Delhi Court May 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumar Trading Corporation and Anr. Vs.m.m. Builder & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 243/2017 & IA No.6275/2017 M. M. BUILDERS ........ Petitioner S.K. BAJAJ & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms P. Priyadarshini with Mr Pradyot Pravash, Ashish Show, Mr Abhishek Gusain and Mr Abhinav Wogra. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr Lalit Gupta, Mr Ankit Jain, Mr Rishta Samrat and Mr Siddharth Arora for R-1. Mr Saumitra Snghal for R-2. Mr Deepak Dhingra, Ms Shivangi Singh and Mr Sumit Kumar Vats for R-3 & R-4. + O.M.P. (COMM) 245/2017 & IA No.6322/2017 AND KUMAR TRADING CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus M.M. BUILDER & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr Deepak Dhingra, Ms Shivangi Singh and Mr Sumit Kumar Vats. O.M.P. (COMM) Nos.243/2017 & 245/2017 Page 1 of 14 For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms P. Priyadarshini with Mr Pradyot Prav...
Meeta Sachdev vs.ashish Bharti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~7 * + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 105/2017 & CM APPL.21414-21415/2017 MEETA SACHDEV ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Indira Jaising, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ankur Mahindro and Ms. Sonal Dangri, Advocates with appellant in person. versus ASHISH BHARTI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER3005.2017 The appellant/wife is aggrieved by the impugned order dated % 1. 27.05.2017 passed by the learned Family Courts, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi disposing of an application filed by the respondent/husband for granting him interim custody of their two minor daughters for half of the summer vacations, commencing from 02.06.2017 and ending on 31.07.2017 and for release of their passports so that they can travel with him to Dubai during the summer vacations.2. Having perused the impugned order, we are of the opinion that the same is a fairly balanced one and there is no infi...
National Highway Authority of India vs.hindustan Steel Works Construct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on: May 30, 2017 Reserved on:16. 05.2017 FAO (OS) COMM222017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD. + SIPL Through: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG with Mr. G. Umapathy, Mr. Deo D. Rozanio and Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 19th October, 2016 passed by the learned single Judge in OMP (Comm.) No.94/2016, whilst dismissing the appellants application being IA No.4908/2016 seeking condonation of delay in filing the said petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by invoking the provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.2. A brief outlay of the facts necessary for the purpose of adjudication of the prese...
Wasim Akram Malik vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~6 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. No.610/2017 WASIM AKRAM MALIK Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, Mr. Prateek Gupta and Mohd. Danish, Advocates NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Sharma, Special PP with Mr. Som Prakash and Mr. Shubham Karnwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Crl. M1.A. No.9452/2017 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.A.610/2017 3. This is an appeal filed by the appellant invoking Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act (hereinafter referred to for short as NIA Act) against the two orders passed by the Special Court, NIA dated 20.01.2017 and 17.04.2017. The grievance of the appellant is that the bail application filed by the appellant is not being heard by the Special Court in the absence of records ...
Avtec Limited vs.dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~ * 18. + 19. + 20. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 519/2016 AVTEC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lal Chandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. versus DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel. WITH W.P.(C) 522/2016 AVTEC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lal Chandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. versus DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel. AND W.P.(C) 761/2016 AVTEC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms. W.P. (C) Nos. 519/2016, 522/2016 & 761/2016 Page 1 of 12 % Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lal Chandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S....
Nabil Ahmed vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$ 17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :30. h May, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 329/2017 and Crl. M.(B) 816/2017 and Crl. M.A. 7360/2017 NABIL AHMED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja and Mr. Anuj Chauhan, Advocates versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akshai Malik, APP for R- 1/State Mr. S.Q. Kazim, Mr. Luqman S. Hasan, Mr. Santosh Pandey, Mr. Suyash Bhatnagar and Mr.Bushra Kazim, Advocates for the victim CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent had instituted a criminal complaint on 22.06.2007 in the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi (ACMM) against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under Sections 354 / 448/ 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). It appears the petitioner stood summoned on the basis of preliminary inquiry and, thereafter, was put on trial on the basis of charge for offences punishable under Sections 448, 354, 506 IPC framed on 08.08.2014 to which he pleaded not guilty...
Rekha Yadav vs.shyama
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
$~69 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA8802016 Date of Decision:30th May, 2017 REKHA YADAV ...... Appellant SHYAMA Through: Mr. Sugriva Dubey, Advocate versus Through: Mr. D. D. Pandey, Adv. ..... Respondent SI Ravinder Chander, P.S. Jafrabad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the judgment and decree for possession and mesne profits passed by the learned Trial Court.2. The respondent instituted a suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits against the appellant on the averments that she is the owner of property bearing No.V-1688, V-Block, Gali No.4, Vijay Park, Maujpur, Delhi-110053, the appellant is respondents niece (sisters daughter); the respondent allowed the appellant to live in one room, kitchen and common use of latrine and bathroom of the aforesaid premises on licence basis about 15 years ago; with the passage of time, the intention of the appellant became bad; the appellant started harassing and humiliati...
M. M. Builders vs.s.k. Bajaj & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 243/2017 & IA No.6275/2017 M. M. BUILDERS ........ Petitioner S.K. BAJAJ & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms P. Priyadarshini with Mr Pradyot Pravash, Ashish Show, Mr Abhishek Gusain and Mr Abhinav Wogra. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr Lalit Gupta, Mr Ankit Jain, Mr Rishta Samrat and Mr Siddharth Arora for R-1. Mr Saumitra Snghal for R-2. Mr Deepak Dhingra, Ms Shivangi Singh and Mr Sumit Kumar Vats for R-3 & R-4. + O.M.P. (COMM) 245/2017 & IA No.6322/2017 AND KUMAR TRADING CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus M.M. BUILDER & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr Deepak Dhingra, Ms Shivangi Singh and Mr Sumit Kumar Vats. O.M.P. (COMM) Nos.243/2017 & 245/2017 Page 1 of 14 For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms P. Priyadarshini with Mr Pradyot Prav...
Om Logistics Limited vs.national Insurance Company Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.82/2017 + % OM LOGISTICS LIMITED30h May, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate. Through: versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 12.4.2016 and the First Appellate Court dated 11.1.2017; by which the suit for recovery of Rs.1,44,547/- has been decreed along with interest at 9% per annum simple. The subject suit was filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for recovery of amount on account of loss caused by the appellant/defendant/transporter by short delivery of the goods transported by the appellant/defendant for the respondent no.2 herein, and who was the plaintiff no.2 in the trial cour...
Scotia Finance Private Limited (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs.-
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :08. 05.2017 Judgment pronounced on:30. 05.2017 CO.PET. 901/2016 SCOTIA FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.) Through: Mr. Rajeev Bahl, Advocate on behalf of the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present is a petition under the provisions of section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), filed by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of Scotia Finance Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner Company).2. The... Petitioner Company has been incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 01.01.1998, and a certificate in this behalf has been issued by the Registrar of Companies, N.C.T. of Delhi and Haryana at New Delhi. CO.PET.901/2016 Page 1 of 5 3. The registered office of the... Petitioner Company is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.4. The Declaration of solvency was ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »