Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Chaudhary vs.uma Khosla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~38 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) No.154/2017 and CAV4852017 & CM Nos.18670/2017 18672/2017 Date of decision :17. h May, 2017 VIJAY CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Shikha Khandelwal and versus Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Advs. UMA KHOSLA Through : Mr. V.Dabas and ..... Respondent Mr. Ashim Vachcher, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.18672/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. Caveat No.485/2017 As the Caveator is represented and has been heard, the caveat stands discharged. CM No.18671/2017 (delay in refiling) 1. We have heard ld. counsel for the parties on this application. FAO(OS) 154/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. We are satisfied that the appellants have adequately explained the circumstances in which the delay in re-filing this appeal has occasioned. The delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned.3. The application is dis...
M/S Jupiter Wagons Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:17. 05.2017 + W.P. (C) 3410/2015, CM APPL.6107 & 21655/2015 M/S JUPITER WAGONS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. U. Hazarika, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rupal Luthra and Ms. Abhinandana Kain, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate for Railways. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioner, is an incorporated company that supplies fabricated bogies for coaches used by the Railways, and has been carrying on business since 27.06.2006. It is aggrieved by the respondent/Indian Railways (hereafter Railways) inaction with respect to a tender issued by the latter, for procuring 500 railway wagons. The petitioner, in this proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution, complains of arbitrariness by the Railways.2. The Railways has its own manufacturing units for...
Pioneer Overseas Corporation Usa (India Branch) vs.commissioner of Inc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * 7 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5423/2016 PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION USA (INDIA BRANCH) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Ms. Mehak Gupta, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)- 2 DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER1705.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is a writ petition by M/s. Pioneer Overseas Corporation USA, seeking a direction to quash the impugned order dated 6th May 2016 passed by the Respondent, Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) 2, Delhi (CIT) whereby the application filed by the... Petitioner for waiver of interest under Section 220 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) was rejected on the ground that the... Petitioner failed to meet the very first condition laid down in Section 220 (2A) of the Act vi...
Chain Roop Bhansali vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~20 * + CHAIN ROOP BHANSALI W.P.(C) 5134/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mr. Pranjal Srivastava and Ms. Rano Jain, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. (Mr.) G.L. Bhatia, Government Pleader for the Union of India. Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing Counsel & Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1705.2017 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings of recovery of demand raised on the basis of an Assessment Order dated 28th March, 1995 for Assessment Years (AYs) 1986-87 to 1989- 90 and 1992-93.2. The facts in brief are that on 2nd January, 1995, the... Petitioner (Assessee) filed an application before the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) under Section 245 C (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) for AYs 1985- 86 to 1993-94. A copy of th...
Tehri Pulp & Paper Ltd vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Centra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * 22. + 23. + 24. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5424/2016 & CM225832016 (for stay) BINDLAS DUPLUX LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5425/2016 & CM225852016 (for stay) SWABHIMAN VYAPAAR PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5427/2016 & CM225892016 (for stay) BRINA GOPAL TRADERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, WP (C) Nos.5424; 5425; 5427 & ...
Murari Lal Sharma vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
c.b. Rawat vs.the Nav Jagriti Cghs Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4202/2017 and CM APPL.18392-93/2017 1. C.B. RAWAT Through: Dr. Naipal Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus THE NAV JAGRITI CGHS LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing an order ORDER1705.2017 dated 05.10.2016 passed by the Delhi Co-operative Tribunal, dismissing his appeal against the Award dated 03.10.2006 passed by the learned Arbitrator appointed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, directing him to pay a sum of Rs.32,374/- to the respondent/Society towards the outstanding dues.2. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of h...
Govind Singh & Anr. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.vto (Ward 205) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 10.2016 Pronounced on:17. 05.2017 ST. APPL.26/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. ST. APPL.27/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 10726/2006 GLAXO SMITH KLINE ASIA P. LTD. .Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran with Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Sh. Yogendra Aldak, Sh. Anshul Mathur and Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE ..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page...
M/S Milestone Games Pvt Ltd vs.anil Kumar Mehta (Huf) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:17. 05.2017 FAO (OS) (COMM) 91/2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parikshit Kumar, Advocate. $~6 * % + M/S MILESTONE GAMES PVT LTD ANIL KUMAR MEHTA (HUF) & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ekansh Bansal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order of the learned Single Judge whereby its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was rejected.2. The relevant facts are that the appellant entered into lease arrangement on 15.03.2012 with the respondents (hereafter referred to as lessor/owner). In sum, the arrangement contemplated letting out of a property for three years at monthly rent of `2,62,960/-; the appellant has also paid `10,51,840/- (equivalent to four months rent as interest free security deposit). The agreement contained an arbitration clause. The owners complained that the...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »