Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit @ Lalu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h March, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 858/2016 AMIT @ LALU STATE ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Braham Singh, Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Mr. Rohit Vidhudi, Ms. Manju, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with Insp. Badruddin Khan, ASI Jaiveer, PS Khajuri Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Amit @ Lalu challenges the impugned judgment dated 8th July, 2016 convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 354/354A IPC and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) and the order on sentence dated 9th July, 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `3,000/- for offence punishable under Section 8 of POCSO Act, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence punishable under Section 354A IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine...
Badri Prasad (Deceased) Through Legal Heir Krishan Kumar vs.veer Chand ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.73/2017 + % BADRI PRASAD (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIR KRISHAN KUMAR25h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Alok Kumar and Mr. Neeraj Kr. Gupta, Advocates. versus VEER CHAND & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff (since deceased and now represented by his legal heir), impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 22.5.2010 and the First Appellate Court dated 2.11.2016; dismissing the suit for possession and mandatory injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff with respect to the suit property being plot no.A-95, Mandoli Road, Nathu Colony, Delhi.2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff claimed that he was the owner of the suit property since December RSA No.73/2017 Page 1 ...
Tejinder Gulati vs.ranjeeta Kaur Gulati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :25. h MAY, 2017 $~29 * + TEJINDER GULATI versus CRL.M.C. 1385/2016 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Tarun Goomber with Mr.Gaurav Goswami, Mr.Jitender Goomber and Ms.Priti Goswami, Advocates. RANJEETA KAUR GULATI Through : Mr.Vinit Virmani with Mr.R.K.Kohli, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. In the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks modification of the order dated 16.11.2010 whereby condition was imposed upon him not to travel abroad without prior permission of the Court. The petition is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner is facing trial in a complaint case filed under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (In short DV Act) by the respondent. He is also involved in case FIR No.475/2012 registered under Sections 498A/4IPC at PS Hari Nagar. The parties wer...
Chetan Khanna Vs.‘c’ & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
N * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1576/2013 CHETAN KHANNA Reserved on:12. h April, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Adv. % + versus C & ANR. Represented by: None for R-1. ..... Respondent Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State/ R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Convicted for offences punishable under Sectionand 495 IPC Chetan Khanna challenges the impugned judgment dated 13th August, 2013 and the order on sentence dated 17th August, 2013 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for offence punishable under Section 495 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence punishable under Section 417 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for Chetan Khanna submits that there are glaring contradictio...
Ganpati Fincap Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~50-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 525/2015 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 527/201547 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Page 1 of 30 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 529/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2220/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2221/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2224/2015 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX W.P.(C) No.525 of 2015 & connected matters + W.P.(C) 2225/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2226/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPE...
Bholu vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
Abhinav Kumar vs.oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~16 and 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4600/2017 and CM201012017 (stay) W.P.(C) 4621/2017 and CM201402017 (stay) 1. ABHINAV KUMAR M/S SONIA HOSPITAL PVT LTD ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Pankaj Vivek and Ms. Manisha Mehta, Advocates with petitioner in person in W.P.(C) 4600/2017 and Mr. Pradeep Kr. Lathar, Director of the petitioner firm in W.P.(C) 4621/2017. versus ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Through : Mr. S.K. Garg, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The appellants are aggrieved by a common order dated 16.5.2017 ORDER2505.2017 passed by the learned DRAT dismissing two separate appeals filed by them against the interim order dated 19.9.2016 passed by the DRT dismissing their application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short the SARFAESI Act) for restraining the responden...
Satish Kumar & Ors. Vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 347/2001 SATISH KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Bharat Sharma, Advocate with appellants in person. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr.A.K. Tripathi, Advocate for the Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.By this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., 1. the appellants, namely, Satish Kumar, Bhram Singh Parkash, Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjay and Jaheer Ahmad seeks to challenge the judgment dated 23.04.2001, passed in S.C. No.83/1997 in a case registered as FIR No.194/1993 under Section 3of IPC, at Police Station Maya Puri, Delhi whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 3IPC and order on sentence dated 01.05.2001 vide which they have been awarded the rigorous imprisonment for a period 3 years and fine of Rs.5,000/- each,...
t.v. Today Network Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~44 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 4329/2017 T.V. TODAY NETWORK LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate and Mr. A.J.Bambhani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prasouk Jain, Mr. Kunal Kanungo, Ms. Avani Bansal, Mr.Karan Sinha and Ms. Madhvi Gupta, Advocates with Dr. Puneet Jain, AR of petitioner in person For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Anurag Alhuwalia, CGSC with Mr. Rakshith Srivastava, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Kirtimaan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for respondent No.2. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Chandrima Mitra, Ms. Manasi Vyas, Ms. Hemangini Mehta, Advocates for the respondent No.3. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vibhav Srivastava, Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Ms. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Debarshi Dutta, Ms. Priya Puri, Mr. Tushar Bha...
Shushre Securities Pvt. Ltd vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~50-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 525/2015 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 527/201547 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Page 1 of 30 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 529/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2220/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2221/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2224/2015 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX W.P.(C) No.525 of 2015 & connected matters + W.P.(C) 2225/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2226/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPE...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »