Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Umesh Kumar Chauhan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h May, 2017 Decided on:18. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 460/2015 UMESH KUMAR CHAUHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Ms. Namita Wali and Mr. Akshay Sehgal, Advocates. versus STATE CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. ..... Respondent MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Umesh challenges the impugned judgment dated 26th August, 2014 and the order on sentence dated 29th August, 2014 awarding him imprisonment for life.2. Learned counsel for the appellant Umesh contends that even as per the version of PW-6 Naresh Gupta, husband of the deceased, Umesh and the juvenile had worked with him only for 15 to 18 days and half the salary for that period had already been given. Thus the only dispute related to a sum of 300/- and no reasonable person would commit a murder for a sum of 300/- ...
Pankaj Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3847/2016 % PANKAJ KUMAR versus Date of Judgment:18. h May, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. with Ms.Debashree Mukherjee, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Jitendra K. Tripathi, Adv. for UOI. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner-Pankaj Kumar, an OBC candidate and domicile of the state of Bihar, had participated in the selection process conducted by Staff Selection Commission in 2012 for appointment to the post of Constable (General Duty) in Central Armed Police Forces and Rifleman (General Duty) in Assam Rifles.2. The petitioner had, admittedly, not given option in his application form as to which Central Armed Police Force i.e. Border Security Force; Central Industrial Security Force; Central Reserve WP (C) No.3847/2016 Page 1 of 10 Police Force; Sashastra Seema Bal or alternat...
Tejinder Singh & Anr. Vs.state Thr. Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$ 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :18. h May, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 1674/2012 TEJINDER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Rebecca John, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kushdeep Gaur, Mr. Harsh Bora & Mr. Nikhil Ranjan Ahuja, Advs. versus STATE THR. NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On 29.9.1981, Flight No.IC-423 of Indian Airlines had taken off from New Delhi for Srinagar enroute Amritsar. Midair, it is stated, the petitioners herein with some other associates hijacked the aeroplane. The aircraft eventually landed in Lahore (Pakistan) where after a commando operation, the passengers and the crew were rescued and the petitioners with their associates detained.2. On the report of Mr. G.S. Diwan, Chief Security Officer, Palam Airport, first information report (FIR) No.105/1981 had been registered and taken up for investigation by police station Palam at W.P(crl.) 1674/2012 Page 1 o...
Sumittra Ray & Ors. Vs.nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MAY18 2017 CRL.M.C. 4255/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.177SUMITTRA RAY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Bijan Ghosh, Advocate with Mr.P.Jegan, Advocate. VERSUS NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Mr.Ashok Singh, Advocate for R2. + S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of Complaint Case No.27/DV/2015 filed by respondent No.2 against them under Sections 12(1), 18, 20 and 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as D.V.Act). The petition is contested by the complainant/respondent No.2.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Undisputedly, the petitioner No.4 was married to respondent No.2 on 27.1.2005. No child was born out of this wedlock. Crl.M.C.4255/2016 Page 1 of 4 3. It is informed that respondent No.2 ...
Imran Abdulla Syed vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h APRIL, 2017 DECIDED ON :18. h MAY, 2017 + CRL.A. 611/2013 & CRL.M.B. 935/2013 IMRAN ABDULLA SYED Through : Mr.Vipul Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms.Garima S.Yadav, Mr.Philomon Kani & Ms.Kriti Handa, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present appeal is directed to impugn the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 07.01.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.04/2011 arising out of FIR-RC-SIJ-2010 E0006 PS CBI/EOU- VI/New Delhi by which the appellant was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 489B/489C IPC. By an order dated 10.01.2013, he was awarded various prison terms with fine. The sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 30.08.2010, the appellant was found in possession of Fake Crl.A.611...
Asha Malik and Anr vs.uma Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~24 & 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ASHA MALIK Date of Decision: May 18, 2017 CM(M) 413/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.N.M.Popli, Advocate with Mr.Sushil Ahlawat, Advocate and petitioner in person versus AND + RAM NARESH DUBEY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Hemant Payak, Advocate for R-1 with R-1 in person Mr.Naresh Kumar Beniwal, Advocate for R-4 & R-5 with R-4 & R-5 in person CM(M) 416/2017 ASHA MALIK AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.N.M.Popli, Advocate with Mr.Sushil Ahlawat, Advocate and petitioner No.1 in person. versus UMA SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Naresh Kumar Beniwal, Advocate with respondent in person CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM(M) 413/2017 & CM(M) 416/2017 1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30th CM(M) Nos.413 & 416 of 2017 Page 1 of 8 January, 2017 whereby the prayer made by the petition...
Narender Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$ R-5 & 6. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :18. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 431/2006 NARENDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M. Shamikh, Mr. Anurag Andley & Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advs. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP STATE * + + CRL.A. 451/2006 SURMAN @ SURBHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M. Shamikh, Mr. Anurag Andley & Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On 4.6.1997 first information report (FIR) No.24/1997 (Ex.PW-10/C) was registered in anti corruption branch (ACB) of Crl.A Nos. 431 and 451 of 2006 Page 1 of 12 National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi) on the basis of complaint (Ex.PW-7/A) of Ram Kumar (PW-7) and the action taken thereupon by Inspector Satbir Singh (PW-11) of ACB. On conclusion of investigation into the said FIR, a report under Section 173 of the Code of C...
Director of Income Tax International Taxation-Ii vs.rolls Royce Indust ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~1 to 3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA10582011 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-II ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing Counsel versus ROLLS ROYCE INDUSTRIAL POWER INDIA LTD.....Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Mayank Negi & Mr. Arth Taran Panda, Advocates + WITH ITA10612011 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-II ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing Counsel versus ROLLS ROYCE INDUSTRIAL POWER INDIA LTD.... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Mayank Negi & Mr. Arth Taran Panda, Advocates AND ITA Nos.1058/2011, 1061/2011 & 1063/2011 Page 1 of 11 + ITA10632011 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-II ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing versus Counsel ROLLS ROYCE INDUSTRIAL POWER INDIA LTD.... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Mayank Negi & ...
Moddus Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s. Scone Exhibition Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA4972017 % Date of Judgment:18. h May, 2017 MODDUS MEDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, & Mr. I.M. Singh, Advocate. versus M/s. SCONE EXHIBITION PVT. LTD. Through: None. ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CM No.18654/2017 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) This is an application for condonation of 101 days delay in re-filing the appeal. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. CM No.18652/2017 (for condonation of delay in filing the appeal) 1. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for condonation of 400 days delay in filing the appeal against the impugned judgment RFA4972017 Page 1 of 13 and decree dated 31.08.2015 passed by the lear...
Ved Pal and Anr vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-2017
$~9&10 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 8982/2016 Date of decision :18. h May, 2017 VED PAL AND ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anju Jain and Mr. Hitesh Sachar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Surender Kumar and Mr. Satya Prakash Singh, Advs.for R-1/UOI Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, MR. Prateek Gupta and Mohd. Danish, Advs.for R-3/FSSAI Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv.for GNCTD. + W.P.(C) 2166/2017 COMMUNITY AGAINST DRUNKEN DRIVING Through: Mr. Angad Mehta, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1/UOI W.P.(C) Nos. 8982/2016 & 2166/2017 Page 1 of 7 Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, MR. Prateek Gupta and Mohd. Danish, Advs.for R-3/FSSAI Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv.for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL,...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »