Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India & Anr vs.mr.d.a. Pingle, Director, Sainath Enterprises ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS (C) 353/2015 & CM APPL. 44754/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate Versus MR.D.A. PINGLE, DIRECTOR, SAINATH ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Neela Gokhale, Advocate. % Date of Decision :29. h May, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 26th November, 2010 passed by this Court in Cont.Cas(C) No.946/2009 and FAO (OS) No.436/2009.2. The facts relevant to the present contempt petition, are that pursuant to the acceptance of the respondents bid, the following four contracts were awarded to the respondent:-"(i) CA No.DGMA/Phase-I/Pune (Camp Area)/ ARMY/06 of 2005-06 Construction of dwelling units including allied external service at camp area, Pune (ii) CA No.DGMAP/Phase (Army) 08 of 2005-06 II/KIRKEE (BEG&DUNJRIK) Pune (iii) CA No.DGMAP/Phase I/Pune ...
Satish vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
CRL.A.71/2015 * % + SATISH THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 05.2017 Delivered on:29. 05.2017 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Ms.Nikita Sharma. : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP. JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 Satish, the appellant has been convicted under Section 307 IPC and has been sentenced to undergo RI for four years, to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for three months by the judgment and order dated 16.12.2014/19.12.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.45/2014 arising out of FIR No.52/2013 (P.S.Kanjhawala) instituted for the offence under Section 307 of the IPC.2. The appellant caused injuries to one Smt.Poonam, his wife by sprinkling kerosene oil on her and attempting to burn her on 14.02.2013....
Smt. Shakuntla Educational and Welfare Society & Ors. Vs.s.e. Investme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 194/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. S.E. INVESTMENTS LTD. versus WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 195/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 196/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 197/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. + O.M.P. (COMM) 198/2017 WITH ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. ........ Petitioners O.M.P. (COMM.) 194/2017& Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 33 versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent + O.M.P. (COMM) 199/2017 WITH S.E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL...
Sh. Raju @ Rajesh Kumar & Anr. Vs.sh. Jagdish
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.159/2017 + % SH. RAJU @ RAJESH KUMAR & ANR. 29th May, 2017 ..... Appellants Mr. Vijay Dalal, Advocate. Through: versus SH. JAGDISH CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.21109/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.159/2017 and C.M. No.21110/2017 (stay) 2. Learned counsel for the appellants/defendants at the outset concedes that possession of the suit property has already been taken over by the respondent/plaintiff.3. The present appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 17.12.2016 and the First Appellate Court dated 18.4.2017; by which the suit filed by the RSA No.159/2017 Page 1 of 5 respondent/plaintiff for possession and permanent and mandatory injunction has been decreed and the appe...
Manju Jain vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : MAY29 2017 CRL.M.C. 2265/2017 MANJU JAIN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Jaivir Bains, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Anita Abraham, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.9261/2017 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2265/2017 1. Present petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) by an order dated 2.8.2016.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The respondent is facing trial in case FIR No.1Crl.M.C.2265/2017 Page 1 of 2 registered under Sections 420 IPC at Police Station Vasant Kunj North. By an order dated 2.8.2016 in Bail Application No.1605/2016, the respondent was granted anticipatory b...
Jatin Tyagi vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (CRL) 1115/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 29th, 2017 JATIN TYAGI Through: Mr. Abhay Mani Tripathi, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, Mr. Sindhu, Inspector Ajay Advocates with Kumar, Police Station Pandav Nagar, Delhi Mr. Tushar Mittal, Advocate respondent No.2 Siddharth for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Jatin Tyagi for quashing of FIR No.0411/2016, under Sections 67 of I.T Act registered at Police Station Pandav Nagar, Delhi on the basis of a settlement deed arrived at between the petitioner and Respondent No.2, namely, Smt. Sweta Tyagi.2. Learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) for respondent...
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs.rail Vikas Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 ARB.P. 21/2017 AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus ..... Respondent RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr P. Chidambaram and Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocates with Mr Manu Sheshadri, Ms Sahiba Ahluwalia, Mr Ishan Bisht and Mr Tanmay Nandi Mr N.K. Kaul, ASG with Mr Anil Seth, Mr Udit Seth, Mr Samar and Ms Hansa Kaul. For the Respondent: CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (hereinafter referred to as Afcons) has filed the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) inter alia praying that an arbitrator be appointed - on behalf of the respondent, Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL) - for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the agreement dated 12.12.2011.2. The controversy involved in the present case essenti...
Ghanshyam @ Raju vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:17. 05.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:29. 05.2017 CRL.A. 52 /2016 GHANSHYAM @ RAJU versus ... Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocates. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MS JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provisions of section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as CrPC), assails the judgment dated 28.07.2015 and the order on sentence dated 29.07.2015, rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.98/2014. CRL.A.52/2016 Page 1 of 26 2. By way of the impugned judgment dated 28.07.2015 and order on sentence dated 29.07.2015, the appellant/Ghanshyam alias Raju (hereinafter referred to as Appellant) was convicted and sentenced as follows: i. ii. iii. iv. Imprisonment for Life and fin...
State vs.mahender Sahni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment dated:29. h May, 2017 + Crl. L.P. 339/2017 & C.M. No.9322-9323/2017 STATE Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the ........ Petitioner State Versus MAHENDER SAHNI ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A.9322/2017(delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 248 days delay in filing the present leave to appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application and since we have considered the leave to appeal on merits, the delay in filing the leave to appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Crl. L.P. 339/2017 3. The present leave petition has been filed under Section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) praying for leave to assail the judgment dated 6th June, 2016 whereby the Trial Court had acquitted the respondent for commission of the offence by which he Crl. L.P. No.339/2017 Page 1 of 12 was charged in a ...
Monu @ Navin & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2060/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 29th, 2017 MONU @ NAVIN & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Hira Lal, Police Station Moti Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Monu @ Navin and Kuldeep Dabas for quashing of FIR No.13/2013, under Section 323/325/341/354/5IPC registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, Delhi on the basis of a compromise between the petitioners and respondents No.2-7 namely, Anil Sharma, Sunil Sharma, Raj Rani, Kanishka, Harish Badri and Radhika Rawat respectively.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2 present in the Court has been Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Crl.M.C. 2060/2017 Page1 of 7 identified to be the complaina...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »