Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 17 2017

Ranjit Singh vs.ndmc & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

State vs.lucky

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + STATE LUCKY CRL.A.539/2016 versus Reserved on:05. 05.2017 Delivered on:17. 05.2017 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP : Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The State has called in question the correctness of the order of sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-04 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.7/2014 whereby the accused person/respondent, though has been convicted under Sectionread with section 34 of the IPC, but has been let off on probation of good conduct, subject to his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like amount before the Probation Officer to appear and receive sentence when called upon during the period of probation and in the meantime to keep peace and good behavior for a period of one year from the date of furnishing of th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

Puran Chand vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

M/S Hasija Bros. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4201/2017 Judgment delivered on:17. 05.2017 versus M/S HASIJA BROS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS: : ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Sanjiv Kumar & Ms Vasudha Mr Akshay Choudhary for Mr Raman Duggal for GNCTD. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1705.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.18391/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4201/2017 & CM No.18390/2017(stay) 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing today. W.P.(C) No4201 /2017 Page 1 of 6 3. The petitioner impugns Suspension Order dated 29.10.2016, whereby the Fair Price Shop License issued to the petitioner has been suspended.4. The petitioner was issued an authorization to run a Fair Price Shop (FPS) under the name and st...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

Vijay Chaudhary vs.ramma Sahni

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

$~37 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS)No.153/2017 and CAV4842017 & CM Nos.18666/2017 18668/2017 Date of decision :17. h May, 2017 VIJAY CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Shikha Khandelwal and versus Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Advs. RAMMA SAHNI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. V.Dabas and Mr. Ashim Vachcher, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.18668/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. Caveat No.484/2017 As the Caveator is represented and has been heard, the caveat stands discharged. CM No.18667/2017 (delay in refiling) 1. We have heard ld. counsel for the parties on this application. W.P.(C) 153/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. We are satisfied that the appellants have adequately explained the circumstances in which the delay in re-filing this appeal has occasioned. The delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned.3. The application is dis...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

Shitije Jain vs.balbir Singh & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 17, 2017 + SHITIJE JAIN CM(M) No.547/2017 Through: Mr.Vikrant Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None BALBIR SINGH & ANR CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM No.18638/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM(M) 547/2017 1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by assailing the order dated 31st March, 2017 whereby the application filed by him for his impleadment in RCA No.61245/2016 titled as Balbir Singh Vs. Padam Chand Jain has been dismissed.2. Perusal of the record reveals that Civil Suit No.55/2014 was filed by Sh.Padam Chand Jain seeking a decree of possession against the tenant Sh.Balbir Singh claiming himself to be the landlord and joint owner of the CM(M) No.547/2017 Page 1 of 8 suit property bearing no.E-2/4, Main Bazar Road, Shas...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.balram & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h May, 2017 MAC.APP. 364/2017 & CM Nos.14236 & 14360/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P.Jain and Mr. Himanshu Versus Gambhir, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. RAJENDER & ORS. $~25 & 26 * % + + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MAC.APP. 373/2017 & CM No.14465/2017 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. BALRAM & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P.Jain and Mr. Himanshu Versus Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. Gambhir, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. At joint request, the appeals are taken up for disposal.2. MAC. APP. No.364/2017 and MAC. APP. No.373/2017 impugn the Award dated 25.01.2017 passed in Suit No.51and Suit No.49granting a compensation of Rs.12,69,000/- and Rs.45,000/- in favour of respondent No.1/injured Rajender and Balram, respectively alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim MAC....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017

Jeevan Jena vs.state of Nct & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2017

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:17. h May, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 4486/2015 JEEVAN JENA Through: Mr.Rahul Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners CORAM: versus STATE OF NCT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State Mr.R.P.S.Bhatti, Adv. for R-2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C challenging the impugned orders dated 18.08.2015 and 17.10.2015 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (NI Act)/Patiala House Courts/New Delhi in case title Mahender Singh Rawat versus Jeevan Jena C.C. No.81dismissing the application filed by the petitioner herein under Section 311 Cr.P.C.2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner-accused that out of total 11 cited witnesses only three were examined by the petitioner- accused and vide impugned order dated 18.08.2015 defence evidence was closed. Thereafter, the petitioner-accused filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C seeking examinati...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2017