Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abigail Louisa Clark & Anr vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~20 & 21 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Decided on:29. h May, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 1285/2017 and Crl.M.A.7121/2017 ABIGAIL LOUISA CLARK & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Annirudh Sharma, Advocate with petitioner no.1 & Ms. Anju Raheja, AR of... Petitioner no.2. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC (Crl.) for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC (Crl.) + W.P.(CRL) 1453/2017 ERIC KAMAU MULHAI KENYATTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC (Crl.) for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC (Crl.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both these cases have given rise to identical questions for consideration, the prayer made invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal W.P. (Crl.) 1285/2017 & 1453/2017 Page 1 of 9 Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) being similar, in almost id...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.rinku Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h May, 2017 MAC.APP. 1017/2015 & , CM APPL. 32534/2015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anshom Jain and Mr. Amol Sinha, Advs. Versus RINKU DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. for R-1 to R-5 alongwith R-1 and R-3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh died in a motor vehicle accident on 12.09.2013. His kin were awarded a compensation of Rs.25,85,000/- along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum thereon from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e. 10.12.2013 by the MACT, Saket Courts, New Delhi vide Award dated 09.09.2015.2. The appellant-insurer has impugned the Award on the ground that addition of future prospects towards loss of dependency is erroneous, especially in the case of the deceased who was not in permanent employment and had been working as a field boy in a private organizati...
Kritika Agarwal Thr Mother Pallavi Agarwal & Ors vs.maxfort School Roh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~40 & 41 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3072/2017 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 RAMESH BAJAJ & ORS ........ Petitioners versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS + W.P.(C) 3368/2017 ........ RESPONDENTS KRITIKA AGARWAL THR MOTHER PALLAVI AGARWAL & ORS ........ Petitioners versus MAXFORT SCHOOL ROHINI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms Ruchi Sindhwani and Ms Megha Bharora. Mr Pramod Gupta, Ms Kriti Joshi and Ms Kashvi Dutta in WP(C) 3072/2017 Mr Kamal Gupta and Ms Tripti Gupta for Maxfort Pitampura Mr Santosh Kumar Tripathi and Mr Ricwan for GNCTD. Mr Amit Bansal and Ms Seema Dolo for R-4 in WP(C)3368/2017. Mr Pramod Gupta with Ms Kreeti Joshi and Ms Kashvi Dutta for R-1 in W.P.(C) 3368/2017. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 3072/2017 & CM No.13416/2017(interim direction) W.P.(C) 3368/2017 & CM No.14734/2017(interim dire...
Satyander Singh vs.state Gnct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2086/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 29th, 2017 SATYANDER SINGH Through: Versus ........ Petitioner Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Rajender Singh, Police Station Paschim Vihar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioner, namely, Satyander Singh for quashing of FIR No.78/2014, under Section 506/354D IPC registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar, Delhi on the basis of a settlement through mediation in Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi between the petitioner and respondent No.2 namely, Smt. Muskan.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the FIR in question.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the petitioner ha...
Maimo vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~35 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 901/2016 MAIMO Date of Judgment:29. h May, 2017 Through : Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the judgment of conviction dated 24.02.2016 and order on sentence dated 25.02.2016 whereby the appellant stands convicted for the offence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for a period of three months.2. Learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset, submits that the appellant does not challenge the order of conviction and prays that the order on sentence may be modified to the period alre...
Dheeraj Singh vs.commissioner of Police Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA6932016 DHEERAJ SINGH Date of decision:29. 5.2017 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Swastik Singh and Mr. Himanshu Dagar, Advs. Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELHI & ANR Through : Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT (ORAL) SANJIV KHANNA, J.CM No.46041/2016 (Delay) The delay of 10 days in filing the appeal is condoned as there is no opposition by the respondents. The application is disposed of. LPA6932016 & CM No.46040/2016 (Stay) Having heard the learned counsel for appellant we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 30th September, 2016 whereby W.P.(Crl) No.2881/2016 filed by the appellant herein has been dismissed on the ground that it is premature and it LPA No.693/2016 Page 1 of 5 would not be appropriate and proper to set aside and quash the show cause notice dated 20th July, 2016 issued under Section 47 read with Se...
Smt. Shakuntla Educational and Welfare Society & Ors. Vs.s. E. Investm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 194/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. S.E. INVESTMENTS LTD. versus WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 195/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 196/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 197/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. + O.M.P. (COMM) 198/2017 WITH ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. ........ Petitioners O.M.P. (COMM.) 194/2017& Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 33 versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent + O.M.P. (COMM) 199/2017 WITH S.E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL...
Bittoo & Anr. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL M.C12522017 Date of Hearing & Order: May 29th, 2017 BITTOO & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Mahesh Verma and Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advs. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with ASI Rawat Singh, PS Khyala. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section. 482 Cr.P.C has been filed by the... Petitioners, namely, Sh. Bittoo and Sh. Naveen for quashing of FIR No.669/2015, under Section 354/354(D)/452/323/506/5IPC registered at Police Station Khyala, Delhi on the basis of a mediation executed between him and respondent No.2 namely Smt. Preeti on a compromise/settlement deed.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant in the FIR in question. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL M.C12522017 Page1 of 7 3. The factual matrix of the present case is that on 18...
Paras Mal Lodha vs.assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :29. h MAY, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 835/2017 & CRL.M.B. 8PARAS MAL LODHA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Raktim Gogoi, Mr.Harshit Sethi, Mr.Kartikeya Singh & Ms.Pragati Sharma, Advocates. + versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Kunal Dutt, Advocate & Mr.Naresh Gupta, A.D. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case ECIR No.14/DZ-II/2016 registered under Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (In short PMLA). Status report / counter affidavit is on record.2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent and have examined the file.3. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2016. Allegations against the petitioner are that premises bearing No.R-89, Greater Kail...
Ramesh Bajaj & Ors vs.directorate of Education & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~40 & 41 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3072/2017 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 RAMESH BAJAJ & ORS ........ Petitioners versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS + W.P.(C) 3368/2017 ........ RESPONDENTS KRITIKA AGARWAL THR MOTHER PALLAVI AGARWAL & ORS ........ Petitioners versus MAXFORT SCHOOL ROHINI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms Ruchi Sindhwani and Ms Megha Bharora. Mr Pramod Gupta, Ms Kriti Joshi and Ms Kashvi Dutta in WP(C) 3072/2017 Mr Kamal Gupta and Ms Tripti Gupta for Maxfort Pitampura Mr Santosh Kumar Tripathi and Mr Ricwan for GNCTD. Mr Amit Bansal and Ms Seema Dolo for R-4 in WP(C)3368/2017. Mr Pramod Gupta with Ms Kreeti Joshi and Ms Kashvi Dutta for R-1 in W.P.(C) 3368/2017. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 3072/2017 & CM No.13416/2017(interim direction) W.P.(C) 3368/2017 & CM No.14734/2017(interim dire...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »