Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shalu Saxena & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
MAC. APP. 327/2014 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. $~R-1 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Versus SHALU SAXENA & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h May, 2017 Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. ..... Appellant .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arvind Kr. Pandey, Adv. NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. The appellant has impugned the Award dated 31.01.2014 in MAC Petition No.626 of 2011 in favour of the LRs of the deceased i.e. respondent No.1 to 4. During the pendency of this appeal, R-1 passed away and is survived by his son R-4 and his parents R-2 and R-3. 70% of the share of his compensation was released to R-1 during his lifetime.2. The appellant contends that the amount awarded is on the higher side as the salary amount of Rs.82,633/- taken at the time of computing compensation was unsubstantiated; instead it should have been Rs.72,258/- after deducting certain allowances which were personal in nature to the deceased such as Rs. 7,350/- for petrol reimbursement, Rs....
Deepak Arora vs.m/s Motion Pictures Association
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3666/2017 and CM No.16129/2017 (Stay) DEEPAK ARORA Date of Decision:18. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Chandra Shekhar, Advocate versus M/S MOTION PICTURES ASSOCIATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Bhatia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. Arguments addressed on behalf of either side.2. The petitioner assails the impugned order dated 20th February, 2017 of the learned POLC-XVI in Old ID No.69/2013, new LIR No.5295/2016 whereby an application under Order XVIII Rule 17 r/w Section 151 CPC filed on behalf of the workman seeking recalling of MW-1 Sh. Jaidev Ghoshal, (the management witness) for cross-examination was declined.3. It is has been submitted on behalf of the workman that Mr.G.V. Gopinathan, the counsel for the workman due to his ailment and indisposition due to his suffering from a severe headache and fever could not appropriately cross-examine the W.P. (C) 3666/2017 Page 1 of ...
Mohd. Shakeel vs.the State (Gnct Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :4. h MAY, 2017 DECIDED ON :18. h MAY, 2017 + CRL.REV.P. 14/2017 MOHD. SHAKEEL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.S.N.Pandey, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GNCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner Mohd. Shakeel to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 09.12.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.54939/2016 whereby orders on conviction and sentence under Section 279/304A IPC in case FIR No.286/2000 at PS Kamla Market dated 09.12.2015 / 25.06.2016 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate was upheld.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as reflected in the charge- sheet were that on the night intervening 30/31.07.2000 at around 11.00 p.m. at Chowk Hamdard Asaf Ali Road in front of Police Booth, the petitioner was found driving blue-line bus No.DL-1P-6807 in a rash and negligent Crl...
The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.anil Mehra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 632/2006 THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anu Bagai, Mr. Himanshu Bagai and Ms. Akaashi Lodha, Advs. Versus ANIL MEHRA & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Setu Niket and Ms. Esha Majumdar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1805.2017 % IA No.4829/2017 (of D-2 for refund of monies paid to plaintiff) 1. The senior counsel for the plaintiff/non-applicant states that the written submissions on the application were filed in the Registry yesterday.2. The same are not on record.3. The senior counsel for the plaintiff has handed over a copy of the written submissions along with annexures in the Court and which are taken on record.4. The application has been heard. CS(OS) No.632/2006 Page 1 of 11 5. The plaintiff instituted this suit inter alia for permanent injunction restraining the defendant No.2 Radio Today Broadc...
The National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.sumitra Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~27 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h May, 2017 MAC.APP. 282/2017 & CM No.11119/2017 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P.Jain and Mr.Himanshu Gambhir, Advocates. Versus SUMITRA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar and Mr. Jai Prakash, Advocates with Respondent No.2 Mr. Mayank Sharma in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) The appellant impugns the award dated 30.01.2017 holding it liable to 1. pay the compensation amount (i.e. the insurer or the owner of the offending vehicle), the quantum of compensation also, is challenged. It is argued that the compensation granted towards non-pecuniary award, as under, is on the higher side. ........ Amount S. No.Head ..............1. Rs.25,000/- 2 For funeral expenses Rs. 1 lac 3 Loss of Consortium Rs. 1 lac 4 Loss of estate 5 Loss of Love and affection towards Children (1 lac X2 Rs. 2 lacs TOTAL Rs.4,25,000/- MAC.APP.Nos.282/ 2017 Page ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2) vs.vinita Chaurasia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~ * 4. + 5. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA10042015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-2) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus VINITA CHAURASIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates. AND ITA10052015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-2) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus VINITA CHAURASIA Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ITA Nos. 1004 of 2015 & 1005 of 2015 Page 1 of 14 % ORDER1805.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) by the Revenue directed against a common order dated 29th May, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA Nos. 3551/D...
National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2016 & CM337622016 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Appellant Through : Mr. S. Nandakumar with Ms. Tanupriya Gupta and Mr. Parvesh Singh, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate M/S BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER1805.2017 1. The appellant/NHAI is aggrieved by a common order dated 17.6.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.54/2015 and OMP No.1003/2013 whereunder, the objections filed by NHAI as a petitioner in both the petitions have been dismissed with an observation that there is no infirmity in the Award dated 28.8.2014, subsequently modified vide Award dated 29.8.2014 (subject matter of OMP No.54/2015).2. Learned counsel for the respondent states that aggrieved by the aforesaid common order dated 17.6.2016, the appellant/NHAI had filed two intra-court appeals, registered as FAO(OS)No....
Asha Malik vs.ram Naresh Dubey & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~24 & 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ASHA MALIK Date of Decision: May 18, 2017 CM(M) 413/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.N.M.Popli, Advocate with Mr.Sushil Ahlawat, Advocate and petitioner in person versus AND + RAM NARESH DUBEY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Hemant Payak, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person Mr.Naresh Kumar Beniwal, Advocate for R-4 & R-5 with R-4 & R-5 in person CM(M) 416/2017 ASHA MALIK AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.N.M.Popli, Advocate with Mr.Sushil Ahlawat, Advocate and petitioner No.1 in person. versus UMA SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Naresh Kumar Beniwal, Advocate with respondent in person CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM(M) 413/2017 & CM(M) 416/2017 1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30th CM(M) Nos.413 & 416 of 2017 Page 1 of 8 January, 2017 whereby the prayer made by the petition...
Sanoop Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~13. * + Date of decision:18. h May, 2017 ........ Petitioner SANOOP KUMAR Through Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.8102/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Prasanta Varma & Ms. Prativarani Varma, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The Staff Selection Commission has filed the counter affidavit. Union of India, Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, and DIGP (Recruitment), Regional Recruitment Centre, CRPF, New Delhi, have not filed their short counter affidavit.2. Notice in the writ petition was issued vide order dated 25th November, 2016. Sufficient time and opportunity has been given to the afore-stated respondents to file counter affidavit, and we are not inclined to grant and extend further time in view of the limited and short issue, which arises for consideration.3. Advertisement d...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ashma Begum and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.92/2017 and C.M. No.7161/2017 (stay) + % SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with 17th May, 2017 ASHMA BEGUM AND ORS. versus Mr. Junaidullah, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 8. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is filed by the appellant/insurance company impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 30.12.2016 by which the Employees Compensation Commissioner has allowed the claim petition filed before him by the respondent nos.1 to 8 herein. The Employees Compensation Commissioner by the impugned judgment has awarded compensation to the respondent nos.1 to 8 on account of death of Mohd. Sarif and who was the late husb...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »