Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Suresh Chand Kuntal vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2017
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :18. h APRIL, 2017 + CRL.M.C.4894/2016 DR. SURESH CHAND KUNTAL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Amitesh Gaurav, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner with the prayer that sentences awarded to him under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act in three different complaint cases be ordered to run concurrently. Respondent No.2 did not opt to contest the petition despite service.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. The petitioner was convicted in Complaint Case Nos. 1496/2014, 1497/2014 & 1498/2014 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to undergo SI for six months with fine `1.50 lac; SI for four months with fine `1.10 lac; and, SI for six months with fine `1...
Bhanwar Singh vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2017
$-22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA9302015 Date of Decision:18. 04.2017 BHANWAR SINGH Through: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan with Mr. ..... Appellant UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus Rahman and Md.Khairul Hussain, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Archana Gaur, Adv. for R-1. Ms.Tamali Wad and Ms.Nidhi Jacob, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant challenges the impugned judgment dated 7th August, 2015 passed in W.P.(C) No.4127/2014 whereby challenge was made to the Pension Payment Order dated 16th June, 2014 issued by the respondent No.2 whereby his pension has been reduced.2. It was contended that the case was of loss having civil consequences, arbitrary and not sustainable in the eyes of law. The appellant was working as Registrar with the National School of Drama (Respondent No.2) and retired on 31st July, 2013. At the LPA9302015 1 of 6 time of his retirement, only GPF w...
Ameet Lalchand Shah & Ors vs.rishabh Enterprises & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:17.04.2017 + FAO (OS) (COMM) 85/2017, CM Nos.14329-14330/2017 and CAV No.368/2017 AMEET LALCHAND SHAH & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. Yatinder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey and Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advocates versus RISHABH ENTERPRISES & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Dr. Saif Mahmood, Mr. Anish Dayal, Mr. Namit Suri and Mr. Amit Bhandari, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against an order of the learned single Judge declining an application under Section 8 (of the Act) to refer the subject matter of the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiffs to arbitration.2. The brief facts are that on 01.02.2012, M/s Juwi India Renewable Energies P. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as...
Naval Kishore vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.1747/2014 Judgment reserved on :22. d March, 2017. Date of decision :17. h April, 2017. NAVAL KISHORE ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjit Sidhu, Amicus Curiae for the appellant. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Addl.P.P. for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This appeal has been instituted by the appellant Naval Kishore son of Shri Bhagwati Prasad assailing the impugned judgment dated 26.07.2014 and impugned order on sentence dated 30.07.2014 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 (North), Rohini Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.43/2014 in relation to FIR No.13/11, P.S. S.P. Badli. Vide the impugned judgment dated 26.07.2014, the accused/the appellant herein Naval Kishore was convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and vide...
Kartar @ Rajesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment dated 17th April, 2017 CRL.A. No.555/2000 KARTAR @ RAJESH ..... Appellant STATE Through Ms.Prerna Arora, Amicus Curiae versus Through Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The sentence of the appellant in this matter was suspended by an order of 24.07.2002. When the appeal was taken up for hearing on 19.08.2016 none was present on behalf of the appellant and therefore bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.10,000/- through SHO, PS Sultan Puri for appearance of the appellant were issued. Since the bailable warrants were received unserved, bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.5,000/- against the appellant and the surety were again issued.2. On 18.11.2016, keeping in mind the report of the SHO, this Court directed the trial Court to undertake the process under Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure qua the appellant and a report be...
Dr. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir vs.amrit Pal Singh Gambhir & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
+ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF DECISION:17. H APRIL, 2017 IA No.18977/2013 (of defendant no.1 under Section 94 CPC in CS(OS) No.1560/2006 DR. SUKHDEV SINGH GAMBHIR Through: None. ..... Plaintiff Versus AMRIT PAL SINGH GAMBHIR & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Salil Paul, Adv. for D-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.18977/2013 (of defendant no.1 under Section 94 of the CPC) 1. A suit being Suit No.371/1998 was instituted in this Court by Dr. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir against his brothers Amrit Pal Singh Gambhir (defendant no.1) and Inderjit Singh Gambhir (defendant no.2) for partition of property No.13A/6A, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The suit, upon enhancement in the year 2003 of the minimum pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court, was transferred to the District Judge and numbered as Suit No.281/2003 and re-numbered as Suit No.134/2005 and vide order dated 29th Octob...
Sh. Dinesh Kumar Dixit vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.134/2014 + % SH. DINESH KUMAR DIXIT17h April, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Bhatia and Mr. Rajesh Bhatia, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate for Ms.Nidhi Raman, Advocate for DDA. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for LIC/proposed respondent. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RSA No.134/2014 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 9165/2014 (for stay) & 3352/2015 (under Order XLI Rule 27 (a) & (b) read with Order XLII, Rule 1 CPC) 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the appellant (plaintiff in the suit) under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 19.1.2013 and the First Appellate Court dated RSA No.134/2014 Page 1 of 7 7.9.2013; whereby the suit of the appellant/plaintiff filed agai...
Jah Developers Private Limited and Anr. Vs.state Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3291/2017 % 1. JAH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. I. S. Alag, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Kumar and Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocates. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate with and Mr.Amrik Ram, Chief Manager. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER1704.2017 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia that till disposal of Misc. Appeal No.165/2017 that is pending before the DRAT against an order dated 21.03.2017, passed by DRT-II in I.A. No.170/2016, proceedings before the DRT be stayed.2. Vide order dated 21.03.2017, passed by DRT-II, an application filed by the petitioner seeking permission to cross-examine the witness of the respondent No.2/Bank, was rejected with costs.3. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has filed an appeal before the DRAT registered as Misc....
Anil Thakkar & Ors. Vs.shalu Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ex. FA No.16/2016 & CM No.23801/2016 + % ANIL THAKKAR & ORS. 17th April, 2017 ..... Appellants Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A.K.Mehta and Mr. Adbhut Pathak, Advocates. Through: versus SHALU KAPOOR Through: Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand and ..... Respondent Mr. J.K.Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this Execution First Appeal, the appellants/objectors impugn the judgment of the executing court dated 9.6.2016, by which the executing court has dismissed the objections filed and held that the cheque given by the appellant no.1, and who is the father of the defendant no.1/judgment-debtor no.1, is liable for encashment of cheque given by him towards satisfaction of the judgment and decree dated 2.12.2009.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs.18 lacs along with Ex. FA No.16/2016...
I K Saini vs.the Department of Food and Supplies, Government of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2017
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2627/2017 Judgment delivered on:17. 04.2017 I K SAINI ........ Petitioner versus THE DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND SUPPLIES, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS:... Petitioner in person. Mr Devesh Singh and Mr Vinod Kumar Bhati for R-1 to 4 & 6. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1704.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.11349 /2017 (exemption) W.P.(C) 2627/2017 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to take action with regard to the issuance of food card No.004491, which is allegedly obtained on the basis of the forged W.P.(C) No.2627 /2017 Page 1 of 3 signatures of the grandfather of the petitioner.2. Further direction is sought to conduct specific enquiry regarding the food card issued to respondent No.5.3. The contention...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »