Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Sawhney Brothers vs.hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corpn.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Rev. Pet. No.166/2017 in LPA4022016 M/S SAWHNEY BROTHERS .....Appellant Through: Mr. T.S. Sawhney, appellant in person. Versus HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPN. ....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER2804.2017 CM No.16302/2017 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.16303/2017 (for condoning of 45 days delay in filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 45 days in filing the Review Petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Review Petition No.166/2017 1. The Appellant has preferred this application for review of the judgment dated 06.01.2017 dismissing his appeal against an order dated 06.05.2016 in W. P. (C) 3569/2012 passed by the learned Single Judge, who had dismissed a second review petition filed by him as being meritless. LPA No.725/2016 was filed by the ap...
Ntt Docomo Inc vs.tata Sons Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2017 Date of decision: April 28, 2017 O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) 7/2016 & IAs 14897/2016, 2585/2017 NTT DOCOMO INC. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Rajiv Nayar and Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior Advocates with Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Ms. Saman Ahsan, Mr. Aayush Jain and Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Advocates. versus TATA SONS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Darius Khambata, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Mr. Mustafa Doctor, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rajendra Barot, Mr. V.P. Singh, Ms. Anindita Roychowdhury, Mr. Ratnadeep Roychowdhury, Ms. Vatsala Rai, Mr Aditya Mehta, Mr. Ashim Sood, Mr. Abhinav Jha and Mr. Sidharth Sharma, Advocates. Mr. C. Mukund, Mr. S.M. Vivek Anandh and Mr. Shaunak Kashyap, Advocate for Applicant/RBI in IA No.14897/2016. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2804.2017 % 1. NTT Docomo Inc. ('Docomo'), a company incorporated in Japan, has filed OMP (EFA) (Comm.) No.7 of 2016 under Sections ...
Panna Lal Shahu and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~60 & 67 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 3613/2017 Judgment delivered on:28. 04.2017 RAVINDER AND ORS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus + W.P.(C) 3653/2017 PANNA LAL SHAHU AND ORS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr M.Hasibuddin, Advocate. Mr Parvinder Chauhan and Mr Nitin Jain, Advocates for DUSIB. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2804.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.15863/2017 (exemption) in W.P.(C) No.3613/2017 CM No.16084/2017(exemption) in W.P.(C) No.3653/2017 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) No 3613 & 3653/2017 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 3613/2017 & W.P.(C) 3653/2017 1. The petitioners, by the present petition, seek a direction to the respondent to re-consider the case of the petitioners based on the fresh documents that they have been able to trace out and filed with the resp...
Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd. Vs.central Public Works Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. A. (COMM.) 9/2017 SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr Suren Uppal, Ms Sneha Bahul and Ms Surbhi Gupta, Advocates. versus CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr Praveen Kumar Jain, Mr Naveen Kumar Jain and Mr Sachin Kumar Jain, Advocates with Mr A. K. Gupta, Executive Engineer of the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2804.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.5176/2017 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. ARB. A. (COMM.) 9/2017 3. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an order dated 14.03.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the arbitrator rejecting the appellants application for interim measures of protection under Section 17 of the Act.4. The appellant had filed the aforesaid application inter alia praying ARB. A. (...
Prasar Bharati vs.stracon (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DATE OF DECISION:28. H APRIL, 2017 CS(OS) NO.320/2004 PRASAR BHARATI Through: Mr. Rajeev ..... Plaintiff Sharma & Ms. Radhalakshmi R., Advs. Versus STRACON (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anish Dayal & Mr. Siddharth Vaid, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.5,80,05,000/- with interest and for rendition of accounts pleading i) that from time to time there have been dealings between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding procuring of broadcasting rights in respect of various sports events; ii) that on 24th March, 1998 an agreement (Consortium Agreement) was executed between the plaintiff, the defendant and M/s Creative Eye Ltd. for setting out specific terms for acquiring the rights in respect of sporting events and exclusive marketing thereof on Doordarshan Network; the other parties to the agreement constituted an alliance / consortium and were to pr...
u.o.i. Vs.rajesh Kumar Meena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~17 * % + W.P. (C) 6930/2009 U.O.I. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. h March, 2017 Through Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner RAJESH KUMAR MEENA ..... Respondent Through Ms.Meenu Mainee, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1.2. Rule D.B. in this matter was issued on 08.09.2009. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) dated 12.05.2008 by which an OA No.2186/2006 filed by the respondent herein was allowed as the Tribunal reached the conclusion that the departmental enquiry had not been conducted as per law, and proportionality of punishment with regard to the misconduct had not been properly examined by the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority. Consequently, a direction was issued to reinstate the respondent and his period of absence from 25.09.1999 till the date of W.P. (C ) ...
govt.of Nct Delhi thr.secretary, L&b vs.jitender & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3102017 Date of Decision:28. 04.2017 GOVT.OF NCT DELHI THR.SECRETARY, L&B..... Appellant Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatra, Advocate versus JITENDER & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J CM No.15917/2017 (for exemption) JUDGMENT (ORAL) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.15916/2017 (condonation of delay) Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that the appellant has adequately explained the delay of 181 days which has occasioned in filing the appeal within the statutory period of limitation. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed. LPA3102017 1. The appellant assails the order dated 29th August, 2016 by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 10963/2015 wherein the learned LPA3102017 Page 1 of 4 Single Judge was pleased to accept the explanation given by the respondent No.1 for the delay...
Dr Jaya Patel & Ors. Vs.bhanu Pratap & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~20 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 1071/2016 & C.M.No.13177/2017 DR JAYA PATEL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Pt.Gaurav Sharma with Mr.Mukesh Sharma, Advocates. versus BHANU PRATAP & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.T.Singhdev with Ms.Biakthan Sangi, Ms.Puja Sarkar and Mr.Tarun Verma, Advocates for MCI. Mr.Prashant Kumar with Mr.Saurabh Suman, Ms.Charu Ambani and Mr.Anirudh Singh, Advocates for R Mr.Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.S.S.Rai, Advocate for UOI. Date of Decision:28. h April, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 04th March, 2016 in W.P.(C) No.1854/2016, whereby the College-National Institute of Medical Sciences was directed to submit its compliance report with regard to the deficiencies within a period of one week and further, the Cont.Cas(C) No.1071/2016 Page 1 of 5 respondent-MCI was directed to complete the re-assessm...
Safaq Ahmad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h March, 2017 Decided on:28. h April, 2017 CRL.A. 518/2015 SAFAQ AHMAD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Divya STATE versus Chugh, Advocates. Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State with SI Om Parkash PS Anand Parbat.1. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant Safaq Ahmad challenging the impugned judgment dated 18th September, 2014 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Section of the Arms Act in FIR No.34/2013 registered at PS Anand Parbat and the order on sentence dated 22nd September, 2014 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 393 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for the offence punishable under Section 398 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period...
Prachi Jain vs.delhi Cantonment Board & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2017
$~51 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA3182017 & CM No.16163/2017 Date of decision :28. h April, 2017 PRACHI JAIN Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Adv. ..... Appellant versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD & ORS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anchit Sharma and Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appeal has been filed assailing the order dated 30th March, 2017 whereby the W.P.(C) No.1084/2014 was rejected. The petitioner challenged the rejection of her candidature for appointment to the post of physiotherapist on contractual basis for one year which was initiated by the respondent no.1 pursuant to an advertisement dated 3rd July, LPA No.318/2017 Page 1 of 3 2011. In the writ petition, the following prayers were made : a writ of Issue certiorari (a) quashing/setting contractual appointment of physiotherapist made by the respondent...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »