Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
s.m.r. Baqar vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MARCH01 2017 DECIDED ON : MAY31 2017 + CRL.M.C. 2200/2015 & CRL. M.A.No.77S.M.R. BAQAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A.Das, Advocate with Ms. Rashi Bansal, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. Ms. Rakshi Dubey, Advocate for R2 alongwith R2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred to challenge the correctness of an order dated 17.10.2013 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the petitioner was summoned to face trial for commission of offences punishable under SectionsIPC in case FIR No.93/2009 registered at Police Station Parliament Street. The petition is contested by the complainant/respondent No.2. Crl.M.C.2200/2015 Page 1 of 8 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the complainant X (changed name) filed a complaint case under Section 200 Cr.P.C. along with an appl...
Komal Sharma vs.guru Gobind Singh, Indraprastha University & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 3724/2017 KOMAL SHARMA ........ Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH, INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Laxman Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent CORAM: : Mr. Vaibhav Kalra with Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. K.R..Sunder Rao, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3105.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 3724/2017 & CM No.16387/2017 (for directions) 1. The petitioner by the present petition seeks a direction to the respondent No.1 to direct respondents Nos. 2 & 3 to allow the petitioner to attend classes and to appear in the semester examination WP(C) 3724/2017 Page 1 of 4 and also to shift the petitioner to some other institute affiliated to the respondent No.1.2. The petitioner is a student of law and was admitted in the Fairfield Institute of M...
Narender Kumar Sharma vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 889/2017 % NARENDER KUMAR SHARMA Reserved on:1. t February, 2017 Date of Decision:31. t May, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj & Mr. M.D. Versus Jangra, Advocates UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Ahuja for Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.The petitioner in the present writ petition under Articlesof the Constitution impugns the order dated 30.10.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi in the Original Application No.586/2011 and the order dated 25.04.2016 in Review Application No.132/2012. W.P.(C) No.889/2017 Page 1 of 162) The petitioner submits that he had applied for leave due to ill health of his father to defend his various court cases instituted against him by his wife on false and baseless allegations. He had submitted leave applications...
Manish Kumar vs.the State Gnct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
CRL.REV.P.299/2017 * % + MANISH KUMAR THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 05.2017 Delivered on:31. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr.Kuldeep Kumar. : Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. ORDER ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J CRL. M.A. 6609/2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P.299/2017 & Crl.M.(Bail) 717/2017 1. The present revision petition is directed against the concurrent judgment and orders dated 27.04.2016 and 25.05.2016 passed by the learned Trial Court in CC No.4035/2014 and the judgment dated 31.03.2017 passed by the learned ASJ-04, South-East, Saket Courts, in CA No.56/2016 whereby the petitioner has been convicted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and has been sentenced to CRL.REV.P.299/2017 Page 1 of 7 undergo SI for one year...
Pramod Kumar Jain and Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h May, 2017 Decided on:31. t May, 2017 CRL.M.C. 1777/2011 and Crl. M.A. No.6391/2011 (Stay) PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN AND ANR. Represented by: Mr. Lalit Kumar Jha, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Bharat, PS Civil Lines. Mr. S.P. Jha, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 A complaint case was filed by respondent No.2 as proprietor of M/s. Tridev Construction & Consultants against the two petitioners and one S.K. Agarwal alleging that on 8th May, 2006 the University had floated a tender vide a newspaper advertisement for the purpose of renovation of toilets of SES Jawahar Lal Nehru University. The complainant had participated in the tender and thereafter an agreement was entered into between the parties. However later he was informed by a corrigendum dated 28th February, 2007 that the rebate q...
Shyam Narayan & Ors vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.562/2016 + % SHYAM NARAYAN & ORS. 31st May, 2017 ..... Appellants Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput, Advocate. Through: versus UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 is filed by the appellants who were the applicants before the Railway Claims Tribunal. By this first appeal appellants/applicants impugn the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 10.5.2016 dismissing their claim petition. While the Railway Claims Tribunal has held that the deceased Sh. Manoj was a bonafide passenger, and also that the deceased died on account of fall from the train, however, it has been held that the deceased died on account of his own criminal negligence and hence the appellants/applicants were not entitled to compensation. FAO No.562/2016 Page 1 of 8 2. The facts of the case are t...
Pankaj Roy Wadhwa and Ors vs.registrar Cooperavtive Socities and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5133/2017 1. PANKAJ ROY WADHWA AND ORS Through: Mr. S.D. Wadhwa, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus REGISTRAR COOPERAVTIVE SOCITIES AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, Advocate with Mr. Ahmed Said, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate for R-3/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The present petition has been filed by four petitioners, who claim to ORDER3105.2017 be members of the respondent No.4/Sarai Sidhu Ilaqa Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. praying inter alia for issuing directions for refund of a sum of Rs.32,18,767.50 with interest, that the respondent No.3/DDA had forfeited on cancelling the allotment of a parcel of land made in favour of the Society, vide letter dated 28.02.1994. Pertinently, at that time, the respondent No.3/DDA had refunded a sum of Rs.31,76,414.50 paise to the respondent No.4/Society.2. Vide order dated 2...
Ekram Ansari vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MARCH21 2017 DECIDED ON : MAY31 2017 + CRL.A. 1340/2013 & Crl.M.B.7881/2015 EKRAM ANSARI ..... Appellant STATE & ORS Through : Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellantEkram Ansari impugns a judgment dated 12.08.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.25A/10 arising out of FIR No.3at Police Station Govind Puri by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) (c) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act'). By an order dated 17.08.2013, he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years with fine `1,00,000/-; default sentence being Simple Imprisonment for three months. Crl.A.1340/2013 Page 1 of 8 2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case in nutshell, was that on 05.09.2010 at around 04.45 P.M an information was received by S...
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal vs.the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$~7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5072/2017 RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Chawla, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : M. Harpreet Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER3105.2017 CM No.21760/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5072/2017 1. The petitioner, inter alia, seeks a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to provide a copy of the Order-in-Original No.28/ZR/ADC/2015 dated 17.02.2015, issued by the Additional Commissioner of Customs (Preventive). It is contended that the recovery proceedings have been 2. WP(C) 5072/2017 Page 1 of 2 initiated against the petitioner based on the said order-in-original without the petitioner being supplied with a copy of the said order. The petitioner has made several representations, however, the copy has not yet...
Ramesh Goyal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. A. 128/2017 RAMESH GOYAL Reserved on:11. th May, 2017 Pronounced on:31st May, 2017 ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Advocate Versus + STATE & ANR. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for R-1/State Mohd. Azharuddin, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The second respondent (Ram Prakash Yadav) was summoned by the Metropolitan Magistrate on the complaint (CC No.6621/1/12) of the petitioner herein as presented on 11.12.2012, and put on trial for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by notice of accusations under Section 251 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC), issued and served on 12.08.2013. On conclusion of the trial, by judgment dated 16.07.2015, the respondent was acquitted. It is the said result of the complaint case which is assailed through the criminal appeal at hand, submitted with the leave of the court, under Section 378(4) Cr. PC, obtained on 01.0...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »