Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh Chand Arora vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~60 * % + W.P.(C) 3298/2017 and C.M. Appl. 14393/2017 SURESH CHAND ARORA Date of Decision:20. h April, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.N. Dubey, Mr. M.N. Khan, Advs. versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM Appl 14394/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3298/2017 1.2. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. The petitioner has challenged the demolition order dated 23rd January, 2017 on the ground that the petitioner was not served with the show cause notice dated 11th January, 2017.3. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced the original record according to which the notice dated 11th January, 2017 was sent to the petitioner by speed post. There is no record of the service of the said notice on the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the postal authorities...
d.d.a. & Ors. Vs.ram Kaur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2017
$~5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2016 Decided on:20. 04.2017 + RFA4092004, C.M. APPL.9099/2004 D.D.A. & ORS. ..... Appellants versus RAM KAUR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + L.P.A No.58/2005, CM No.749/2005, 7754/2013, 7727-7729/2016 MCD .......Appellant versus D.R. Parashar & Ors .......Respondents Present: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing counsel for appellant/ North DMC in Item no.5. Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for DDA. Ms.Shalini Kapoor, Ms.Promil Seth, Ms.Ruhini Dey and Mr.Dikshant Khanna, Advocates for respondents in item no.4. Ms.Asha Jain Madan and Ms.Nivedita Grover, Advocates for respondent Mr.D.R.Parashar. Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs.Kiran Kaomudi Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for R-5 in item no.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % 1. This judgment will dispose of two appeals No.RFA No.409/2004 (which challenges a common judgment and decree of the lea...
Anuradha Sa Investments Llc & Anr. Vs.parsvnath Developers Limited & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 12/2017 and IA Nos. 1004/2017, 4716/2017 & 4749/2017 ANURADHA SA INVESTMENTS LLC & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr Samir Malik, Ms Shivangi Vaid Seth, Advocates alongwith Ms Divya Sharma, AR of the petitioners. and Mr Sourabh versus PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr P. V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr Vijay Nair, Mr Manoranjan Sharma, Mr Vimal Nagrath, Mr Sidharth Kapur, Ms Pratibha Sridhar, Ms Kaveri Gupta and Ms Divya Kapur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2004.2017 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The above captioned petition has been filed for enforcement of the Settlement Agreement dated 03.06.2016 (hereafter the Settlement Agreement). It is the petitioners case that the Settlement Agreement has been arrived at pursuant to conciliation proceedings under Sections under Part III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (here...
Subodh Kumar and Others vs.commissioner of Police and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2034/2015 Reserved on :2. d February, 2017 Date of decision:20. h April, 2017 SUBODH KUMAR AND OTHERS ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Satyakam, ASC for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for SSC. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2952/2015 KAPIL DEV AND OTHERS ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for SSC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: These writ petitions impugn the order dated 18th July, ...
Raj Rewal vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2017
$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2731/2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 04.2017 RAJ REWAL versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Roma Bhagat, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vidur Mohan and Mr. Kartik Rai, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Adwaita Sharma and Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Advocates for ITPO. Mr. Anil Grover with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Mishal Vij, Advocates for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) ORDER2004.2017 CM No.11841/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. WP(C) 2731/2017 Page 1 of 18 WP(C) 2731/2017 & CM No.11840/2017 (directions) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks the following reliefs:-"a) Direct the... RESPONDENTS to declare Hall of Nations, Halls of Indust...
Alok Gupta vs.indian Overseas Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2969/2017 & CM129082017 1. ALOK GUPTA Through : Mr. Shalabh Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Through : Mr. Kunal Tandon with Mr. Shashank Shebhar, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % Counsel for the petitioner states that he has discharged the obligations ORDER2004.2017 as undertaken and recorded in the consent order dated 31.3.2017 and he has filed an affidavit, as directed, with a copy to the other side.2. Counsel for the respondent states that the consent order will bind the account of M/s Shree Hari Overseas Pvt. Ltd. alone and the respondent/Bank reserves its right to take appropriate action against the petitioner in respect of the default committed in other accounts.3. Counsel for the petitioner is agreeable to the said submission and states that no further orders are required to be passed on the present petition. WP(C)29...
Deep Parikh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL19 2017 BAIL APPLN. 1849/2014 & Crl. M A Nos. 13417/2016, 12789/2014, 5901/2015 & 14254/2015 DEEP PARIKH Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar & Mr. Ankit Dixit, Advocates. ........ Petitioner Versus ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP Mr. Jinendra Jain, Advocate with Ms. Aastha Chopra, Mr. Vaibhav Mishra, Ms. Anandita Trivedi, Mr. Akashdeep & Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates for the complainant. + S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in Case FIR No.6registered under Sections 420/120-B IPC at Police Station Safdarjang Enclave. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the learned counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. Bail Appl.1849/2014 Page 1 of 6 3. In the FIR, the complainant implicated the petitioner, her husband and mother-in-law for...
Sudhir Kumar vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 1316/2017 SUDHIR KUMAR Decided on:19. 04.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Asish Nischal and Mr. Arun Nischal, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Dutta and Mr. Mukul Lather, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA (ORAL) 1. Vide this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 19.08.2016, whereby while he was ordered to be reinstated, the backwages were denied to him.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was employed in the office of Labour Commissioner as LDC. He was charged with demand of Rs.1000/- as bribe money from Ajay Kumar Gupta, S/o Suraj Bhan for issuing a recovery certificate to him. Since he was found to have committed grave misconduct during his employment, a Departmental Enquiry ensued WP(C) No.1316/2017 Page...
State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs.charan Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
$~29 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. L.P. 226/2017 Date of Judgment:19. h April, 2017 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ....... Petitioner Through : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. versus CHARAN SINGH & ORS. CORAM: Through : None. ....... RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 6315/2017 (Condonation of Delay in Filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 260 days in filing of the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 6316/2017 (Exemption) 2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. Crl. L.P. 226/2017 3. The present leave to appeal has been filed by the State under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 30.04.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.by virtue of which the respondent no.1/Charan Singh has been acquitted from charges u...
Raj Singh vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2017
* + % RAJ SINGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.249/2015 19th April, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prasoon Kumar Mishra, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Mr. Mohit Khubchandani Mr. Shashank Khurana, Advocates for DDA with Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Deputy Director, DDA. and CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) the appellant/plaintiff impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 15.10.2012 and the First Appellate Court dated 30.4.2015; whereby the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for permanent and mandatory injunction for directions to the respondent/defendant to allot the flat being No.310, ground floor, Pocket-B, Phase-2, Sector-24, Dwarka, New Delhi has been dismissed. RSA No.249/2015 Page 1 of 10 2. The facts o...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »