Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indus Towers Limited Through: Its Authorised Signatory Mr. Amish Mehta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1560/2014 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED THROUGH: ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. AMISH MEHTA, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Through: Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gajendra Maheshwari and Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIOINER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 11(1) & ANR. Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER2905.2017 $~ * 26. + % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This writ petition by Indus Towers Limited (ITL) challenges a notice dated 22nd February, 2013 issued to the... Petitioner by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-11(1), New Delhi (DCIT) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) seeking to re-open the assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. It also seeks to challenge the order dated 20th January, 2014 passed by the DCIT disposing of the objections by the... Petitione...
Vijay Virdi vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:29. h May 2017 $~3 * + CRL.A. 448/2017 VIJAY VIRDI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Ms. Ananya Roy, Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Advocates versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.8422/2017 (Directions) & Crl. M.(Bail) No.824/2017 (suspension of sentence) The appellant has filed the accompanying appeal (Crl. A. No.448/2017) under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. thereby challenging the judgment dated 13.04.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, holding the appellant guilty for the offence under Section 299/304-II read with section 308 of IPC. Brief facts of the prosecution case as enumerated in the impugned judgment are that on 28.11.2011 at about 4.45 AM at Gurudwara Chowk, in front of Gali No.1, Fruit Market, Ratia Marg, Crl. A. No.448/2017 Page 1 of 3 Govindpuri...
s.e. Investments Limited vs.smt. Shakuntla Educational and Welfare Soc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 194/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. S.E. INVESTMENTS LTD. versus WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 195/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 196/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 197/2017 + SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. + O.M.P. (COMM) 198/2017 WITH ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS. ........ Petitioners O.M.P. (COMM.) 194/2017& Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 33 versus S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent + O.M.P. (COMM) 199/2017 WITH S.E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus SMT. SHAKUNTLA EDUCATIONAL...
Veena Singh vs.director of Income-Tax (Investigation)-I& Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1180/2017& C.M.No.5358/2017 (stay) STRATEGIC CREDIT CAPITAL PVT. LTD. & ORS. Reserved on:25. h May 2017 Pronounced on:29. h May 2017 Through: Mr.P.Chidambaram, ........ Petitioners Sr.Advocate with Mr.Siddhartha Das, Ms.Astha Nigam, Advocates Versus $~ * + RATNAKAR BANK LTD. &ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ateev Mathur, Advocate with Ms.Jagriti Ahuja, Advocate for RBL. + AND W.P.(C) 2375/2017& C.M.No.10202/2017 (stay) VEENA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.V.Lakshmikumaran, Mr.Tapas Ram Misra, Mr.Saurav Sood, Mr. Shashank Sharma, Mr.Subhashreer, Advocates. Versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX (INVESTIGATION)-I& ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rahul Kaushik, Counsel for Revenue. Mr.Ateev Mathur, Advocate with Sr.Standing W.P.(C) 1180/2017& W.P.(C) No.2375/2017 Page 1 of 54 Ms.Jagriti Ahuja, Advocate for RBL. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % JUDGMENT2905.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two writ petitions ...
Rajat Jain & Anr vs.neeta Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA Nos.153/2017, 154/2017 & 155/2017 29th May, 2017 + % 1. RAJAT JAIN & ANR. RSA No.153/2017 NEETA GUPTA RSA No.154/2017 2. MUKESH JAIN & ANR. A.K. GUPTA (HUF) 3. MUKESH JAIN & ANR. RSA No.155/2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mansimran Singh, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mansimran Singh, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mansimran Singh, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent AYUSHI GUPTA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. These Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arise from identical judgments RSA Nos.153/2017, 154/2017 & 155/2017 Page 1 of 5 passed by the courts below and therefore are being disposed of in terms of this common judgment.2. The only issue to be decided in these appeals is as to whether the suit for recovery of money filed by the respondent/...
Wholesale Trading Services P Ltd vs.insitute of Chartered Accountants ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~48 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4873/2017 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 WHOLESALE TRADING SERVICES P LTD ........ Petitioner versus INSITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr R.Subramaniam Ms Pooja M.Saigal for R-1 & 2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2905.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.21127-21128/2017 (both applications for exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4873/2017 & CM Nos.21126/2017(direction) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, inter alia, seeks a direction to the respondents to complete the inquiry on the complaint made by the petitioner of professional misconduct within a maximum period of four weeks.2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the complaint has been made by the petitioner only on 24.10.2016 and the WP(C) 4873/2017 Page 1 of 3 proceedings...
Divine Tiger Resorts & Hotels Private Limited (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs.-
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :08. 05.2017 Judgment pronounced on:29. 05.2017 CO.PET. 35/2017 DIVINE TIGER RESORTS & HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.) Through: Mr. Mayank Goel and Mr. Monamshel Maring, Advocates for the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present is a petition under the provisions of section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), filed by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of Divine Tiger Resorts & Hotels Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner Company).2. The... Petitioner Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 12.07.2007, and a certificate in this behalf was issued by the CO.PET.35/2017 Page 1 of 5 Assistant Registrar of Companies, N.C.T. of Delhi and Haryana at New Delhi.3. The registered office of the... Petitioner Company is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of th...
Abha Gupta and Anr. Vs.rashmi Nagrath and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 93/2017, CM APPL. No.12368/2017 ABHA GUPTA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Ms. Manali Singhal, Mr. Prosnjeet Banerjee, Mr. Mikhil Sharda, Mr. Rohit Kaul, Mr.Deepak Singh Rawat, Ms. Vinita Saidharan and Ms. Princy Ponan, Advocates. versus RASHMI NAGRATH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate for Jeenesh Nagrath, Advocate respondent No.1 to 3. Mr. respondents No.4, 6 and 7. for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2905.2017 1. The appellants/plaintiffs are aggrieved by the order dated 16.03.2017 passed in CS(OS) No.239/2017 instituted by them for partition and permanent injunction in respect of premises No.2 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi.2. Mr. Nigam, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the present suit was adjourned sine die vide order dated 29.10.2011, in view of the joint submissions made by...
Bhavesh Rana vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~26. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.4884/2017 Date of decision:29. h May, 2017 BHAVESH RANA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vijay Dahiya, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC & Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Bhavesh Rana, in this writ petition, seeks parity and similar treatment as has been given, vide decision dated 29th March, 2017 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Civil Writ Petition No.16209/2015 (O&M), Vishu Jain versus Union of India and Others. There are two differences between the said petitioner and the case set up by the present petitioner. The case of Vishu Jain would show that the said candidate had challenged the failure of the respondents to accommodate him in Indian Army once he was declared medically unfit to join Indian Navy....
M/S Adhunik Datamatics Pvt Ltd vs. Chandan Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:24. h May, 2017 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2017 CS(OS) 4052/2014 & IA No.14/2016 M/S ADHUNIK DATAMATICS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Ratan K Singh, Mr.Nikhlesh Krishnan, Mr.Aishwary Kumar Tiwari and Ms.Somya Priadarshani, Advocates. versus CHANDAN SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.L.B.Rai, Mr.Vijay Kumar, & Mr.Gaurav Kumar Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.14/2016 1. The plaintiff company had entered into an agreement to sell dated 11.04.2013 for purchase of 1/5th share each, of the defendants in the agricultural land falling in Khasra Nos.11(3-18), 12(4-16), 13(4-16), 19(4-16) of Rectangle No.20, Khasra Nos.13/2(0-5), 14(4- 0), 15(3-5), 17(1-15), 24(2-12), 25(4-16) of Rectangle No.25 & Khasra No.4(6-4), 5(4-9) of Rectangle No.33 total measuring 45 bighas 12 biswas, situated in revenue estate of village Neelwal, Tehsil CS(OS)No.4052/2014 Page 1 of 10 + Punjabi Bagh, Di...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »