Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hompal Singh & Ors. Vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Appeal No.661/2001 Date of Decision:22. d May, 2017 HOMPAL SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr.R.M.Tufail, Mr.Farooq Chaudhary, Mr.Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Ms.Meenakshi Joshi and Ms.Astha, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI .. Respondent Through Mr.Akshai Malik, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. against judgment and order on sentence dated 06.09.2001 whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted for an offence punishable under Section 304B IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years each.2. The facts of the case, as per the case of the prosecution, in a nutshell are that on 01.09.1995 an intimation was received Crl.Appeal No.661/2001 Page1 of 13 vide DD No.15A at 8.45 P.M. that one lady by the name of Rita had been admitted in the GTB hospital in an unconscious condition. The said DD was marked to SI Sher Singh who proceeded to t...
Rahul @ Moni vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1141/2015 Judgment reserved on 4th May, 2017 Judgment pronounced on 22nd May, 2017 RAHUL @ MONI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. STATE versus Through : AND Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1219/2015 MANISH ALIAS AALOO ..... Appellant Through : Attendance slip not given. Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas AND CRL.A. 161/2016 PANKAJ STATE ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. versus Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI ..... Respondent AND Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas CRL.A. 1141/2015 Page 1 of 16 + CRL.A. 430/2016 RAHUL @ CHONCHU ..... Appellant Through : Mr. S. B. Dandapani, Adv. STATE versus Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI ..... Respondent Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 18th Septemb...
Manish Alias Aaloo vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1219/2015 MANISH ALIAS AALOO ..... Appellant Through : Attendance slip not given. Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.For judgment see Crl.A.No.1141/2015 decided on 22nd May, 2017. MAY22 2017 ga A.K. PATHAK, J....
Akum Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
$~ * 22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6448/2016 AKUM DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED THROUGH: DIRECTOR SHRI. SANJEEV JAIN Through: Mr Arvind Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2205.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is a writ petition preferred by the... Petitioner challenging the reopening by the Revenue of the assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 by invoking Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1969 (the Act) and issuing the impugned notice dated 6th May 2015. Also challenged is the order dated 17th June 2016 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) rejecting the... Petitioner' objections to the reopening.2. It is required to be noted at the outset that the original return filed for the AY in question was picked up for scrutiny by the AO and ...
Anish Arya vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
20 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 54/2015 ANISH ARYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunav Tewari, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS Date of Decision :22. d May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate/letter of Administration in respect of Will dated 28th May, 2001 of the deceased Mr. Ashok Arya.2. It has been averred in the petition that the petitioner is the son of the deceased Mr. Ashok Arya, who expired on 28th March, 2014. The deceased is stated to have executed a registered Will dated 28th May, 2001, which was duly attested by Mr. Arvind Arya and Major (Retd.) Suneal Malik, Advocate. The Will dated 28th May 2001 executed by the deceased is reproduced hereinbelow:-"TEST.CAS. 54/2015 Page 1 of 6 WILL THIS is the last will and testament of...
State Nct of Delhi vs.ghasita Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h MAY, 2017 DECIDED ON :22. d MAY, 2017 + CRL.A.540/2014 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. versus GHASITA KHAN ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mayank Jain, Advocate with Ms.Madhu Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. State has preferred the instant appeal under Section 377 Cr.P.C. to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 01.11.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.36/2013 arising out of FIR No.407/2012 PS Shahdara by which the respondent was released on probation for a period of three years for commission of offence punishable under Section 8 POCSO Act. The appeal is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Learned APP urged that considering the gravity of the offence and serious allegations against the respondent, the Trial Court committed grave error to release the r...
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.savita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 & 14 * % + MAC.APP. 651/2016 & CM Nos. 30355, 30357 & 34590/2016 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Decided on:22. h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mrs. Suman Bagga and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates. SAVITA & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. MAC.APP. 683/2016 & CM Nos. 31477 & 31479/2016 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + ..... Appellant Through: Mrs. Suman Bagga and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI SAVITA & ORS. Versus NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. These appeals under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 impugn the common Award dated 29.01.2016 passed in Suit No.2and MAC.APP.Nos.651 & 683 of 2016 Page 1 of 4 2awarding compensation of Rs.11,37,567.60/- and Rs.3,25,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum to the beneficiaries of the Award respec...
Brahm Prakash & Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 22, 2017 CRL.A.306/2001 PRADIP YADAV & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Varun Deswal, Adv., Mr.S.S. Yadav, Adv., Mr.Aditya Singh, Adv. & Mr.Dhananjay, Adv. for appellant No.1/Pradip Yadav. Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Adv., Ms.Ruchira Mr.Dhananjay Arora, Adv., Mehlawat, for appellant Adv. No.2/Rajesh Yadav. versus STATE Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 307/2001 BRAHM PRAKASH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankush Narang, Adv., Ms.Anjali Rajput, Adv., Ms.Shweta Sain, Adv. & Ms.Devyani Khosla, Adv. for Appellant Brahm Prakash. Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Adv., Ms.Ruchira Arora, Mr.Dhananjay Mehlawat, Adv. for appellant No.2/Jagdish. Adv., STATE versus Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional ..... Respondent Crl. A. Nos.306/2001 & 307/2001 Page 1 ...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 vs.amadeus India Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 & 3 * + PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-1 ITA1542017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate. versus AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. WITH + THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ITA3302017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia & Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocates. versus INTER GLOBE TECHNOLOGY QUOTIENT PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Vohra, Advocate. CORAM: % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2205.2017 1. These are two appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the ITA Nos.154/2017 & 330/2017 Page 1 of 22 Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) which raise similar issues concerning the interpretation of Section 10A and Section 10AA of the Act.2. ITA No.154/2017 is directed against an order dated 21st August, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1804/Del/2014 for the...
Pankaj vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 161/2016 PANKAJ STATE Through : Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI ..... Respondent Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.For judgment see Crl.A.No.1141/2015 decided on 22nd May, 2017. MAY22 2017 ga A.K. PATHAK, J....
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »