Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devi Charan vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Hari Om vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
National Highway Authority of India vs. Bel-Tbl (Joint Venture)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~7(Special Bench) * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h May, 2017 F.A.O. (OS) No.254/2016 & CM No.31958/2016 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Prashant Mehta & Ms.Vasundhra Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus BEL-TBL (JOINT VENTURE) ..... Respondent Through : Dr.Amit George, Mr.Swaroop George and Ms.Rajsree Ajay, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The appellant assails the order dated 08.07.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the objections of the appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the arbitral award dated 15.11.2013 were dismissed.2. The appellant had awarded the work to the respondent, by letter of intent No.11011/9/98-C-F/Karur Bypass dated 08.07.1999 for the contract value of `34,95,72,588/-. The contract was entered into on 30.08.1999 and the entire work was to be completed with...
Seema & Ors. Vs.om Pal Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SEEMA & ORS. FAO No.101/2017 17th May, 2017 Mr. S.N.Parashar, Advocate. ..... Appellants Through: versus OM PAL SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: R-1 in person. Mr. Advocate. Shoumik Mazumdar, CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the appellants/claimants against the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 7.3.2016 by which the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants has been dismissed.2. The facts of the case are that the deceased Sh. Ashok Tyagi was employed by the respondent no.1 herein as a driver for his bus bearing registration no.U.P-14 AT-0961. The bus used to ply on the prescribed route between Vivekanand Nagar and Ram Parasth at FAO No.101/2017 Page 1 of 9 Ghaziabad in U.P. In the claim petition the appellants/claimants pleaded that at ni...
Bikanerwala Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 10.2016 Pronounced on:17. 05.2017 ST. APPL.26/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. ST. APPL.27/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 10726/2006 GLAXO SMITH KLINE ASIA P. LTD. .Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran with Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Sh. Yogendra Aldak, Sh. Anshul Mathur and Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE ..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page...
Bindlas Duplux Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * 22. + 23. + 24. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5424/2016 & CM225832016 (for stay) BINDLAS DUPLUX LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5425/2016 & CM225852016 (for stay) SWABHIMAN VYAPAAR PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI-3 & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. WITH W.P.(C) 5427/2016 & CM225892016 (for stay) BRINA GOPAL TRADERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, WP (C) Nos.5424; 5425; 5427 & ...
Brij Mohan @ Shashi vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Vishnu Dayal Aggarwal vs.ndmc & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Akhtar Hussain vs.uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 * % + W.P.(C) 7462/2016 Date of Judgment:17. h May, 2017 ........ Petitioner AKHTAR HUSSAIN Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, states that they are opposing the present writ petition only on one ground. We may record, counsel for the respondents, on instructions, has not raised other objections or contentions which are so pleaded in the counter affidavit.2. Counsel for the respondents submits that for the purpose of Assured Career Progression Scheme, period of 12 and 24 years have to be counted from the date the petitioner-Akhtar Hussain was re-mustered as Constable (Driver) in 1992 and not from the date of initial joining as Constable (General Duty) in 1980.3. The petitioner-Akhtar Hussain was selected and enrolled ...
Kanungo Media (P) Ltd. Vs.rgv Film Factory & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h May, 2017. CS(COMM) 323/2017 (OLD No.CS(OS) 324/2007 KANUNGO MEDIA (P) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Meera Chature Sankhari and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advs. ..... Defendants Versus RGV FILM FACTORY & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. The plaintiff Kanungo Media Pvt. Ltd. on 20th February, 2007 instituted this suit to restrain the defendant No.1 RGV Film Factory, defendant No.2 Adlabs Films Ltd. and defendant No.3 Super Cassettes Ltd. (T-Series) from using the brand name and title NISHABD for their film on the ground of the same being deceptively similar to the film NISSHABD of the plaintiff and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit came up before this Court first on 21st February, 2007 when the counsel for the defendants No.1&2 appeared on caveat and accepted summons of the suit; since the film of the defendants was scheduled to be released on 2nd March, 2007, the application for interim in...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »