Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sohan Lal & Anr. Vs.mohan Lal Khattar (Deceaesed) Thr. Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 23, 2017 + RC.Rev.560/2016 SOHAN LAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ch.Ranjit Singh & Mr.Kapil Anand, Advocates. versus MOHAN LAL KHATTAR (DECEAESED) THR. LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.K.Garg, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Sudhir Naagar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) CM No.43975/2016 1. For the reasons stated in the application, 105 days delay in filing the petition is condoned.2. Application is disposed of. RC.Rev.No.560/2016 1. The petitioners, who have been residing as tenant in property No.3808, Ram Nath Patwa Street, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055 (privately numbered as 3808/2, Ram Nath Patwa Street, Paharganj, New Delhi- 110055), have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section RC.Rev.560/2016 Page 1 of 9 25(B) (8) of Delhi Rent Control Act assailing the order dated 5th March, 2016 whereby the learned Rent Controller, while dismissing the appli...
The National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.javitri Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d May, 2017 MAC.APP. 378/2017 & CM No.14657/2017 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. S.P. Jain and Mr.Himanshu Gambhir, Advocates. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS. Pavitra Mohan Sharma and Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.5 and 6. MAC.APP. 379/2017 & CM No.14659/2017 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Jain and Mr.Himanshu Gambhir, Advocates. Versus SAVITRI DEVI & ORS. $~19 & 20 * % + + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JAVITRI DEVI & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS. Pavitra Mohan Sharma and Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.5 and 6. MAC.APP.Nos.378 & 379/ 2017 Page 1 of 6 NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. These appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 impugn the common Award dated 19.01.2017 passed in MACP No.and ...
Indure Private Limited vs.heidelberg Cement Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 05.2017 CS(COMM) 1124/2016 INDURE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate and Mr Prashant Mehta and Mr Gaurav Malik, Advs. versus HEIDELBERG CEMENT LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Soli J.Sorabjee, Sr. Advocate with Mr Krishnendu Datta, Mr Ajay Goyal, Mr Bikash Mohanty, Mr Amit K. Singh and Mr Shantanu, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT IA Nos. 16649/2013 (O. 39 R. 1 and 2 CPC) 1. This order shall dispose of the IA No.16649/2013 (O. 39 R. 1 and 2 CPC) of the plaintiff. The defendants filed the reply and sought vacation of the interim stay dated 19.102013.2. In this application, the plaintiff has prayed for the stay of invocation of the bank guarantee. CS (COMM) 1124/2016 Page 1 3. The admitted facts of the case are that the plaintiff and the defendant had executed a Letter of Intent (LoI) dated 25.01.2013. Subsequently, an agreement dated 20.02.2013 was enter...
Ritula Seth vs.registrar Co Operative Societies and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~1 & 2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4153/2017 & W.P.(C) 4164/2017 1. RITULA SETH ROHIT BHARGAVA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. C.A. Sinha, Advocate versus REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS Through : Mr. Vikas Shokeen, Advocate for R-1/RCS. Ms. Monika Tripathy Pandey, Adv. for R-2/DDA. Mr. Apar Gupta, Advocate for R-3/Society. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2305.2017 The petitioners have filed the present petitions for issuing a writ of mandamus to the respondent No.1/Registrar, Cooperative Societies directing him to forward their names in the list of verified members for conducting a draw of lots for allotment of flats in the respondent No.3/Society, after the concurrence of the respondent No.2/DDA.2. On the last date of hearing, counsel for the respondent No.1/RCS was directed to obtain instructions from the department. Today, he states that he has obtai...
Srishti vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved:12. 04.2017 Judgment Pronounced:23. 5.2017 + W.P.(C) 10392 OF2016SRISHTI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. Arab Singh, Advocate for GNCTD. :1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.: JUDGMENT The petitioner Ms. Srishti d/o Sh. Mukesh Gupta worked as a Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) (English) teacher on contractual basis in the schools of the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) scheme, the details of which are as under:-"Sl. No.Appointment letter School / Agreement (i) Appointment letter / Agreement dated 03.09.2012 SKV, Aya Nagar, New Delhi - 110047 (School I.D.-1923063) Period and rate of remuneration w.e.f. 01.09.2012 31.03.2013 consolidated remuneration at to a of W.P.(C) No.10392/2016 Page 1 of 42 (ii) Ap...
Deputy Commandant Kuldeep J Choudry vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~25. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.429/2016 Date of decision:23. d May, 2017 DEPUTY COMMANDANT KULDEEP J CHOUDRY........ Petitioner Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Commandant in the Border Security Force on 6th January, 2003.2. The petitioner alongwith his batchmates and others was considered for promotion for Deputy Commandant in the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meeting held on 23rd September, 2009.3. The petitioner was not promoted because of below the benchmark grading in his Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the year 2007-08 (1st April, 2007 to 31st March, 2008).4. The petitioner protested and made representation to the respondents relying up...
Sonu Singh vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$ 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :23. d May, 2017 + CRL.A. 471/2006 SONU SINGH Through: Mr. Rajender Chhabra & Mr. ..... Appellant Rajiv Gupta, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Deepak Panwar, PS Defence Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant was summoned and put on trial in Sessions case No.29/2004, along with another accused (Bijender @ Biju) on the basis of report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.181/2004 of police station Defence Colony, by chargesheet dated 2.9.2004 for offences under Sections 392 and 397 read with Section 34 IPC, the gravamen thereof being that on 6.4.2004 at about 8.30 p.m. in B Block, Defence Colony market within the jurisdiction of the said police station, he in furtherance of his common intention with the said co-ac...
Louis Vuitton vs.gaurav Bhatia & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 05.2017 CS(COMM) 89/2017 and IA Nos. 13470/2014 & 21815/2014 LOUIS VUITTON ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita Patro and Mr Shamim Nooreyezdan, Advs. versus GAURAV BHATIA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Defendants are ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the defendants, restraining them from infringing its trademark, copyright and also from passing off the goods of the plaintiff as that of theirs and for rendition of accounts and damages.2. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that it is registered company existing under the laws of France and having its registered office at 2, rues du Pont-Neuf, 75001- Paris, France. Col. J.K. Sharma (Retired) is the authorized person representing the plaintiff under a Power of Attorney. It is submitted that the plaintiff-company was founded by Mr Loui...
Bucon Engineers & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Appellate Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 3695/2017 & CM No.16271/2017 BUCON ENGINEERS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS) GAIL GAS LTD. & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ....... RESPONDENTS For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Deepak Dhingra with Mr. Natwar Rai, Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats and Ms. Shnivangi Singh, Advocates. Ms. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Mr. D.K. Singh and Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2305.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 3695/2017 & CM No.16271/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 30.01.2017, whereby the Appellate Authority of the respondent has rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner.2. Perusal of order dated 30.01.2017 shows that the Appellate Authority has merely noticed the averments in the show cause notice, WP(C) 3695/...
Lata vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : MAY23 2017. CRL.A. 703/2003 Through None. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Gupta, APP LATA STATE SI Naresh Kumar PS-Kamla Market CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 19.08.2003 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.30/2002 arising out of FIR No.461/2001 at Police Station Kamla Market whereby the appellant was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 368 read with SectionsIPC and Section 3, 4 & 5 ITP Act; the instant appeal has been preferred by her. By an order dated 23.8.2003, she was awarded various prison terms; maximum being Rigorous Imprisonment for eight years with fine `5,000/- under Section 373 IPC. All the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on a raid by police at Kotha No.70, G.B.Road, Delhi, four girls including one X(assumed name) Crl.A.703/2003 Page ...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »