Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Premium Serums & Vaccines Pvt. Ltd. Vs.medical Superintendent Safd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~47 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4576/2017 Judgment delivered on:24. 05.2017 M/S PREMIUM SERUMS & VACCINES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus : ........ RESPONDENTS MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kirtimaan Singh with Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Mr. Waize Ali Nor and Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 and 2.. Mr. S.N. Gupta with Mr. Atul Kharbanda, Advocates. : JUDGMENT2405.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.19966/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4576/2017 & CM No.19967/2017 (for interim order) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition , seeks a mandamus to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to issue a show cause notice to respondent No.3 and initiate blacklisting process against the respondent No.3. W.P.(C) No.4576 /2017 Page 1 of 3 Further, it is prayed that the...
Suresh Nath Jha vs.institute for Steel Development & Growth (Insdag) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. 05.2017 LPA282016 and CAV322016 and CM APPL. 1441/2016 SURESH NATH JHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Makkar, Sr. Advocate (amicus curiae) with Mr. Harsh Prakash, Adv. versus INSTITUTE FOR STEEL DEVELOPMENT & GROWTH (INSDAG) & ORS THR ITS PRESIDENT ..... Respondent Through: M/s Sunil K. Jain, Reeta Chaudhary & Abhishek Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. We have heard the learned Amicus Curiae on behalf of the appellant, and learned counsel for the respondent, and proceed to dispose of the LPA. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 02.11.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the appellants writ petition i.e. W.P. (C.) No.5617/2012 on the ground that respondent no.1 i.e. Institute for Steel Development and Growth (INSDAG) is neither an instrumentality, nor an LPA282016 Page 1 of 33 agency of the governme...
Chanchal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 05.2017 Delivered on:24. 05.2017 CRL.A.1119/2015 & Crl.M(B) 80& Crl.M.A. 159CHANCHAL STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr.Faraz Maqbool with Mohd.Faraz : Dr.M.P.Singh. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 Chanchal, the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 34 of the IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years, fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further RI for six months.2. The appeal was admitted on 02.11.2005 and Trial Court records were called for. Along with the appeal, the appellant had also filed an application seeking suspension of sentence and another application seeking his release from custody on the ground that on the date of the occurrence i.e. 13.05.2013, the appellant was below 18 years of age. In support of the aforesaid contention, a school leaving...
Suman Singh vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON24h MAY, 2017 + SUMAN SINGH CRL.M.C. 2157/2017 Through : Mr.Mandeep Singh Malik, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR Through : Ms.Anita Abraham, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.8846/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2157/2017 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for expeditious disposal of her application filed for seeking interim maintenance.2. Perusal of the file reveals that complaint case under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (In short DV Act) is pending before the Trial Court since 2013. Application moved by the petitioner for interim maintenance has yet not been decided. The next date of hearing is 26.07.2017. CRL.M.C. 2157/2017 page 1 of 2 3. Since the matter is pending since long and applicatio...
Mehar Wing Services Private Limited & Anr vs.m/s Jindal Restaurant
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :16.5.2017 Judgment delivered on :24.5.2017 CS(COMM) 173/2016 MEHAR WING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Mr. D.K. Yadav, Advs. versus M/S JINDAL RESTAURANT ..... Defendant Through Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bhanita, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A. No.3282/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code), I.A. No.4272/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code) & I.A. No.4600/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of the Code) in CS(COMM) 173/2016 1. Plaintiff No.1 is a company by the name of Mehar Wing Services Private Limited duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. Its principal place of business is at Wazir Pura Road, Opposite Sanjay CS (COMM) 173/2016 Page 1 of 17 Talkies, Agra. Plaintiff No.2 is a partnership firm and carrying on trade and business under a mutual understanding with plaintiff No.1. The main object of ...
Ravi Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAVI KUMAR W.P.(C) 3208/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev.P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Surender Kumar, Satya Prakash Singh, Advs. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner Ravi Kumar had applied for recruitment to the post of Constable (GD), in the selection process which was conducted by the Staff Selection Commission, Allahabad. This selection process was initiated vide advertisement published in the year 2011.2. On clearing Physical Endurance Test and Physical Standard Test, the petitioner had appeared in the written examination. On the basis of the marks secured, the petitioner had qualified for appointment as Constable (GD) in Border Security Force, Central Reserve Police Force and Sashastra Seema Bal. He was asked to undergo medical examination. He was declared fit...
Ashwath Infratech Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs.national Mission for Clean Ganga a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 4140/2017 & CM No.18118/2017 (stay) ASHWATH INFRATECH PVT LTD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus NATIONAL MISSION FOR CLEAN GANGA AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. S. Kaushik, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS For the Respondent : Mr. P. Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Mishra and Mr. Ishwar Singh, Advs. for NMCG Ms. Shreya Sinha, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2405.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners, by the present petition, impugn the show cause notice dated 09.05.2017 issued by respondent No.1, whereby the petitioners have been directed to deploy the trash skimmers by 12.05.2017, failing which the contract awarded to the petitioners would stand terminated. WP(C) 4140/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. It is contended that in terms of the time period prescribed under the contract, the petitioners were granted 3...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.dalganjan Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.353/2016 + % THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. 24th May, 2017 ..... Appellant Gambhir, Himanshu Advocate. DALGANJAN SINGH & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Raviinder Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the Insurance Company impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 18.5.2016 allowing the claim petition and awarding compensation of Rs.4,99,152/- along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.2. Learned counsel for the appellant has argued two aspects. The first aspect which is argued is that no relationship of employer and employee was proved between the respondent No.1 herein and the FAO No.353/2016 Page 1 of 5 respondent No.2 herein. Respondent No.2 herein...
Jagvinder Singh vs.the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~9. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.6534/2016 Date of decision:24. h May, 2017 JAGVINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Dr. Kanwal Sapra & Mr. Arun Kumar Sapra, Advocates. versus THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner-Jagvinder Singh upon selection was appointed as Constable (Driver) in the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) on 12th August, 2013.2. On 28th June, 2014, show cause notice was issued to the petitioner proposing termination of services for the reason that the petitioner had furnished wrong information in his verification form. Thereafter, another show cause notice was issued on 16th October, 2014.3. The petitioner submitted written explanation to the show cause notices on 18th July, 2014 and 10th November, 2014.4. By order dated 24th November, 2014, the service of ...
M/S Kumar Food Industries Ltd. Vs.the Central Bank of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.149/2017 + % M/S KUMAR FOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. 24th May, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. R.K.Jain, Adv. Through: versus THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.20080/2017 (delay of 121 days in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 121 days in re- filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No.20079/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RSA No.149/2017 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial RSA No.149/2017 Page 1 of 3 Court dated 6.1.2016 and the First Appellate Court dated 23.7.2016; by which the courts below have rejected the suit plaint filed by the appellant/plaintiff u...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »