Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.hemlata & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25th May, 2017 FAO312017 and CMs 1887/2017, 1888/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus HEMLATA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.K. Gautam, Mr. for Advocates Siddharth, respondents no.1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order dated 29th September, 2016 whereby the Commissioner, Employees Compensation has awarded compensation of Rs.3,11,970/- along with interest @ 12% per annum.2. On 3rd January, 2011, Ramesh Kumar was driving Mahindra Champion bearing No.DL-1-LJ-1290 during the course of his employment with respondent no.4. On 3rd January, 2011 at about 12.10 pm, the aforesaid vehicle was met with an accident which resulted in fatal injuries to Ramesh Kumar. The police registered FIR No.under Sections 279/304A IPC at P.S. Badli, Delhi. Ramesh Kumar was survived by his widow, a minor daughter ...
Samridh Sharma vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :25. h MAY, 2017 CRL.M.C. 2480/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.10659/2016 ........ Petitioner SAMRIDH SHARMA Through : Mr.Manish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through : Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP. Mr.Anupam Srivastava, Advocate with Ms.Sharmistha Ghosh, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to challenge the legality and correctness of orders dated 05.03.2016 and 13.12.2013 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate by the application for dropping the proceedings under Section 138 N.I.Act was dismissed.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the respondent No.2 is a sleeping director and has nothing to do with the issuance of the cheques in question. The petitioner is not the Managing Crl...
Ashwani Kumar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h April, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 155/2016 ASHWANI KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Krishan Kumar and Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocates. versus THE STATE Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Om Prakash, PS Hauz Khas. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Convicted for offences punishable under Section 307 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Ashwani Kumar challenges the impugned judgment dated 31st October, 2015 and the order on sentence dated 23rd November, 2015 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years for offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for Ashwani Kumar submits that the recovery of knife is highly improbable and is not admissible under ...
Rajesh @ Putiya vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
Ram Swaroop vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h January , 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 930/2001 RAM SWAROOP ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. D.K. Mathur, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Saroj Bala and SI Amit Kumar, PS Ambedkar Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Convicted for offences punishable under SectionsIPC vide impugned judgment dated 22nd November, 2001 on the strength of dying declaration of the deceased prosecutrix and the testimony of her husband coupled with the medical evidence, Ram Swaroop prefers the present appeal.2. Vide impugned order on sentence dated 22nd November, 2001 Ram Swaroop was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 8 years for the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC and directed to pay fine of 5000/- each on bot...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi vs.meeta Gutgutia P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d May, 2017 Date of decision:25. h May, 2017 ITA3062017 + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-2 NEW DELHI MEETA GUTGUTIA PROP. M/S FERNS N PETALS.... Respondent Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Advocate. Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ..... Appellant Through: versus WITH versus Through: ITA3072017 ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Advocate. + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-2 NEW DELHI MEETA GUTGUTIA PROP. M/S FERNS N PETALS.... Respondent + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-2 NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Advocate. ..... Appellant ITA3082017 WITH Through: ITA Nos. 306, 307, 308, 309 & 310 of 2017 Page 1 of 49 versus versus Through: WITH ITA3092017 Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. MEETA GUTGUTIA PROP. M/S FERNS N PETALS.... Respondent + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-2 NEW DELHI MEETA GUTGUTIA PROP. M/S FERNS N PETALS.... Respondent + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOM...
in the Matter of Kas Movies Makers Private Limited (In vol.liqn) vs. . ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h May, 2017 Pronounced on:25. h May, 2017 CO.PET. No.36/2017 IN THE MATTER OF KAS MOVIES MAKERS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Mayank Goel & Mr.Monamshel Maring, Advocates for OL. versus .... Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This is a petition under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter as the Act) by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of Kas Movies Makers Private Limited (hereinafter as petitioner).2. The petitioner company was incorporated on 25.04.1988 vide Registration No.-031402 having Corporate Identity Number U92111DL1988PTC031402, under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana with the CO.PET. No.36/2017 Page 1 of 5 authorized Share Capital of the Company `1,00,000/-divided into 10,000 equity shares of `10/- each.3. The registered office of the ...
Rukma Devi vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 239/2002 SOHAN LAL Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, PS Inderpuri. WITH CRL.A. 189/2002 RUKMA DEVI Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the PS Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, State, Inderpuri AND + CRL.A. 651/2002 RAJESH KUMAR Through Mr.Rohit Minocha, Adv. with Mr.Chaitanya, Adv. .....Appellant Crl. A. No.239,189&651/2002 Page 1 of 10 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus Through ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State, Inspt.Rajeev Yadav, PS Inderpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT Since all the three appeals have been preferred against the they are being 1. common judgment and order on sentence passed, dec...
Shushre Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~50-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 525/2015 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 527/201547 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Page 1 of 30 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 529/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2220/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2221/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2224/2015 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX W.P.(C) No.525 of 2015 & connected matters + W.P.(C) 2225/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2226/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPE...
Gulfam vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »