Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saroj Gopal vs.the State Election Commissioner & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EL.PET. No.2/2017 & IA No.4816/2017 (for stay). SAROJ GOPAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.M.M. Khan with Mr. N.N. Bains, Advs. versus $~12. * + 1. Through: None. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % This Election Petition impugns the order dated 5th April, 2017 of the ORDER2104.2017 respondent no.3 Shri R.C. Antil, Returning Officer, Ward No.18-S, Milap Nagar, South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC), Delhi rejecting the nomination filed by the petitioner for SDMC General Election 2017 for SDMC Ward 18-S, Milap Nagar, Delhi. Needless to state the Election Petition is accompanied with an application for interim relief of stay of operation of the order dated 5th April, 2017 and to direct the respondent no.3 to allow the petitioner to contest the election for the post of Councillor in Ward No.18-S, SDMC, Milap Nagar, Delhi due to be held on 23rd April, 2017.2. I have enquired ...
Shri Parmod Kumar Gupta & Others vs.smt Vidya Devi & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 04.2017. CS(OS) 131/2017, I.A. 3393/2017 ( O39R1& 2), I.A. 3394/2017 (Exemption) SHRI PARMOD KUMAR GUPTA & OTHERS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr Sameer Dewan, Adv. versus SMT VIDYA DEVI & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr Ashish Rana and Mr Shaveer Ahmed, Advs. for D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The notice in the case was issued to the defendants. Shri Ashish Rana accepted the notice on behalf of defendant No.3-Bank and raised the objection to the jurisdiction of this Court alleging that the same is barred under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) and the jurisdiction lies with Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT).2. This Court, therefore, heard the arguments of the parties on these objections treating it as preliminary issue. CS(OS) No.131/2017 Page 1 3. This suit has been filed by the plaintiffs for partition for...
Kunsang Dechen vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~95 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2830/2017 Judgment delivered on:21. 04.2017 KUNSANG DECHEN versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Simarpal Singh Sawhney. : Mr Prasanta Verma, Ms Prativa Varma, Advocates with Mr Girdhari Lal, Assistant from RPO, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) ORDER2104.2017 CM No.12347/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2830/2017 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondent to accept the surrender of the Identity Certificate of the WP(C) 2830/2017 Page 1 of 3 petitioner and cancel the same as per Rules and to issue the Police Clearance Certificate.2. It is contended that petitioner was earlier issued an Identity Certificate on 11.05.2007. The Identity Certificate was valid for a period of ten years and is due to expire ...
Hsil Limited vs.kripton Ceramic Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* % CS(OS) 2736/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :18.04.2017 Judgment Delivered on:21.04.2017 HSIL LIMITED Through: Mr.Manav Gupta and Ms.Prabhsahay Plaintiff Kaur, Advocates. Versus KRIPTON CERAMIC PVT. LTD. & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.Through: None. Defendants 1 The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profits as also damages. 2 The plaintiff HSIL Limited, formerly known as Hindustan Twyfords Ltd. is a company established in 1960, incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and is a leading manufacturer and seller of sanitary ware products, kitchen appliances, tiles etc. under CS(OS) 2736/2014 Page 1 of 6 the trademark HINDWARE, which is a registered trademark of the plaintiff since the year 1993, as well other supplementary marks/logos/labels such as H-VITREOUS H...
Kanwar Shankar vs.m/s Greatway Carrying Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.287/2015 KANWAR SHANKAR Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate. 21st April, 2017 ..... Appellant versus M/S GREATWAY CARRYING CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Ms. Pragya Srivastava and Ms. Soumya Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the appellant/plaintiff against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 6.1.2012 and the First Appellate Court dated 13.4.2015; by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 2,26,200/- along with interest has been dismissed.2. The case of the appellant/plaintiff was that he was an agent of M/s Terai Tea Company Limited, Siliguri, and this M/s Terai Tea Company sent 95 packages of tea worth Rs.1,23,000/- to the RSA No.287/2015 Page 1 of 4 app...
University of Delhi vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 21, 2017 + W.P. (C) 2330/2004 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohinder JS. Rupal and Ms. versus Disha Malhotra, Advocates GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sudhir Nagar, Amicus Curiae for respondent No.2-Devender Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL Vide Award of 23rd July, 2003, petitioner-Management has been directed to reinstate respondent/workman-Devender Sharma on daily wages and to pay him 25% of his back wages at the rate of his last drawn wages from 20th August, 2000 till the date of his reinstatement in service. The factual details as noted in the opening paragraph of impugned Award need no reproduction. Suffice to note that claim of respondent- workman was that he had worked for more than 240 days, whereas petitioner-Managements stand is that he had not worked continuously for a period of 240 days. Pertinently, trial court in impugned Award has co...
Sushil Ice Factory& Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. Vs.govt of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~101 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2480/2017 & CM No.10712/2017 (direction) Judgment delivered on:21. 04.2017 ........ Petitioners versus SUSHIL ICE FACTORY& COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD. AND ANR. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS Mr. Arjun Mitra with Ms. Jaskaran Kaur, Advocates. Mr. Kamesh Kumar, UDC, Office of SDM (North West) Mr. Brijesh Kumar Misra, Inspector. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. Ninad Dogra and Mr. Harsh Kumar, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 to 4.. : : ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2104.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to respondents to deseal the premises of the petitioner situated at C-34/2, Lawrence Road, Industrial Area and to permit the petitioner to carry out business from the said premises. W.P.(C) No.2480/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. The petitioner operates a from the said pr...
Naveen @ Sanju vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~21 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 903/2015 NAVEEN @ SANJU Date of Judgment:21. t April, 2017 .... Appellant Through : Mr.Manoj Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent CORAM: Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 374 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the appellant impugning the judgment dated 05.11.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.by which the appellant herein has been convicted of offences under Sections 147/148/149/3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC) and the order on the point of sentence dated 28.05.2015.2. The case of the prosecution as set out by the Trial Court in the impugned judgment is as under: In nutshell, the case of the prosecution as unfolded in the rukka is that on 24/9/13 at about 10.00 pm, on receipt of DD94, SI P.R....
Garima Goel vs.varun Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA Nos. 362/2016 & 382/2016 RSA No.362/2016 21st April, 2017 GARIMA GOEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.P.Mittal and Mr. Prashant versus Kumar Mittal, Advocates. VARUN GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent + RSA No.382/2016 GARIMA GOEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.P.Mittal and Mr. Prashant versus Kumar Mittal, Advocates. VARUN GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Two appeals are filed by the plaintiff in the suit. Two appeals are filed because the trial court passed the judgment only partly decreeing the suit. The suit was filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.75,704/- which was only decreed for Rs.54,000/- along with interest. Appellant/plaintiff therefore filed the first appeal seeking RSA No.362/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 5 the higher amount as claimed in the suit. Respondent/defendant filed his first appeal against the judgme...
Delhi Multi Story Building Employees Congress vs.the Management of Ins ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3428/2017 DELHI MULTI STORY BUILDING EMPLOYEES CONGRESS Date of Decision: April 21, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Taiyab Khan and Mr. A.K. Suri, Advocates versus THE MANAGEMENT OF INSTITUTE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND ALLIED SCIENCES & ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. S.D. Singh and Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocates for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT C.M. 14975/2017 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3428/2017 & C.M.14974/2017 (stay)... Petitioners are the outsourced persons/manpower provided by respondent No.2 to first respondent way back in the year 2008-09.... Petitioners had sought Reference in May, 2015 to seek regularization of their service on the post of Attendants and had demanded wages at par with the regular employees of first respondent. The said Reference is pending at the pleading stage. First respondent had issued notice inviting Tender for providing m...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »