Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Savitri Kaushal & Anr vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : April 26, 2017 DECIDED ON : MAY30 2017 + CRL.M.C. 1821/2011 SAVITRI KAUSHAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Ajayinder Sangwan, Advocate with Mr.Tarunesh Kumar, Mr.Rohan Sharma, Ms.Sweety Chattopadhyay & Mr.V.P.Singh, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS STATE & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. Counsel for respondent No.2 (appearance not given) S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.243/1998 registered under Sections 448/380/2IPC at Police Station Sarojini Nagar. The petition is contested by respondent No.2- Jasbir Singh @ Jassi (hereinafter referred to as the respondent).2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. The FIR in question was lodged on 3.7.1998 on the Crl.M.C.1821/2011 Page 1 of 5 basis of statement made by the respondent in the Police Station. In the ...
Babu vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 640/2000 BABU Judgment reserved on:25. h April, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:30th May,2017 ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI CRL.A. 720/2000 ..... Respondent Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP MOHD. YUSUF ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr.Yugant Kumar and Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates STATE versus Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Both the appeals have been heard together. Arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel for the parties and the same are being disposed of by a common judgment. CRL.A.Nos.640/2000 & 720/2000 Page 1 of 29 2. Both the appeals have been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and are directed against the judgment and order on sentence dated 09.10.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.15/1998, arising ...
Himanshu Suri vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order: May 30th 2017 BAIL APPLN. 995/2017 HIMANSHU SURI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit A. Rai, Mr. Rahmat Bansal, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with PSI Jitender Police Station Model Town, Delhi. Mr. Varun Dhingra, Advocate for Complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL)1) By this present application filed under Section 438 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.0536/2016 under Section 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Model Town, Delhi.2) The present FIR has been registered at the instance of the complainant, who has stated before the police that after marrying with Bail Appln. No.995/2017 Page 1 of 7 Shri Himashu Suri, her husband (petitioner herein) started beating her and making allegations on her character. After two days of her mar...
Javed Khan & Ors vs.state (Govt ,Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MARCH29 2017 DECIDED ON : MAY30 2017 CRL.M.C. 4004/2016 & Crl.M.A.16765/2016 JAVED KHAN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Ajayinder Sangwan with Mr.Tarunesh Kumar, Mr.Kunal Chopra, Ms.Sweety, Mr.Rohan Sharma, Mr.V.P.Singh, Ms.Rishina Parashar and Mr.Anirudha Kr.Rai, Advocates. VERSUS Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. ........ RESPONDENTS STATE (GOVT ,NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.49/2001 registered under Sections 506/507/383/384/386/387/388/340/342/3IPC at Police Station Subzi Mandi. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. It is relevant to note that the complainant Prem Chand Anand has since expired. Crl.M.C.4004/2016 Page 1 of 4 3. It is a matter of record that upon completion of investigation, closure repo...
Nitin Kumar Aggarwal vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h May, 2017 BAIL APPL. 2626/2014 NITIN KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil K. Goel, Mr. Tushar Gupta, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State with SI Madhurendra Kumar, PS EOW. Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was moved on 01.12.2014 in the context of allegations made in investigation being carried out into First Information Report (FIR) No.136/2013 under Sections 406/420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of Police Station Economic Offence Wing (EOW) (North-West), registered at the instance of Om Prakash son of Dwarka Dass (the first informant). By order dated 4.12.2014, interim protection against coercive action was granted in favour of the p...
Jagbir Singh Kalra and Others vs.registrar Co-Operative Societies and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:30. 05.2017 RESERVED ON:10. 03.2017 CM APPL.5172/2015, 17009/2015, 27393/2015 & 5305/2017 IN W.P.(C) 5785/2012 ........ Petitioner Versus NEERAJ JAIN THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES THROUGH ITS AUTH. OFFICER AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS REV.PET.558/2016, CM APPL.47499/2016, 47500/2016, 47501/2016, 47502/2016 & 6295/2014 IN W.P.(C) 6906/2012 Versus ........ Petitioner JAGBIR SINGH KALRA AND ORS. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate. Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate for applicants in W.P.(C) 5785/2012. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for North DMC with Ms. Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocates in both matters. Mr. Bhrigu Dhami, Advocate for petitioner no.14 in W.P.(C)6906/2012. Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for DDA with Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate, in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate for non-applicants in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. CORAM: HON'BL...
M/S Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited vs.m/s Ntpc Ltd. Kahalga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO (OS)(COMM) 19/2017 Reserved on:18. 05.2017 Date of decision:30. 05.2017 IN THE MATTER OF: M/S HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Paramjit S. Patwalia, ASG with Mr. G. Umapathy, Mr. Leo D. Rozario and Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocates versus M/S NTPC LTD. KAHALGAON SUPER THERMAL POWER STATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. I.S. Alag, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocates with Mr. P. Vishvanathan, DGM, Law for NTPC Kahalgaon. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant/Hindustan Steelworks Constructions Limited (in short, the appellant/HSCL), a Public Sector Company, has filed the present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, the A&C Act) against the judgment and order dated 7.2.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP (COMM) No.411/2016, FAO(OS)(COMM) 19/2017 Page 1 of 25 dismissing its petition...
Subhash Kwatra vs.the Registrar of Cooperative Societies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 03.2017 Pronounced on:30. 05.2017 C.M. APPL.48257-58/2016, REV.PET.175/2016 IN W.P.(C) 495/2007 5434/2017 & 5468/2017 IN SUBHASH KWATRA ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate with Sh. A.S. Khatri, Advocate. versus THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES..... Respondent Through : Sh. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Sidharth Chopra and Sh. Harsh Kumar, Advocates, for Applicant Nos. 1 to 4. Ms. Richa Singhal and Sh. Bhaskar, applicants in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These applications seek relief in respect of a judgment of this court, rendered in a batch of writ petitions including WP4952007, on 23.02.2016.2. The final judgment of 23.02.2016 recounted the facts, and directions were issued to the respondent authorities in respect of 29 flats that had been occupied by unauthorized individuals. The Court had, based upon...
Deepak Yadav vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (CRL) 1539/2017 + DEEPAK YADAV Through: versus ........ Petitioner Mr. Rohan Garg, Advocate STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with Sub-Inspector Manish Yadav, Police Station Vasant Kunj (N), New Delhi, Mr. Ritwiz Rishob and Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Deepak Yadav for quashing of FIR No.0237/2017, under SectionsIPC registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj, Delhi on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the petitioner and Respondent No.2, namely, Smt. Akanksha Vir Chauhan.2. Learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) for respondent- State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in...
M/S Shree Parashavnath Traders vs.m/s Asian Paints Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA4542017 & CM165052017 % Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2017 M/S SHREE PARASHAVNATH TRADERS Through Mr.C.S. Bhandari, Adv. ..... Appellant versus M/S ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shantanu Sood, Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Vutts and Mr.Aamna Hasan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has impugned the judgment and decree dated 10th November, 2016 passed by the Additional District Judge-2, East, Karkardooma Court, Delhi by which Summary Suit against the appellant was decreed with cost & interest.2. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.10,50,000/- against the appellant/defendant under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short CPC). Pursuant to the summons for judgment under XXXVII CPC, the appellant filed an application for leave to defend on 18th January, 2016. Reply to this application was filed by the respondent. The matter was lastly listed fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »