Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cureway Drugs & Anr vs.sahajanand Health Care & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
22 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1075/2016 & I.A. 16227/2013 CUREWAY DRUGS & ANR Through: Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advocate. ..... Plaintiffs versus SAHAJANAND HEALTH CARE & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shubham Shanker Saxena, Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Shukla, Advocate for defendants No.1 and 3. Date of Decision :24. h May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, passing off, damages/rendition of accounts and delivery up etc. The prayer clause in para 33 of the plaint is reproduced hereinbelow:-"injunction restraining i) a decree for permanent the Defendant, its directors, assigns in business, dealers, stockiest etc. from using the impugned GOLDEN ULTIMATE SKIN CREAM, GOLDEN ULTIMATE SOAP carton/label/packaging or any other carton/label/packaging that may be a colourable imitation or substantial reproduction of ULTIMATE SKIN CREAM & ULTIMAT...
Raman Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6409/2016 Date of decision :24. h May, 2017 RAMAN KUMAR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-1 to 3 with Mr.Brajesh Kr. Central Govt. Pleader. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners, 15 in number, had applied for selection to the posts of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs, for short) and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles, in the recruitment process initiated in 2013.2. After clearing the Physical Standard Test and the Physical Efficiency Test the petitioners had appeared for the written examination held on 12th May, 2013. The petitioners were informed that they had cleared the written examination vide result issued by the by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC, for short) on 28th November, 2013. T...
Akanksha Sirohi vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 18, 2017 Judgment delivered on: May 24, 2017 + W.P.(C) 8964/2016, CM Nos. 36427/2016 & 38478/2016 AKANKSHA SIROHI Through: Ms. Anshu Priyanka, Adv. with ........ Petitioner versus Mr. Utkarsh, Adv. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Disha Malhotra, Adv. for University of Delhi Mr. Kavindra Gill, Adv. for UOI/R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances it is, therefore, humbly prayed to: Issue appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondents to set aside a. the notification dated 28.09.2016 issued by the respondents for second counseling scheduled to be held on 29.09.2016 b. Issue appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondents declaring any action taken by them in furtherance of the notification ...
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs.ifci Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4603/2017 and CM APPL. 20104-20105/2017 BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Verma, Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Ms. Manisha Mehta, Advocates IFCI LTD versus Through: Mr. R.P. Agrawal, Advocate with Ms. Priyadarshini Verma, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2405.2017 CAV5232017 1. Counsel for the caveator/respondent enters appearance and states that he has received a complete set of the paper book.2. The caveat stands discharged. W.P.(C) 4603/2017 and CM APPL. 20104-20105/2017 1. The petitioner/BPCL is aggrieved by the order dated 11.05.2017 passed by the learned DRAT, whereunder it has been directed to deposit in the Tribunal, the entire money received by it from the sale of an immovable property, mortgaged with the respondent/IFCI.2. Mr. J.P. Sengh, learned Senior Advocate appearing ...
Amanpreet Singh vs.kuldeep Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 24, 2017 CM(M) 577/2017 AMANPREET SINGH Through: Mr.Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. ........ Petitioner + versus Through: None. KULDEEP SINGH & ANR CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) ........ RESPONDENTS CM1994117 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 577/2017 1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 20th April, 2017 whereby the learned Trial Court has allowed the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XVI Rule 14 CPC but dismissed the application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.2. The grievance of the petitioner against the impugned order is only to the extent that his prayer to amend the plaint has been declined by the learned Trial Court. CM(M) No.577/2017 Page 1 of 6 3. The application seeking amendment of the plaint has been dismissed by ...
M/S Rohtak Road Transport Centre Workers Association (Regd.) vs.delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.147/2017 & CM Nos. 20018-19/2017 + % M/S ROHTAK ROAD TRANSPORT CENTRE WORKERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Appellant 24th May, 2017 Through: Mr. Suryakant Singhla, Ms. Mayanka Dhawan and Ms. Mehaak Jaggi, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 6.3.2017 by which the first appellate court accepted the appeal filed by the defendant in the suit and set aside the judgment of the Trial Court dated 24.11.2015 by which the trial court while dismissing the suit of the appellant/plaintiff for one relief of grant of alternative allotment however decreed the suit for the second relief that the members of the appella...
Mukesh vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MUKESH FAO No.466/2016 24th May, 2017 Through: Mr. Nitin Dayal, Advocate. ..... Appellant STATE & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jayati Parasher and Mr. Rajat Gava, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Ompal Singh, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is filed by the appellant impugning the judgment of the probate court below dated 6.10.2015; dismissing the probate petition as barred by limitation.2. The appellant herein filed the subject probate petition seeking letters of administration of the Will dated 7.6.2007 of his late father Sh. Laxman Singh who expired on 22.5.2008. Deceased Sh. Laxman Singh left behind as his legal heirs, besides the appellant/petitioner/son, the respondent No.2 in the court below who FAO No.466/2016 Page 1 of 6 was late Sh. Laxman Singhs daughter, a...
State Nct of Delhi vs.eliazer Kindo @ Anup
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order: May 24th 2017 CRL.L.P. 322/2017 STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State versus ..... Respondent ELIAZER KINDO @ ANUP Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.8831/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl. M.A. No.8830/2017 (Condonation of delay) By this application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act read1) with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 179 days in filing the accompanying petition for seeking leave to appeal under Section 378(1) of Cr. P.C. against the order dated 19.08.2016 whereby the accused has been acquitted from the offence under Section 365/370/376 of IPC.2) Heard the submissions made on behalf of the State. Crl. L.P. No.322/2017 Page 1 of 53) In the application for condon...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.jai Prakash & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order: May 24th 2017 CRL.L.P. 323/2017 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State versus JAI PRAKASH & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) ORDER ..... Respondent Crl. M.A. No.8868/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl. M.A. No.8867/2017 (Condonation of delay) & Crl. L.P. No.323/2017 By this application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act read1) with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 195 days in filing the accompanying petition for seeking leave to appeal under Section 378(1) of Cr. P.C. against the order dated 13.07.2016 whereby the accused have been acquitted from the offence Crl. L.P. No.323/2017 Page 1 of 5 under Section 354, 354A, 354D, 323, 506 of IPC.2) Heard the submissions made on behalf of the ...
Aimil Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2017
$~45. * + 47. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4597/2017 & C.M. No.20095/2017 (Stay) AIMIL LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 4599/2017 & C.M. No.20099/2017 (Stay) AIMIL LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Jain, Advocate with Mr.Virag Tiwari, Advocate for the... Petitioner. Mr.Manmeet Singh Arora, Advocate with Ms.Anita Bharal, VATO, Ward No.203. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2405.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: C.M. No.20096/2017( for exemption) in W.P.(C) No.4597/2017 C.M. No.20100/2017(for exemption) in W.P.(C) No.4599/2017 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions W.P.(C) No.4597/2017 & W.P.(C) No.4599/2017 2. These two petitions are filed by AIMIL Ltd. under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. W.Ps.(C) No.4597/2017 & 4599/2017 Page 1 of 7 3. The prayers in the W.P.(C) No.4597/2017 are as under: (a) set aside and quash th...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »