to respondents No.4 & 5 who were also serving in the respondent no.3 school. She also prayed for compensation from the respondents in her writ petition.3. The writ petition was preferred, as noted above, in the year 2002. It LPA No.343/2017 Page 1 of 11 appears that the said writ petition came up ...
Mool Chand vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2017
$~17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1353/2013 Date of Judgment:16. h May, 2017 MOOL CHAND STATE CORAM: Through : Mr.Kanhaiya Singhal, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with W/SI Rama Saroha. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) filed against the judgment of conviction dated 28.06.2013 and order on sentence dated 29.06.2013 by which the appellant has been convicted under Sections(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for the offence committed under Section 363 IPC with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The appellant further stands sentenced to life imprisonment for the offence committed under Section 376 (2) (f) a...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »