Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
c.j.international Hotel Limited vs.hotel Mazdoor Union
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) + W.P.(C) 46/2015 Date of decision: April 19, 2017 HOTEL LE-MERIDIEN C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTEL LIMITED Through: Mr. Shashank & Mr. Saurabh ........ Petitioner Versus Munjal, Advocates HOTEL MAZDOOR UNION Through: Mr. Ravindera S. Garia, ..... Respondent (ii) + W.P.(C) 376/2015 Mr. Shashank Singh & Mr. Maruf Khan, Advocates C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTEL LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank & Mr. Saurabh Munjal, Advocates Versus HOTEL MAZDOOR UNION Through: Mr. Ravindera S. Garia, ..... Respondent Mr. Shashank Singh & Mr. Maruf Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL C.M. 42154/2016 (u/S5of The Limitation Act) in W.P.(C) 46/2015 C.M. 42153/2016 (u/S5of The Limitation Act) in W.P.(C) 376/2015 There is delay of 28 days in filing the accompanying petitions. W.Ps. (C) 46/2015 & 376/2015 Page 1 of 5 Upon hearing, I find that averments made in these applications provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasi...
Meeenal Passi vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
$~53 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA No.286/2017 and CM Nos.14667-69/2017 Date of decision :19. h April, 2017 MEEENAL PASSI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anshul Rai and Mr. Chandrsekhar A.C., Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. B.K. Sood and Mr. Sandeep Thukral, Advs. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM Nos.14668-69/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. LPA2862017 and CM Nos.14667/2017 1. The appellant before us had filed W.P.(C)No.2357/2017 assailing the action of the respondents in proposing to commence LPA No.286/2017 Page 1 of 3 disciplinary proceedings against her order of suspension. It appears that an interim order dated 14th March, 2017 (page185) was passed staying the disciplinary proceedings which was premised on the appellants submission that the consultatio...
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. V ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
$~ * 10. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA1612016 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-XI & ANR. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Vikash Maheshwari, Advocates. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER1904.2017 1. This appeal by the National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Limited (NAFED) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is directed against an order dated 16th October, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA Nos. 1999 & 2000/Del/2008 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2001-02 and 2002-03.2. On 23rd February, 2016, while admitting this appeal the Court framed the following question of law for consideration: ITA No.161 of 2016 Page 1 of 8 Whe...
Jaishree vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :17. h JANUARY, 2017 DECIDED ON :19. h APRIL, 2017 CRL.A.1382/2013, CRL.M.B.1608/2016 & 3126/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.1479/2016 JAISHREE STATE ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with versus Ms.Vaishali Soni, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. CRL.A.1268/2013 BALBIR SINGH & ANR. Through : Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with versus Ms.Vaishali Soni, Advocate. ..... Appellants STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + AND + S.P.GARG, J.1. Crl.A.1382/2013 has been preferred by the appellant Jaishree (hereinafter referred to A-1) to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.09.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Crl.A.1382/2013 & connected matter Page 1 of 20 Case No.05/2013 arising out of FIR No.399/2002 PS Prashant Vihar whereby she was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 498A, 376 read with Section 109 IP...
Sultan & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (CRL) 920/2017 Date of Hearing & Order: April 19th, 2017 SULTAN & ORS Through Mr.R.P.S. Bhati, Adv. Versus ........ Petitioner STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv. and ASI Sanjeev, PS Seemapuri. Respondent No.2 in person with Mr.Gaurav Vats, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sultan, Smt. Zareena Khatoon, Sh. Sarfuddin, Sh. Shamshuddin, Smt. Seema Malita and Smt. Parkhi Bhati for quashing of FIR No.872/2016, under Sections 341/323/354-B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi on the basis of mediation proceedings at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma, Delhi arrived at between the petitioners and Respondent No.2, namely, Smt. Haseen Jahan. Learned Additional Standing Counsel ...
M/S s.a. Builders Ltd. Vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 04.2017 EX.P. 99/1998 + M/S S.A. BUILDERS LTD. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder ..... Decree Holder ..... Judgement Debtor : Mr Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr Tarun Gupta, Advocate. For the Judgment Debtor : Mr Sunil Goel, Standing counsel for Nr. DMC along with Mr Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Executive Engineer, MCD. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT EA(OS) No.34/2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J M/s S A Builders Ltd., the Decree Holder, (hereafter SAB) has filed 1. the above captioned petition for enforcement of an arbitral award dated 16.12.1997. SAB has filed the present application seeking directions, inter alia, praying that the Judgment Debtor (hereafter MCD) be directed to pay the balance decretal amount of 9,10,43,399.53 (as on 31.12.2015) along with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 18% per annum.2. The controversy involved in the p...
Chetan Prakash Sharma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:19. h April, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 971/2013 CHETAN PRAKASH SHARMA Through : Mr Anil K. Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr Sunil Jain & Md. Imteyaz, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : MrNarender Mann, SPP with MrManoj Pant, Adv. for CBI. Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. Nos.6375, 16200, 16666, 19214/2014 and 8275/2015 This petition was disposed of vide judgment dated 24.07.2013. Thereafter several applications were filed to monitor the progress of the issues that were brought to the notice of the Court. The petitioner/applicant approached this Court stating that the contents of the FIR reveal information with regard to offences committed by several public servants that was sought to be subject matter of WP(Crl) No.971/2013 Page 1 of 3 blackmail by certain individuals. T...
Sharafat Hussain & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1232/2017 + SHARAFAT HUSSAIN & ORS Date of Hearing & Order: April 19th , 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Gaurav Vats, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with W/ASI Pisha Sharma, PS Seemapuri. Respondent no.2 in person with Mr.R.P.S. Bhati, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sharafat Hussain, Sh Junaid, Sh. Aashiq, Sh. Naushad, Sh. Shahnawaz and Sh. Shahrukh for quashing of FIR No.873/2016, under Sections 342/324/354-B/4IPC registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi on the basis of settlement deed arrived at between the petitioners and Respondent No.2, namely, Sh. Saddam. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question. Learned Additional Standing Coun...
Sunil Mittal & Anr vs.darzi on Call
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h April, 2017. CS(COMM) 1381/2016 SUNIL MITTAL & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. D.K. Yadav & Mr. Sudhir Balyan, Advs. Versus DARZI ON CALL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Bhardwaj Jaishankar, Ms. Pragya Mishra & Mr. Ashutosh Nagar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.12449/2016 (of plaintiffs u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.15269/2016 (of defendant u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) 1. The plaintiffs Mr. Sunil Mittal and Darzi (India) LLP claiming to be registered proprietor of the label mark / IAs No.12449/2016 & 15269/2016 in CS(COMM) No.1381/2016 Page 1 of 29 in respect of textile cloth included in Class 24 (of IV Schedule of Trade Marks Rules, 2002) have sued the defendant M/s Darzi on Call (a partnership of Md. Ali Reza, Ms. Nazia Nabi and Sh. Avinash Kumar) for injunction restraining the defendant from using the word DARZI or any other word, mark, label identi...
Hotel Le-Meridien c.j.international Hotel Limited vs.hotel Mazdoor Uni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) + W.P.(C) 46/2015 Date of decision: April 19, 2017 HOTEL LE-MERIDIEN C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTEL LIMITED Through: Mr. Shashank & Mr. Saurabh ........ Petitioner Versus Munjal, Advocates HOTEL MAZDOOR UNION Through: Mr. Ravindera S. Garia, ..... Respondent (ii) + W.P.(C) 376/2015 Mr. Shashank Singh & Mr. Maruf Khan, Advocates C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTEL LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank & Mr. Saurabh Munjal, Advocates Versus HOTEL MAZDOOR UNION Through: Mr. Ravindera S. Garia, ..... Respondent Mr. Shashank Singh & Mr. Maruf Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL C.M. 42154/2016 (u/S5of The Limitation Act) in W.P.(C) 46/2015 C.M. 42153/2016 (u/S5of The Limitation Act) in W.P.(C) 376/2015 There is delay of 28 days in filing the accompanying petitions. W.Ps. (C) 46/2015 & 376/2015 Page 1 of 5 Upon hearing, I find that averments made in these applications provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasi...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »