Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
j.m. Construction Pvt. Ltd vs.krishna Sachdev & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h April, 2017. CS(OS) No.1409/2007 J.M. CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. N.K. Vohra, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus KRISHNA SACHDEV & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vijay Kishan, Adv with Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv for D- 1 to 9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA.No.1138/2016 (of the defendants no.1 to 9 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC).1. The defendants no.1 to 9 in this suit for specific performance of an Agreement relating to immoveable property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the property seek rejection of the plaint on the ground of the claim therein being barred by time.2. The plaintiff instituted this suit pleading (i) that one Sheela Devi (since deceased) was the exclusive owner of property no.C-10, Defence Colony, New Delhi ad measuring 325 sq. yds. and construction thereon; (ii) that the said Sheela Devi vide Memorandum of Understanding executed on 17th June,...
Deep Chand & Ors. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % 1. DEEP CHAND & ORS. Ex.FA No.9/2017 Ex.FA No.9/2017 and Ex.FA No.8/2017 26th April, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shashindra Tripathi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Ex.FA No.8/2017 2. RISHI PAL SINGH VERMA & ORS. Through: Mr. ..... Appellants Tripathi, Shashindra Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.15754/2017 (exemption) in Ex.FA No.9/2017 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M.No.15755/2017 (for condonation of delay) in Ex.FA No.9/2017 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 26 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. Ex.FA No.9/2017 & Ex.FA No.8/2017 Page 1 of 13 C.M. stands disposed of. Ex.FA No.9/2017 3. This Execution First Appeal is filed by the appellants/decree holders impugning the order of the executing cour...
Harish Bajaj & Anr vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA1342017 Date of Decision:26. 04.2017 HARISH BAJAJ & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Mansi Gupta, Adv for R- 1 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) [ GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellants assail the order dated 17th January, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition (civil) No.333/2017 filed by the appellant.2. The factual matrix is undisputed.3. The appellants are the owners of the property No.F-8, Prashant Vihar, Delhi which was purchased by them from the Delhi Development Authority. The property was got converted to free-hold and registered conveyance deed dated 16th December, 2008 was executed by the Delhi Development Authority in favour LPA1342017 Page 1 of 10 of the appellants. So far as the ground floor of this property was concerned, ...
Nishant Goyal vs.ram Dulari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
$~15 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h April, 2017 MAC.APP. 359/2012 & CM Nos.6153/2012, 550/2016 NISHANT GOYAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. Versus RAM DULARI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarthi and Mr. Raman Gandhi, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.l to 4. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) The appellant has impugned the compensation awarded on 09.08.2011 1. to the mother and minor children of the deceased/accident victim. The appellant contends that the vehicle, being a Maruti Van bearing Registration No.DL2CJ6269, was not involved in the accident, no evidence was led to the said vehicle was involved in the accident and that prove that the Mechanical Inspection Report of the vehicle was not prepared at the is argued that Smt. Ram Dulari/respondent time of the accident. No.1, mother of deceased Maharaj Singh deposed that she di...
Satpal vs.satyawan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SATPAL RSA No.126/2017 26th April, 2017 Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent SATYAWAN CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.15743/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.15744/2017 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of eight days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.126/2017 and C.M. No.15742/2017 (stay) 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 1.11.2014 and the First Appellate Court dated 9.2.2017; by which the suit for RSA No.126/2017 Page 1 of 4 permanent injunction filed by the respondent/plaintiff was decreed and the appellant/defendant was injuncted from ...
Vivek@babloo@rahul vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.554/2001 Date of Decision :26. h April, 2017 SUDESH@VINOD ..... APPELLANT Through Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Parul Sharma, Adv. Versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. WITH CRL.A. No.563/2001 VIVEK@BABLOO@RAHUL ..... APPELLANT Through Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Parul Sharma, Adv. Versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J Both these appeals are disposed of together by this common 1. judgment as the same have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction and order on sentence.2. Sudesh@Vinod The present appeals have been filed by the appellants i.e. Crl.A. No.554/2001) & (Appellant in Crl.A. Nos.554/2001 & 563/2001 Page 1 of 8 (Appellant in Crl.A. No.563/2001), Vivek@Babloo@Rahul aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 30th July, 2001...
Sameer Sandhir vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t MARCH, 2017 DECIDED ON :26. h APRIL, 2017 + CRL.M.C.1030/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.11917/2016 SAMEER SANDHIR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Siddharth Luthra, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Ankur Chawla, Ms.Kanika Singh, Ms.Heena Khan, Mr.Akshay Sahni, Mr.Anupam Prasad and Mr.Ali Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through : Mr.Narender Mann, SPP with Mr.Manoj Pant, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 06.02.2016 of learned Spl.Judge, CBI whereby application under Section 173(5)(8) Cr.P.C. filed by CBI to place on record CDs (M-1& M- 170/13) (hereinafter referred as CDs) was allowed. Petition is contested by the respondent. Crl.M.C. 1030/2016 Page 1 of 12 2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned Special Publ...
S. Tech Info. Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lord Krishna Bank Ltd. (Now Hdfc Bank Ltd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h April, 2017. CS(COMM) 313/2016 & CC No.191/2008 S. TECH INFO. PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh and Mr. Pranjal Saran, Advs. Versus LORD KRISHNA BANK LTD. (NOW HDFC BANK LTD.) ..... Defendant/Counter-Claimant Through: Mr. Ajay Monga and Mr. Amol CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Sharma, Advs. The plaintiff, on 2nd April, 2008 instituted this suit for recovery of 1. Rs.1,00,00,000/- with interest, pendente lite and future, pleading (i) the plaintiff is the owner of Industrial Plot No.A-25, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044 ad measuring 10254 sq. yds. and a building comprising of basement, ground, first and second floor constructed thereon; (ii) that the defendant Bank intended to take a portion of the said building on lease for opening Information Technology (IT) Department of their Bank and pursuant to the proposal...
Amalgamated Bean Coffee Trading Company Now Coffee Day Global vs.surji ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.189/2017 + % AMALGAMATED BEAN COFFEE TRADING COMPANY NOW COFFEE DAY GLOBAL25h April, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Bipin Kalappa, Advocate. Through: versus SURJIT SINGH JOLLY Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.15577/2017 (condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. FAO No.189/2017 2. This first appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order of the trial court dated 9.2.2017 by which the trial court has allowed the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC and directed that the appellant/defendant should pay arrears of rent w.e.f May, FAO No.189/2017 Page 1 of 5 2014 to February, 2015 and thereafter mesne profits for remaining 15 months at the similar rent and till possessi...
Raj Karan Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 04.2017 ........ Petitioners $~28. * + % W.P.(C) 3543/2017 RAJ KARAN SINGH AND ORS Through: Dr. Monika Gusain and Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC and Mr. Amit Kishore Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 04.10.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in O.A. No.60/2013 & 459/2013. The Tribunal has rejected the petitioners Original Application being O.A. No.459/2013, wherein the petitioners had sought a declaration that they are entitled to get the benefits of the replacement scales given in the Revised Pay Rules 2008, issued in pursuance of the 6th Central Pay Commission report with effect from 01.01.2006, and to seek a direction to the respondents to release the...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »