Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Subrahmanya Kallage vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :19. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 4337/2017 RAJESH SUBRAHMANYA KALLAGE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Adv with Mr.Sagar Saxena, Ms. Himanshi Saini and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.643/2017. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has dismissed the original application of the petitioner as being barred by limitation. Consequently, the Tribunal has not examined the merits of the petitioners claim.2. The petitioner appeared in the Indian Forest Service Examination, 2000 (IFSE). He was selected by the UPSC and allocated Nagaland cadre. The cadre allocation of IFS probationers of 2001 batch was notified contemporaneously. Consequent u...
Manik Chopra vs.priyanka Chopra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :19. h MAY, 2017 $~42 * + CRL.M.C.1149/2016, CRL.M.A.Nos.4943/2016 & 6535/2016 MANIK CHOPRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.K.K.Manan, Sr.Advocate with versus PRIYANKA CHOPRA Ms.Shweta Sain, Mr.Ankush Narang & Mr.A.Bhagat, Advocates. Through : Mr.Sandeep Saini, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 29.01.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.6/2015 whereby order dated 05.11.2014 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate granting interim maintenance to the respondent @ `60,000/- per month was upheld. Petition is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Relationship between the parties is not in dispute. No material has emerged to find out if despite having professional qualifica...
Gujarat State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited vs.national Agr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS)(COMM) 80/2017 Date of decision:19. h May, 2017 GUJARAT STATE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar with Ms. NATIONAL AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Liza M Baruah, Advocates The impugned order dated 30.09.2016 dismisses objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging the arbitration award dated 15.04.2016 filed by the appellantGujarat State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited.2. The appellant has raised three contentions. The appellant had procured and supplied cotton seeds to the National Agriculture Cooperative Marketing Federation (NAFED) on or before 06.07.2009 and, therefore, could not have ensured compliance with the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) norms...
Sharwan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h January, 2017 Decided on:19. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 73/2016 SHARWAN STATE Represented by: Mr. Yogendra Verma, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA SI Santosh PS Tilak Nagar.1. Sharwan challenges the impugned judgment dated 21st December, 2015 convicting him for offences punishable under Section 363/366/376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 22nd December, 2015 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `1,000/- for offence punishable under Section 363 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 366 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant submits that ...
Mohan Lal Sehjpal vs.state (Through c.b.i) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
$~48 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 4373/2017 MOHAN LAL SEHJPAL versus STATE (THROUGH C.B.I) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Amit Saxena, Advocates Mr Anupam Sharma and Ms Aditi Rath, Advocates for CBI. Mr Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.19123/2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4373/2017 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to Respondent No.1 CBI as well as the respondent No.2 Regional Passport Officer, Chandigarh to release the passport of the petitioner seized vide seizure memo dated 03.03.2014 in complaint case No.RC.BD1/2014/E/2004, P.S.:CBI/BS&FC/New Delhi under Section 120- B r/w.409/411/420/467/468/471/474 IPC titled as State (CBI) vs Nirmal WP(C) 4373/2017 Page 1 of 5 Singh Bh...
Mahendra Kumar Malhotra vs.vindvasini and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
$~47 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h May, 2017 FAO1752016 & CM No.15117/2016 MAHENDRA KUMAR MALHOTRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Pallav Gupta, Advs. versus VINDVASINI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput, Mr. Vikram Mathur and Mr. Rajender Pratap, Advs. for R1 and R2. Respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order of the Commissioner, Employees Compensation whereby compensation of Rs.8,54,280/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 and 2.2. On 25th April, 2015, Roshan was working on the grinding machine for laying the stone/marble on the floors in respect of the appellants property. Roshan suffered a electric shock from the grinding machine which resulted in fatal injuries. The police registered FIR No.238 dated 25th April, 2015 under Section 304-A IPC and filed the chargesheet against the contractor and owner of the property. The appell...
Pavinder Ahluwalia vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h January, 2017 Decided on:19. h May, 2017 CRL.M.C. 99/2012 PAVINDER AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. Represented by: In person. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Madhurendra Kumar, PS EOW. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Adv. for R-2. Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhary, Adv. for R-3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Pavinder Ahluwalia, the petitioner S/o late Brig. Ajit Singh Ahluwalia and Smt. Charanjeet Ahluwalia on 2nd January, 1998 lodged FIR No.10/1998 at PS Defence Colony for offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC. After investigation, a charge sheet was filed whereafter on hearing the accused and the State vide the order dated 23rd April, 2004 learned Metropolitan Magistrate discharged all the seven accused i.e. Ashok Bhaduria, Prashant Bhaduria, R.C. Goel, Nand Kishore Bindra, R.L. Kapoor, Lt. Col. (Retd.) T.M. Singh and S...
Judge Kumar @ Deepak vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MAY02 2017 DECIDED ON : MAY19 2017 + CRL.A. 443/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.71JUDGE KUMAR @ DEEPAK Through : Mr.P.R.Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr.Y.R.Sharma & Mr.Arun Srivastava, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ..... Respondent S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 18.04.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.204/2013 arising out of FIR No.256/2013 at Police Station K.N.K. Marg whereby the appellant Judge Kumar @ Deepak was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 10 of POCSO Act and Section 506 IPC. By an order dated 22.04.2016, he was awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with fine `5,000/- for offence under Section 10 POCSO Act; Rigorous Imprisonment Crl.A.443/2016 Page 1 of 7 for one year with fine `3,000/- for offence under Section 506 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate con...
Ravinandani and Anr vs.raja Prem Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
$~23 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS)No.157/2017& CM Nos.18971-973/2017 Date of decision :19. h May, 2017 RAVINANDANI AND ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Rohan Thawani and Mr. Anand, Advs. versus Through : None. RAJA PREM SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT (ORAL) ..... Respondent GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.18973/2017 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.18971/2017 (Delay) 1. We have heard ld. counsel for the parties on this application.2. We are satisfied that the appellants have adequately explained the circumstances in which the delay of 11 days in filing this appeal has occasioned. The delay of 11 days in filing the appeal is condoned.3. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 157/2017 Page 1 of 8 FAO(OS) 157/2017 1. The appellant assails the order dated 10th March, 2017 whereby the ld. Single Judge has rejected I.A.No.3067/2017 filed by...
Srikant Jain vs.state Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h April, 2017 Decided on:19. h May, 2017 CRL.M.C. 3482/2011 & Crl.M.A. 5897/2017 (stay) SRIKANT JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arun Srivastava, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advs. versus STATE THR. CBI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA with Mr. Manoj Pant, Adv.1. Challenging the impugned order dated 7th October, 2011 dismissing the application of the petitioner seeking directions for sending back the trial to the court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) Delhi, the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. A brief background of the case before coming to the issue involved in the present petition is that RC No.3/81/CIU(A) was registered by the CBI for offences punishable under Sections 120B/380/411/414 IPC and Section 25(2) read with Section 14(3) of the Antiquities & Art Treasurer Act, 1972 (in sho...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »