Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Glaxo Smith Kline Asia P. Ltd. Vs.assess. Auth. Special Zone Trade
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 10.2016 Pronounced on:17. 05.2017 ST. APPL.26/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. ST. APPL.27/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 10726/2006 GLAXO SMITH KLINE ASIA P. LTD. .Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran with Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Sh. Yogendra Aldak, Sh. Anshul Mathur and Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE ..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page...
Turner International India Pvt. Ltd vs.deputy Commissioner of Income T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4260/2015 $~ * 18 & 19 + TURNER INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi & Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE252), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel & Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel And W.P.(C) 4261/2015 TURNER INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi & Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE252), ..... Respondent NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel & Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR + WP(C) 4260 of 2015 & 4261 of 2015 Page 1 of 6 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1705.2017 1. The challenge in these writ petitions is to the Assessment Orders passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on 31s...
Harcharan Singh vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Rajesh Kumar vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~22 to 31, 33, 34, 36 to 39 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11115/2016 & CMs.APPL434502016 & 9910/2017 Date of Order:17. h May, 2017 DEVENDER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. + W.P.(C) 11190/2016 & CM.APPL437672016(stay) SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahoo with Mrs. S.B. Sahoo, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate for NDMC. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Sarojini Nagar Market Association. WP(C).11115/2016 etc...
Ram Krishan & Sons Charitable Trust vs.ilm Consulting Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 03.2017 Decided on :17. 05.2017 CS(COMM) 136/2016 & I.A. 13627/2013 RAM KRISHAN & SONS CHARITABLE TRUST Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Mittal, Advocate. versus ILM CONSULTING PVT LTD. .Defendant Through: Defendant is ex-parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The case of the plaintiff is that it is a registered Trust and is engaged in the field of providing educational services and running various Senior Secondary Schools, Management Institutes, Engineering College, Pharmacy College etc. The plaintiff set up a school in the year 1986 and a management institute by the name of Institute for Integrated Learning in Management i.e. IILM in the year 1993. That the plaintiff is very well known in the field of CS (COMM) 136/2016 Page 1 education and has a distinctive name and fame in that field. It has a registered trademark IILM and IILM Foundation and also logo of IILM Law School. It has been extensively using t...
Gurhardip Singh vs.harpreet Kaur and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) No.255/2016 Date of Decision:17. h May, 2017 GURHARDIP SINGH versus ..... Appellant Through Mr.Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms.Chandrika Gupta, Adv. HARPREET KAUR AND ORS Through Mr.G.S. Bhatia, Adv. for R-1 & LRs of R-2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI, J SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, impugns the order dated 19th November, 2015 passed in CS (OS) No.3410/2014 Gurhardip Singh Vs. Harpreet Kaur & Ors.2. The impugned order dated 19th November, 2015 was passed after an application for impleadment was filed by Gurjeet Singh Chawla & Guneet Kaur Chawla, respondent nos.3 & 4 respectively before us.3. In order to appreciate the controversy, we would like to note some facts. Respondent nos.3 & 4 had purportedly purchased second floor of Property No.WZ61 Guru Nanak Nagar, Main Road, Near CRPF Camp, New Delhi vide sale deed dated 15...
Mc Donalds India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of T&t
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 10.2016 Pronounced on:17. 05.2017 ST. APPL.26/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. ST. APPL.27/2013 MC DONALDS INDIA PVT. LTD. Appellant Through: Sh. Arvind. P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Sh. Rishabh Jaitley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 10726/2006 GLAXO SMITH KLINE ASIA P. LTD. .Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran with Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Sh. Yogendra Aldak, Sh. Anshul Mathur and Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE ..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page...
Tuncay Alankus Esq. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h May, 2017 + W.P. (CRL.) 1834/2016 and Crl.M.A.9529/2016, 9530/2016 TUNCAY ALANKUS ESQ. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bahar U. Barqi, Advocate with Mr. Mahmood Alam, Advocate versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. N.N. Ojha, Special Public Prosecutor and Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is a foreign national, who was extradited to India in October, 1997 in the context of proceedings of the criminal case arising out of the crime registered by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as RC3A)/96/CBI/ACU(1). On the basis of charge sheet filed on 26.12.1997, inter alia, involving offences punishable under Sections 120-B read with Sectionof the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and under Sectionsand 13(2) read with Section 13 (1) (c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act), the court of special judge t...
Ram @ Ram Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :17. h MAY, 2017 CRL.A. 1580/2013 RAM @ RAM KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate. STATE VERSUS Through : Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 29.05.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.48/2012 arising out of FIR No.374/1993 PS Trilok Puri whereby the appellant Ram @ Ram Kumar has been held guilty for committing offence punishable under SectionsIPC, he has preferred the instant appeal. By an order dated 03.06.2013, the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `2,000/- under Section 376 IPC and RI for five years with fine `1,000/- under Section 450 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Initially, charge-sheet was filed against the appellant for commission of offences punishable under Sections 450 and 376 IPC read with Section 511 IPC on the allegations tha...
Parul Homoeo Laboratory Pvt Ltd vs.royal Group
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
10 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1065/2015 & I.A. 8029/2015 AND123902015 PARUL HOMOEO LABORATORY PVT LTD Through: Mr. D.K. Yadav, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus ROYAL GROUP Through: Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate with Ms. Manjira Dasgupta, Advocate. ..... Defendant Date of Decision :17. h May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): I.A. 19506/2015 in CS(OS) 1065/2015 Present application has been filed by the defendant under Section 152 CPC for correction of typographical error. In the application, it has been averred that in the order dated 14th August, 2015, the turnover of the plaintiff has wrongly been recorded as Rs.33 lacs during the year 2015 instead of Rs.3,32,855/-. In view of the said averment, the present application is allowed. I.A. 19505/2015 in CS(OS) 1065/2015 1. Present application has been filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint. Page 1 of 8 CS (OS) 1065/2015 2. Ms. Shyel Treha...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »