Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanta Rani Chhabra vs.lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~12 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:27. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4352/2014 & CM Nos.8725/2014, 27479/2016, 34900/2016, 36290/2016 KANTA RANI CHHABRA ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Esha Mazumdar, Mr.Setu Niket, & Mr.Nishant Verma, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr.Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner claims herself to be an owner in possession of the land falling in Khasra No.5and measuring 650 square yards in village Prehaldpur Bangar, Delhi 110042.2. It is alleged that the respondents had notified the land in Khasra No.5(4-16) vide notification bearing No.F10(29)/96/L&B/LA /11394 dated 27.10.1999, under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition WP(C) No.4352/2014 Page 1 of 5 Act, 1894, for the acquisition of the...
Spacevision Impex Pvt Ltd vs.arun Vyapar Udyog Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$ 8, 9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decision on :27. h April, 2017 + CRL.L.P. 86/2015 + + SPACEVISION IMPEX PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Parvinder Khatra & Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advs. versus ARUN VYAPAR UDYOG PVT LTD & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tanveer A. Mir, Adv. CRL.L.P. 88/2015 SPACEVISION IMPEX PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Parvinder Khatra & Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advs. versus ARUN VYAPAR UDYOG PVT LTD & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Tanveer A. Mir, Adv. Through: CRL.L.P. 89/2015 SPACEVISION IMPEX PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Parvinder Khatra & Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advs. versus ARUN VYAPAR UDYOG PVT LTD & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Tanveer A. Mir, Adv. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. These three criminal leave petitions arise out of three identical judgments rendered on 30.10.2014 by the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate (South)-01 on the files of three similarly placed complaint Crl. L.P. Nos...
Federation of Retired Lic Class I Officer vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 184/2007 % Reserved on :21. t February, 2017 Pronounced on:27. h April, 2017 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICER........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Mr.Ashish Garg, Ms. Mahima Rathi & Mr. S. Bushra Kazim, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri & Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for LIC. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav & Mr. Tanuj Chopra, Advocates for UOI. + W.P.(C) 9440/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri & Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for LIC. versus KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. Through Nemo. + W.P.(C) 9442/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA &ORS..... Petitioners Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Suraji...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.jasmer Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 27, 2017 W.P.(C) 20683/2005 & C.Ms.13569/05, 61DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi and Mr. versus Moksh Pasrija, Advocates JASMER SINGH & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar and Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT... Petitioners application under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stands dismissed vide impugned order of 6th August, 2005 by Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) while holding that the alleged misconduct against respondent-workman herein does not stand established. The facts already noted in impugned order need no reproduction. Suffice to note that respondent-conductor was proceeded against departmentally on account of non-issue of tickets to two passengers although he had collected the fare. On the aforesaid misconduct, respo...
Aakash Sharma vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (CRL) 1097/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: April 27th, 2017 AAKASH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh Patiyal, Adv. STATE & ANR versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC, Addl. SHO, ACP Sarai Rohilla and W/SI Sonu, PS Roop Nagar. Respondent no.2 in person with Mr.Surender Nagpal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution 1. of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Aakash Sharma for quashing of FIR No.41/2017, under Sections 354/354-A/341 IPC registered at Police Station Roop Nagar, Delhi on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the petitioner and Respondent No.2, namely, Smt. Harshita. Learned Additional Standing Counsel 2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in...
M P State Cooperative Consumer Federation Ltd vs.national Cooperative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 69/2017 & CM Nos. 10005-10008/2017 Date of decision :27. h April, 2017 M P STATE COOPERATIVE CONSUMER FEDERATION LTD Through: Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, Adv. versus ..... Appellant NATIONAL COOPERATIVE CONSUMERS FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anju Bhattacharya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.10005-10006/2017 1. Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. These applications are disposed of. CM No.10008/2017(delay in refiling) 2. Notice.3. Ms. Anju Bhattacharya accepts notice for the respondents.4. Having regard to the nature of the application, no reply is necessary and counsels are orally heard. We are satisfied that the learned counsel for the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause beyond his control from refilling the appeal FAO(OS) 69/2017 Page 1 of 7 after the same was returned under office ...
Itc Limited vs.m/s Arora Offset Printers & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~10. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 127/2016 and CM APPL. 43530-31/2016 ITC LIMITED Through: Ms. Nupur Lamba, Advocate ..... Appellant M/S ARORA OFFSET PRINTERS & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Dimple Vivek, Advocate for R-1, 5, 6 and 8. Mr. Kuldeep, Advocate for Mr. Akhilesh Dixit, Advocate for R-2 to 4 and 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The appellant/plaintiff, aggrieved by an order dated 18.11.2016 ORDER2704.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS(COMM) 1512/2016, whereunder notice was issued on the stay application filed by it under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC (I.A. 14230/2016), has filed the present appeal with a grievance that no ex-parte ad interim injunction was granted in its favour though it deserved one.2. Vide order dated 23.11.2016, the predecessor Bench had granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the appellant. Simultaneously, Local Commissioners were...
Rahis @ Ganja vs.the State (Govt. of Nct), Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h APRIL, 2017 DECIDED ON :27. h APRIL, 2017 + CRL.A.23/2016 RAHIS @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amit Kumar, Proxy counsel. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT), DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.469/2014 titled Rajesh @ Prem vs. State NCT of Delhi . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE APRIL27 2017 / tr...
Dinesh Gupta & Ors. Vs.rakesh Kumar Jain & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 04.2017 % + O.M.P. (COMM) 4/2016 DINESH GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Ms Nandita Arora. : Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr A K Bajpai, Mr Chetan Gautam and Mr Amit. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an award dated 12.10.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) passed by the sole arbitrator, Justice A.P. Shah (Retd.), who was appointed as an arbitrator by an order dated 12.07.2011 passed by this court in Arb.P. No.167/2011.2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of the disputes that had arisen in relation to an agreement dated 13.01.2007 (hereafter the Agreement) entered into between the petitioner...
M/S Agarpara Company Ltd and Anr vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2017
$~7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11921/2016 and CM APPL. 47024/2016, 48088/2016, 48089/2016, 1431/2017, 2020/2017, 11566-69/2017, 11572-73/2017 M/S AGARPARA COMPANY LTD AND ANR Through: Ms Rekha Palli, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shruti Munjal, Advocate for petitioner No.1. Ms. Purti Marwaha, Advocates for petitioner No.2. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Advocate with Ms. Garima Singh Yadav, Mr. Philomon Kani and Ms. Kriti Handa, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr. Amit S. Chadhha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate for R-8. Mr. Atishi Dipankar, Advocate for 5 Workers Union. Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Senior Advocate with Ms. Indrani Mukherjee, Advocate for CM APPL. 48086- 87/2016. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2704.2017 1. Ms. Palli, learned Senior Advocate appearing f...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »