Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In the Matter of National Power Exchange Limited (In vol.liqn.) vs. .. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h May, 2017 Pronounced on:26. h May, 2017 CO.PET. No.37/2017 IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL POWER EXCHANGE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Mayank Goel & Mr.Monamshel Maring, Advocates for OL. versus .... Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This is a petition under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter as the Act) by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of National Power Exchange Private Limited (hereinafter as petitioner).2. The petitioner company was incorporated on 11.12.2008 having Corporate Identity Number U40100DL2008PLC185689, under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana with the authorized Share Capital of the CO.PET. No.37/2017 Page 1 of 5 Company Rs.50 crores only divided into 5,00,00,000 equity shares of `10/- each.3. The registered office of the company is s...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.meenakshi Overseas Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~ * 9 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA6922016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior standing counsel. Versus MEENAKSHI OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Kapil Goel, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.ORDER2605.2017 1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 196 (Act) by the Revenue is directed against the impugned order dated 22nd March, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.3148/Del2013 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2004-05.2. Admit.3. The following question of law is framed for consideration: Whether the ITAT erred in law and on facts in quashing the assessment proceedings under Sectionof the Act?. ITA6922016 Page 1 of 18 4. The facts in brief are that the Assessee, Meenakshi Overseas Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30th October, 2004 for the AY200405 declaring its income as Rs. 2,050. The return was ...
Sandeep vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~30 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4668/2017 Date of decision :26. 05.2017 ........ Petitioner Mr. P. Chandrasen, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dibya Nishant, Adv. versus Through : SANDEEP UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Ms.A. Chandra, Adv. JUDGMENT (ORAL) SANJIV KHANNA, J.CM203102017 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4668/2017 & CM No.20309/2017 The petitioner-Sandeep, impugns the order of discharge dated 9th March, 2017 passed by the Commander, Coast Guard Region (W) on behalf of Director General of the Indian Coast Guard. The petitioner was inducted and appointed as a Navik 2. (General Duty) in the -02/2014 batch. WP(C).No.4668/2017 Page 1 of 4 Along with the petitioner had 3. submitted documents including a Class XII certificate issued by the Council of Secondary Education, Mohali (CSEM). the application form, The petitio...
Sanghe Tenpa Lama vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~21 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:26. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 4483/2017 SANGHE TENPA LAMA ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : : Mr. Sidhant Krishan Singh, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Vipra Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2 JUDGMENT2605.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner by the present petition seeks a direction to respondent to accept surrender of the identity certificate issued to the petitioner and for issuance of an Indian passport.2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that on the WP(C) 4483/2017 Page 1 of 3 petitioners approaching the concerned passport office for surrender of the identity card and makes an application for issuance of the passport, the application would be processed in accordance with law and a passport would be issued provided the petitioner satisfies the r...
Royal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Projects Construction ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 05.2017 EX.P. 131/2015 & EA(OS) Nos. 643/2015 & 1012/2015 ROYAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT. LTD. versus NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. (NPCC) ..... Decree Holder ..... Judgement Debtor EX.P. 192/2015 & EA(OS) No.805-806/2015, 1011/2015 & 1033/2015 AND ROYAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT. LTD. versus NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION ..... Decree Holder ..... Judgement Debtor Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder : For the Judgment Debtor : Mr A. P. S. Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr P. S. Bindra, Ms Rishika, Ms Ashmita and Mr Bhuvneshwar Tyagi. Mr Anup J.Bhambhani, Senior Advocate with Mr Rajat Arora and Mr Jaypreet Singh. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 Royal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter RCCPL) has filed the present petitions for enforcement of an arbitral award dated Ex.P. Nos. 131/2015 & 192/2015 Page 1 of 12 10.08.2002 (hereaft...
D S Kundu vs.registrar Cooperative Societies Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 * + W.P.(C) 4743/2017, CM APPL. No.20614/2017 D S KUNDU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan S. Thukral and Mr. Rohit Yadav, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Vaishnavi Rao, Advocate for Mr.Gaurav Verma, Advocate for RCS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL The petitioner is aggrieved by the failure on the part of the ORDER2605.2017 % 1. respondent/RCS to consider and decide two applications filed by him, the first one dated 16.08.2016 under Section 118 read with Section 121 of the Delhi Co-operative Society Act, 2003 (Annexure-P5) and the second one dated 22.10.2016 filed under Rule 60 of the Delhi Co-operative Society Rules, 2007 (Annexure-P6).2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has raised several grievances against the Managing Committee of the Philips Tower Co-operative Society, Sector-23, Dwarka, Delhi of which...
Rahul Chauhan vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 905/2017 Date of decision:26. h May, 2017 ........ Petitioner RAHUL CHAUHAN Through Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advocate for Ms. Monika Arora, Central Government Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner-Rahul Chauhan had applied for selection as Constable (General Duty) in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) for the year 2015-16 under the sports quota.2. Vide opinion of the Medical Board dated 25th October, 2016, the petitioner was declared medically unfit for not meeting the prescribed visual standard. Copy of the memorandum of the Medical Board is not on record. However, it is accepted that the petitioner was declared unfit for the reason that he had poor distant vision (6/24 right eye).3. The petitioner applied for review vide application dated 8th W.P. (C) 905/2017 Pa...
Rohidas Ekanath Lagad vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~32 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 05.2017 % + W.P.(C) 4681/2017 ROHIDAS EKANATH LAGAD versus UNION OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner .... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Saurabh Bhargavan, Advocate. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2605.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-UOI to consider and decide the application, for renewal of certificate of Notary, filed by the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 11th September, 2015 in W.P. (C) No.8503/2015 titled Neelam Sharma Versus Union of India.3. In view of the decision in the case of Neelam Sharma (Supra), I am of the view that the representation/renewal application filed by WP(C) 4681/2017 Page 1 of 2 the petitione...
Sarabjit Prakash & Anr vs.shyam Sahni & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~7,13&24. * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.1134/2008 & IA No.5689/2017 (of the plaintiff under Order XI Rules 12, 14 & 15 of the CPC). SHYAM SAHNI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Pandey and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advs. versus SARABJIT PRAKASH & ORS Through: Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Adv. for D-2. ..... Defendants Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs. for D-7. AND CS(OS) No.511/2016, IAs No.14385/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) and 14386/2016 (of D-1 u/S151CPC). SARABJIT PRAKASH & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through SHYAM SAHNI & ORS ..... Defendants versus Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Pandey and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advs. AND CS(OS) No.983/2013 SHYAM SAHNI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Pandey and Mr. Rajeev Gurung, Advs. versus SARABJIT PRAKASH & ORS. Through: Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Adv. for D-2. ..... Defendants Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs. for D-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDL...
Sanjeet Singh vs.anupama
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2017
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 94/2017 & CM198612017 (stay) 1. SANJEET SINGH ..... Appellant ANUPAMA Through : Mr. Neeraj Yadav with Mr. Deepak Yadav, Advocates with appellant in person. versus Through : Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Advocate with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % Pursuant to the order dated 24.5.2017, the appellant is present on ORDER2605.2017 issuance of production warrants served on him through the Superintendent Jail.2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that vide order dated 28.2.2017 passed by the learned Family Court (North), Rohini Court, Delhi in Ex.No.filed by the respondent/wife against the appellant/husband, taking note of the fact that the appellant/Judgment Debtor (JD) had not paid the arrears of maintenance to the respondent/Decree Holder (DH) that had mounted to a sum of Rs.3.50 lacs as on 31.8.2016, in terms of the order dated 31.8.2016 pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »