Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamaljeet vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~37 * % + STATE CORAM: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:23. d May, 2017 CRL. A. 453/2013 KAMALJEET Through : Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Ms. Namita ..... Appellant Wali and Mr. Akshay Sehgal, Advocates versus Through : Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) filed against the judgment dated 31.03.2012 by which the appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable under Sectionof the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and order on sentence dated 08.06.2012 by which the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The appellant also stands convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for an offence punishable under Section 201 of IPC with a fine of Rs.1...
Sheela Sharma vs.mahendra Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d May, 2017 CRL.A. 798/2016 SHEELA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Dwedi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus MAHENDRA PAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Kundra, Advocate with Mr. Vivek Shokeen, Advocate along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondent was prosecuted by the appellant by criminal complaint no.375/01/2011 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on the ground that he having taken a friendly loan of Rs.10 lacs from her sometime around October, 2008 and having assured repayment after 24 months, had issued a cheque on 21.07.2011 for a sum of Rs.10 lacs in her favour which upon presentation was returned unpaid by the bank with remarks funds insufficient and in spite of notice of demand dated 23.08.2011 sent on 01.09.2011, he had failed to make any payment.2. The case was contested by the respon...
National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d May, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4447/2017 NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS & ORS ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Mathews J.Medumpara and Mr. A.C. Philip, For the Respondent : Advs. Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Adv./Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv. for R-4/Delhi Police CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2205.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners by the present petition seek a direction to the State of Arunachal Pradesh, its police, Delhi Police, West Bengal WP(C) 4447/2017 Page 1 of 9 Police and the Central Bureau of Investigation to register an FIR based on the allegations contained in the alleged suicide note of its late Chief Minister Kalikho Pul. F...
The Vishwa Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs.govt of Nct of De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
$~2 * + W.P.(C) 3578/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner THE VISHWA COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. Through: Mr. Saurabh Sharma and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC for GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Gulshan Ahuja, Assistant Registrar (SCC-08) O/o Registrar Co-op. Socities, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Pursuant to the order dated 25.04.2017, learned counsel for the ORDER2205.2017 % 1. GNCTD enters appearance and states that he does not propose to file a counter affidavit and is ready with arguments. He draws our attention to the order dated 18.08.2015, passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, Delhi whereunder the appeal filed by the petitioner/Society came to be dismissed for non-prosecution with an observation that out of 10 dates when the said appeal was listed, the Society was represented only twice and counsel for the S...
Kamal Lal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 22, 2017 CRL.A. 831/2001 KAMAL LAL Through: Mr.Mukesh Kaushik, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the ..... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT By this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., P.S.TEJI, J.1. the appellant seeks to challenge the impugned judgment dated 16.10.2001, passed in SC No.296/1997 in a case registered as FIR No.83/1992 under Section 489-B/34 of IPC, at Police Station Greater Kailash, Delhi whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 489C IPC and order on sentence dated 16.10.2011 vide which he has been awarded the rigorous imprisonment for a period 3 years and fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months. Crl. A. No.831/2001 Page 1 of 8 2. The facts emerging from the record are that on 10.04.1992, accused Daya Nand came to a petrol pump while driving his c...
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs.inter Globe Technology Q ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 & 3 * + PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-1 ITA1542017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate. versus AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate. WITH + THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ITA3302017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia & Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocates. versus INTER GLOBE TECHNOLOGY QUOTIENT PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Vohra, Advocate. CORAM: % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2205.2017 1. These are two appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the ITA Nos.154/2017 & 330/2017 Page 1 of 22 Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) which raise similar issues concerning the interpretation of Section 10A and Section 10AA of the Act.2. ITA No.154/2017 is directed against an order dated 21st August, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1804/Del/2014 for the...
Rahul @ Chonchu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 430/2016 RAHUL @ CHONCHU Through : Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Adv. ..... Appellant STATE Versus Through : Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with ASI ..... Respondent Jaiveer Singh, P.S. K. Khas CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.For judgment see Crl.A.No.1141/2015 decided on 22nd May, 2017. MAY22 2017 ga A.K. PATHAK, J....
Rambeer Shokeen vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on: May 03, 2017 Pronounced on: May 22, 2017 Crl.A. 311/2017 & Crl.M.(Bail) 525/2017 RAMBEER SHOKEEN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Adv. with R.H.A. Sikander & Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advs. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Addl. the Standing Counsel for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The appellant was arrested on 1.12.2016 during investigation of the first information report (FIR) 10/2015 of police station Special Cell, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, as extended to Delhi (MCOCA, for short) and came to be remanded to custody by orders of an additional sessions judge who had been appointed as the presiding officer of the Special Court under MCOCA in terms of Section 5, such custody having been extended from time to time. By the criminal appeal at hand, presented under Sections 12 MCOCA, a...
Mr. Shammi Narang & Anr vs.pindrop Music App Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :16.05.2017 Judgment delivered on :22. 05.2017 CS(COMM) 271/2017 MR. SHAMMI NARANG & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Giriraj Subramanium and Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Advs. versus PINDROP MUSIC APP PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Mr.Vaibhav Gaggar and Mr.Shiv Johar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A. No.4482/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code) & I.A. No.5744/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code) in CS(COMM) 271/2017 1 There are two plaintiffs before this Court. Plaintiff No.1 is the sole proprietor of M/s Studio Pindrop. Plaintiff No.2 is a limited liability partnership firm. One of its partners is the son of plaintiff No.1. Plaintiff CS (COMM) 271/2017 Page 1 of 16 No.1 adopted the trademark PINDROP in the year 1998 by starting operations in his studio PINDROP which is one of first digital recording studios in the country. It applied for registration of ...
S P Mangla vs.sushil Kumar Saxena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 162/2014 S P MANGLA Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate. Reserved on :03. d May, 2017 Date of Decision:22. d May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 04th March, 2013 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA5682010.2. Mr. S.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner, who is around 73 years of age, was being harassed on account of non-payment of pension and pensionary benefits in spite of clear cut directions in a Division Bench judgment dated 4th March, 2013.3. He stated that the petitioner while working as Deputy Director was charge sheeted for major penalty proceedings in 1984 and thereupon, the petitioner was dismissed vide the order dated 20th June, 1986. CONT....
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »