Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Jyoti Store vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~38 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4524/2017 Judgment delivered on:24. 05.2017 M/S JYOTI STORE ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS : versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr Yogesh Kumar : Mr. Akshay Choudhary, Advocate for Mr. Raman Duggal. JUDGMENT2405.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.19759/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4524/2017 & CM No.19758/2017 (for directions) 1. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing today. The petitioner impugns Suspension-Cum-Show-Cause Notice dated 13.10.2016, whereby the Fair Price Shop License issued to the petitioner has been suspended. W.P.(C) No.4524 /2017 Page 1 of 6 2. The petitioner was issued an authorization to run a Fair Price Shop (FPS) under the name and style of M/s. Jyoti Store by the Department of Food and Suppl...
Swadeep Kumar vs.allahabad Bank & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~20. * + % LPA1952017 SWADEEP KUMAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 05.2017 ..... Appellant Through: Md. Azam Ansari, Advocate versus ALLAHABAD BANK & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gautam, Advocate with Mr. Anant Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocate for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM Appln. No.10798/2017 1.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA No.195/2017 and CM Appln. No.10800/2017 3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondents. LPA1952017 Page 1 of 8 4. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to dispose of the present Letters Patent Appeal.5. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20.12.2016 rendered by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (C) No.8470/2016. By the impugned judgment, the said writ petition has been dism...
Rakesh Gupta & Anr. Vs.sushil Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * Reserved on:17. 01.2017 % Decided on :23. 05.2017 + C.S.(OS) 1161/2015, Crl.M.A.18029/2015 & I.A.8777/2015 RAKESH GUPTA & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Sanjay Goswami, Advocate versus SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Deepak Chopra, Adv. for D-1 and D-2. Ms.Manpreet Gill, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT I.A.12175/2016 (on behalf of defendant no.1 under Order VII Rule 11 (d) CPC) The defendant no.1 vide this application has sought the dismissal of 1. the suit on the ground that the plaintiffs have no cause of action in their favour. It is submitted that suit is based on a Will dated 31.05.2010 and its Codicil dated 23.03.2011 executed by defendant no.4 and she is still alive. No suit can be filed since the Will is enforceable only on the demise of testator, and testator is still alive. CS (OS) 1161/2015 Page 1 2. In their reply, the plaintiffs have submitted that although the document is...
Ritu Batra & Anr vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :23. d MAY, 2017 RITU BATRA & ANR CRL.M.C. 177/2016 ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Parinav Gupta, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manoj Pant, Advocate for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners victims daughters to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 27.02.2015 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.940/2014 registered under Sections 302/201/364/380/404/411/ 4IPC at PS Dwarka North whereby respondent No.2 - Atul Kumar (hereinafter referred as the respondent) was granted regular bail under Section 439 C.P.C. The petition is contested by respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.3. Admitted position is that the respondent along with co-accused - Pramod Kumar @...
M/S Kee Pharma Limited vs.assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~26 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4436/2017 M/S KEE PHARMA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:23. 05.2017 Through: Mr.Rajnish Ranjan, Mr.Pranab Prakash and Mr.Aditya Raina, Advocates versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.C.Chawla, Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu and Mr.Pradeep Chandra Sati, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT(ORAL) CM Nos. 19375/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.19376/2017 (for condonationof delay) For the reasons stated in the application the application is allowed. W.P.(C) No.4436/2017 and CM No.19374/2017 1. Vide this petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 28th February, 2017 in an appeal bearing ATA No.886(4)2016 before the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal whereby the appeal filed by the appellant W.P. (C) 4436/2017 Page 1 of 13 therein, also arrayed as the present petitioner, under Section 7-I of the Employees Provi...
Rabindra Kumar Singh vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$ 39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :23. d May, 2017 BAIL APPL. 685/2017 & Crl.M.A.8561/2017 RABINDRA KUMAR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Kislay Pandey & Ankur Gogia, Advs. Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS New Ashok Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. First information report (FIR) No.1136/2015 was registered on 22.8.2015 on the complaint of Akhilesh Kumar for and on behalf of Vibrant Infratel Pvt. Ltd. alleging offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 having been committed. The crime reported in the said FIR has been under investigation, allegations therein having been made, inter alia, against the petitioner herein he being the prime suspect.2. As per the status report submitted in response to the petition at hand by the station house officer of police station New Ashok Nagar, the petitioner has not been very cooperati...
Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors vs.sachin Kumar Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5129/2016 & CM No.21351/2016 Date of Decision :23. d March, 2017 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Advocate versus SACHIN KUMAR LAMBA Through Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) The petitioners impugns the order dated 25.2.2016 passed by the Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in OA No.561/2015, holding as under: 6. Considering the above, the O.A. is allowed. We quash the impugned orders dated 26.03.2013, 24.05.2013 and 18.09.2014 of the respondents and direct that the applicant be taken back in service. The applicant has been claiming that he was medically fit to work as a driver. The respondents may, if they are so advised, get a fresh medical examination conducted and offer a post of driver to the applicant, if he is found to be medically fit f...
Shital Prashad Kalra vs.naresh Bahadur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~11 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA5142015 & CM No.13780/2015 Date of Judgment:23. d May, 2017 SHITAL PRASHAD KALRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ashwani Bharadwaj, Adv. versus NARESH BAHADUR & ORS. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Tarun Jaitley, Adv. with Ms.Himani Bhatnagar, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is judgment and decree dated 6th April, 2015 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge-II, Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, by which the suit of the appellant for recovery of Rs.10,19,200/- was dismissed.2. The respondent No.2 is the sister of the wife of the appellant/plaintiff and respondent No.1 is the husband of the respondent No.2. Respondent No.3 is the foster sister of the respondents No.1 and 2. It is alleged that on persuasion of respondents No.1 and 2, the appellant deposited a sum of 1,49,000/- on various dates in the bank account No.10001952591, State Bank of India, Nirma...
Sh Prabhat Verma vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
13 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 87/2015 SH PRABHAT VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bankey Bihari, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Through: Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Prabhasahay Kaur Advocate for respondent No.1. Date of Decision:23. d May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present petition has been filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate of the will dated 02nd August, 2014 of late Mrs. Malti Verma, wife of Mr. S.V.S. Verma.2. It has been averred in the petition that petitioner is the eldest son of the deceased Mrs. Malti Verma, who expired on 20th December, 2014. The deceased is stated to have executed a Will dated 02nd August, 2014, which was duly witnessed by Mr. V.P. Verma and Mr. A.K. Ruhilla. The English translation of the Will dated 02nd August, 2014 is reproduced hereinbelow:-"TEST.CAS. 87/2015 Page 1 of 4 I, Malti Verma W/o Sh. S.V.S. Verma, in...
Suman vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2017
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : MAY23 2017. CRL.A. 702/2003 Through None. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Gupta, APP SUMA N STATE SI Naresh Kumar PS-Kamla Market CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 19.08.2003 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.30/2002 arising out of FIR No.461/2001 at Police Station Kamla Market whereby the appellant was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 368 read with Sections 366 IPC and Section 3, 4 & 5 ITP Act; the instant appeal has been preferred by her. By an order dated 23.8.2003, she was awarded various prison terms; maximum being Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine `5,000/- under Section 368 read with Section 366 IPC. All the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on a raid by police at Kotha No.70, G.B.Road, Delhi, four girls including one X(assum...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »