Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
g.d Foods Mfg (India) Pvt Ltd. Vs.zihawa Foods Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. 05.2017 CS(OS) 813/2013, CC No.83/2013, Crl.M.A.17221/2013, I.A. 17871/2013 (O6R17 G.D FOODS MFG (INDIA) PVT LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Mr.Joseph Koshy, Ms. Divyani Singh and Mr. Rahul Vidhani and Ms.Sheetal Srivastava, Advocates versus ZIHAWA FOODS PVT LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mr.Veerabhadraian and Mr.Sharana Gouda Patil, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA I.A. 18308/2013 (O VII R11(a) (b) & (d) CPC) JUDGMENT1 Vide this application, the defendant has sought the dismissal of the suit alleging that since the plaintiff is not the registered owner of the trademark TOPS, his suit for infringement of the trademark is not maintainable. It is submitted that the plaintiffs claim that it is an assignee is not maintainable, as in view of Section 45 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, an assignee does not become the owner of a trademark unless it is registered in his name and his n...
McDonalds India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 10.2016 Pronounced on:17. 05.2017 ST. APPL.26/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. ST. APPL.27/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 10726/2006 GLAXO SMITH KLINE ASIA P. LTD. .Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran with Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Sh. Yogendra Aldak, Sh. Anshul Mathur and Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE ..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page...
Shri Arun Malhotra vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA3032017 SHRI ARUN MALHOTRA ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somil Aggarwal & Ms. Shyamlima Borah, Advocates versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER1705.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is the second round of litigation which, unfortunately, and inevitably is, for reasons explained hereafter, going to lead to a third round of litigation.2. This appeal by the Assessee under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act 1961 ('Act') is directed against an order dated 28th October2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in IT(SS)A No.77/De1/2012 and IT(SS)A No.85/Del/2012 for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 and Block Period.3. Admit. ITA No.303 of 2017 Page 1 of 5 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the following question is framed for determination: Did the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...
Satya Narayan Sharma vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Arun Kumar @ Lucky vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Sushil Kumar vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Sorabh Gupta vs.central Bureau of Investigation Thr. Its Standing Coun ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h May, 2017 + W.P. (CRL.) 543/2013 and Crl.M.A. 4392/2013 SORABH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Shankar, Advocate versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THR. ITS STANDING COUNSEL .... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This petition presented under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeks to assail the order dated 10.11.2010 passed by the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM)-I of East District at Karkardooma Courts Complex on the file of the criminal case arising out of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. submitted by respondent Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on conclusion of investigation into crime registered by it vide RC No.RC/DST/2006/0004/CBI/STF/New Delhi. W.P. (Crl.) 543/2013 Page 1 of 8 2. It may be menti...
Bharat Bararia vs.priyanka Bararia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. h May, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 4936/2015 1.2.3. BHARAT BARARIA GEETA BARARIA YUVRAJ BARARIA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.B.N.Singhvi, Adv. versus 1. PRIYANKA BARARIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vineet Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Prateek Kumar and Mr.Vikramjeet Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioners invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to set aside the impugned orders dated 07th August, 2015 passed by the learned Special Judge (PC Act)-03: CBI, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in Criminal Appeal No.03 of 2015 and the interim maintenance order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 11th February, 2015 under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 CRL.M.C. 4936/2015 Page 1 of 9 (hereinafter referred to as the DV Act) in Complaint Case No.20...
M/S Eli Research India Pvt Ltd vs.mr Deepak Gupta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3447/2015 & I.A.Nos.4485/2016, 13603/2016, 422/2017 M/S ELI RESEARCH INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Prafulla Kumar Behera with Ms.Asmita Chaudhary, Mr.Rohit Rattu and Mr.Manish Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus MR DEEPAK GUPTA & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.A.B.Dial, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kunal Anand and Ms.Mani Mittla, Advocates for D-1. Mr.Shwetank Tripathi, Advocate for D-2. Mr.S.Chakraborty with Ms.Harshita Date of Decision :17. h May, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): I.A.Nos.25684/2015 & 4691/2016 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent and mandatory injunction against infringement or breach of contract dated 29th September, 2014, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of trust, delivery up, seeking damages and rendition of accounts of profits. I.A.Nos.25684/2015,4691/2016 in CS(OS) 3447/2015 Page 1 of 7 2. On 23rd December, 2015, the learned predecessor of this Court ...
Brina Gopal Traders Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * 22. + 23. + 24. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5424/2016 & CM225832016 (for stay) BINDLAS DUPLUX LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5425/2016 & CM225852016 (for stay) SWABHIMAN VYAPAAR PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5427/2016 & CM225892016 (for stay) BRINA GOPAL TRADERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, WP (C) Nos.5424; 5425; 5427 & ...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »