Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul @ Ganja vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 353/2017 RAHUL @ GANJA Reserved on:27. h April, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal and Ms. Sabia Malik, Advocates for Mr. Puneet Singhal, Advocate (DHCLSC) STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the ..... Respondent State with PSI Pankaj Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Convicted for offence punishable under Section 326 IPC, Rahul challenges the impugned judgment dated 7th January, 2017 and the order on sentence dated 12th January, 2017 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of `10,000/- for offence punishable under Section 326 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the prosecution has failed to prove any motive behind the alleged offence. Despite public persons being present at the spot when the appellant was allegedly arrested, nobody was associat...
Asif vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
South Asian Enterprises Ltd. & Anr. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~ * 3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4623/2001 SOUTH ASIAN ENTERPRISES LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai with Mr. Jagjeet Singh Sahani, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Junior standing counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER2505.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.1. South Asian Enterprises Limited (SAEL) and VLS Finance Limited (VLS),... Petitioners 1 and 2, respectively, have filed the present petition on 30th July, 2001 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying (i) that the impugned notices dated 31st May 2001 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) being Annexure A, A-1 and A-2 and B, B-1 and B-2 be quashed and (ii) costs of the petition be awarded.2. On 16th July 2002, while admitting the petition and expediting its hearing, this Court stayed the proceedings under Se...
Rakesh & Anr. Vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Appeal No.614/2001 Date of Decision: May 25, 2017 RAKESH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey Mr.Ashutosh Kaushal, Advs. and versus STATE OF DELHI .. Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 382 Cr.P.C. against judgment and order on sentence dated 25.07.2001 whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498A and 304B and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years each for the offence under Section 304B IPC and to undergo RI for six months each and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default to undergo SI two months for the offence under Section 498A IPC. Crl.Appeal No.614/2001 Page1 of 16 2. The facts of the case, as per the case of the prosecution, in a nutshell are that on 06.11.1996 an intimation was received vide DD No.43 at 10.20 P.M. through wireless that near ...
Cosmo Ferrites Ltd. Vs.pragya Electronics Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 350/2016 COSMO FERRITES LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Rohit Bhalla with Mr Anshuman Sood. Mr Rohit Goel and Mr Gaurav Singh. PRAGYA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : : VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (hereafter CFL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') challenging the arbitral award dated 13.04.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned award') made by the arbitral tribunal constituted by the sole arbitrator, Justice V. P. Bhatnagar (Retired). CFLs challenge to the impugned award is limited to the extent that the arbitral tribunal has not awarded pre-award interest (pre-reference and pendente lite) on the amounts awarded in favour of CFL for Soft Ferrites (hereafter the goods) suppli...
Sachin vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SACHIN Reserved on:15. h February, 2017 Decided on:25. h May, 2017 CRL.A. 534/2002 Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Amicus ..... Appellant Curiae with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Mr. Harjeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Jai Bhardwaj, Advs. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with Insp. Rajeev Yadav, PSI Sher Singh, PS Inder Puri. + CRL.A. 540/2002 AMIT YADAV STATE Represented by: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Yadav, PSI Sher Singh, PS Inder Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Vide impugned judgment dated 2nd April, 2002, Sachin and Amit Yadav were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(g), 3and 506-II IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 21st May, 2002 they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- for offence punish...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 vs.instronics Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~40-49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA6132016 + + + + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA6142016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA6152016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA8012016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD ..... Respondent With ITA8052016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ITAs No.613/2016, 614/2016, 615/2016, 801/2016, 805/2016, 809/2016, 814/2016, 840/2016, 848/2016, 849/2016. Page 1 of 10 + + + + TAX CENTRAL-3 Versus INSTRONICS LTD. With ITA8092016 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA8142016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Versus INSTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent With ITA8402016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF ...
Wasim vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GULFAM Reserved on: March 06, 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 CRL.A. 524/2016 Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Ms. Vani ..... Appellant Singhal, Mr. Sachin Agarwal and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1726/2014 SHAHBUDDIN Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Mr. ..... Appellant versus Salman Hashmi, Advocates. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + CRL.A. 1744/2014 RAJESH @ PUTIYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Sanjam Chawla, Ms. Gulshan Khan and Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Advocates. versus CRL.A. 524/2016, 1726/2014, 1744/2014, 10/2015, 172/2015, 466/2015, 887/2015, 712/2016 & 443/2015 Page 1 of 45 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manoj PS Kanjhawala. + BHOLU CRL.A. 10/2015 Represented by: Mr. F. Haq. and M...
Jassum Propcon Projects Ltd vs.munish Arora & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~A- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 05.2017 Pronounced on:25. 05.2017 ARB. A. (COMM.) 8/2017 & IA No.4249/2017 JASSUM PROPCON PROJECTS LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.B.K.Sood and Mr.Sandeep Thukral, Advs. versus MUNISH ARORA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kapil Arora and Mr.Karan Khanna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present petition is filed under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to quash the impugned order dated 13.1.2017 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal directing the petitioner to furnish a bank guarantee for a sum of Rs.4 crores to secure the respondents.2. The case of the appellant is that on 30.09.2009 the parties entered into the Space Buyers Agreement for purchase of a unit on the ground floor measuring 2529.76 sq.ft for a multistoreyed commercial building ABW Tower. On 29.10.2009 an MOU for purchase was entered into between the parties. As per the MOU respondent a...
Asha Devi & Ors vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-25-2017
$~31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 617/2017 & CM Nos.2802/2017 (stay), 4629/2017(stay) ASHA DEVI & ORS ........ Petitioners DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Choudhary Ali Zia Kabir, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocates with Mr. Anil Kumar, UDC (Rehab), DUSIB and Mr. C.B. Dwivedi, Sociologist, Survey, respondent No.1. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh and Mr. Sahaj Garg, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 6. Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Shruthi P., Advocate for Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate for respondent No.4. . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2505.2017 WP(C) 6172017 Page 1 of 3 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that out of 194 Jhuggis that were surveyed, 150 Jhuggis have bee...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »