Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukund L. Abhyankar vs.chief Executive Officer, National Federation of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2017 + O.M.P.(I) 1/2017 MUKUND L. ABHYANKAR ........ Petitioner Versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF URBAN CO-OP. BANK AND CREDIT SOCIETIES LTD. AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Mr. Ninad Laud, Mr. Dilip Annasaheb Taur & Mr. Karan Mathur. Mr S. Rajappa and Dr Puran Chand. : For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying as under:-"a. Stay the email notice dated 07.02.2017 [sic]. addressed by the Chief Executive of the NAFCUB, Respondent No.1 herein to the... Petitioner until the commencement of arbitral proceedings; b. Restrain the Respondent Nos 1 & 2 from conducting the No Confidence Motion proposed for 27.02.2017 until the commencemen...
Amit Yadav vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SACHIN Reserved on:15. h February, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 534/2002 Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Amicus ..... Appellant Curiae with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Mr. Harjeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Jai Bhardwaj, Advs. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with Insp. Rajeev Yadav, PSI Sher Singh, PS Inder Puri. + CRL.A. 540/2002 AMIT YADAV STATE Represented by: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Yadav, PSI Sher Singh, PS Inder Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Vide impugned judgment dated 2nd April, 2002, Sachin and Amit Yadav were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(g), 3and 506-II IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 21st May, 2002 they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- for offence punish...
Siraj vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
Oswal Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~ * 1 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3606/2003 OSWAL CHEMICALS & FERTILIZERS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Gautam, Mr. Vivek Ojha and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2505.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.1. The... Petitioner, Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd., has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that the impugned Notification No.23/2002-Cus dated 1st March 2002 issued by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India to the extent that it removed sulphur' and 'rock phosphate from the ambit of goods entitled to nil rate of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on their import...
M/S New Friends Coop. House Building Society Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Fairdeal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI25h May, 2017 RSA No.64/2017 + % M/S NEW FRIENDS COOP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY PVT. LTD. M/S FAIRDEAL ESTATE & ORS. Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.7515/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.64/2017 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 26.7.2013 and the First Appellate Court dated 17.11.2016; by which the suit for possession, injunction and damages filed by the appellant/plaintiff was dismissed. The suit property is situated as per RSA No.64/2017 Page 1 of 6 the plaint in khasra no.3 of village Joga Bhai, Tehshil Mehrauli, New Delhi. The area o...
Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~50-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 525/2015 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 527/201547 GANPATI FINCAP SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Page 1 of 30 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 529/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2220/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2221/2015 SHUSHRE SECURITIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX + W.P.(C) 2224/2015 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX W.P.(C) No.525 of 2015 & connected matters + W.P.(C) 2225/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2226/2015 SHREY INFRADEVELOPE...
M/S Mayawala Gases Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Bhawani Pictures
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 959/2006 M/S MAYAWALA GASES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mala Goel, Advocate with Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate versus M/S BHAWANI PICTURES ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shipra Choudhry, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant had instituted a criminal complaint alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I.Act) having been committed by the respondent, such complaint having been presented on 21.12.2000 before the then Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi. The said complaint case resulted in preliminary inquiry under Sections 200 and 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by the court of Metropolitan Magistrate resulting in issuance of process under Section 204 Cr.P.C. by order dated 18.08.2001. Subsequently, the case stood transferred to the court of Additional Sessions Judge pursuant to the certain directions then i...
Kanhaya Lal vs.the Management of M/S Swantantra Bharat Mill
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~22. * + % LPA No.137/2017 & C.M. No.7548/2017 KANHAYA LAL Date of Decision:25. 05.2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashish Jha, Advocate. versus THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SWANTANTRA BHARAT MILL .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) to assail the judgment dated 21.03.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C.) No.5325/2004, whereby the appellants writ petition to assail the award dated 06.11.2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Industrial TribunalI, Delhi, has been dismissed.2. The appellant has filed the aforesaid application being C.M. No.7548/2017 to seek condonation of 238 days delay in filing the present LPA. Since we have heard learned counsel for the appellant and we are not inclined to issue notice in the LPA, no purpose would be served in issuing notice in the said applicati...
Satish Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MAY25 2017 CRL.M.C.1519/2017 & CRL.M.A.7149/2017 SATISH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.V.K.Jain, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS + S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 16.2.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision No.112A/16 (New Criminal Revision No.204418/2016) by which the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dated 8.10.2015 dismissing the petitioners application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was upheld.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the impugned orders of the court below cannot be sustained. The petitioner was abducted by respondents No.2 to 6 in broad day light on 4.6.2014. The incident wa...
Shahbuddin vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »