Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jpc Infrastructure and Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs.alstom Systems India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 164/2017 JPC INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Chandan Kumar and Mr Rahul Kumar, Advocates. versus ALSTOM SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Milanka Chaudhury and Ms Abhilasha Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2104.2017 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.4823/2017 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 164/2017 & IA No.4824/2017 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the 3. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, inter alia, praying as under:-" a) Grant an injunction restraining the Respondent from invoking and encashing Bank Guarantee bearing No.542501GL0001616 issued by Union Bank of India, Hanuman Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Branch; b) Grant an ex parte ad interim order of injunction in terms O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 164/2017 Page 1 of 8 of prayer (a) above; c)...
Khanna Hospital & Anr vs.delhi Medical Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~93 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. 04.2017 + W.P.(C) 3412/2017 KHANNA HOSPITAL & ANR versus DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Praveen Khattar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Biakthansangi, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2104.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.14920/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3412/2017 & CM No.14919/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 16.03.2017, passed by the Delhi Medical Council respondent No.1, on the complaint lodged by the respondent No.3, whereby the Delhi Medical Council, finding the petitioner guilty of negligence, directed removal of the name of the ========================================================== WP(C) 3412/2...
Sanju Bala vs.state Election Commission & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~ * + :1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved:19. 04.2017 Judgment Pronounced:21.04.2017 LPA2672017 & C.Ms.No.13912-14/2017 SANJU BALA ..... Appellant Sr.Adv. with Through: Mr.Manoj Ohri, Mr.Javed Alvi, Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Singh, Mr.S.A.Rajput, Mr.M.K.Parvez, Mr.Jatin Gulia, Advs. Versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Adv. with Mr.Siddhartha Nagpal, Mr.Sahil Ghai, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Y.R.Sharma, Adv. for R-2/ECI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.: JUDGMENT Vide the present LPA No.267/2017 under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, the appellant assails the order dated 08.04.2017 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.3064/2017 whereby the appellant herein as petitioner thereof had challenged the order dated 05.04.2017 of the Returning Officer, Ward No.24-S (Bapraula) (arrayed as the respondent No.2 to the present appeal), whereby the nomination for...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs.krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:16. 02.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:21. 04.2017 ITA5782016, CM APPL.28947/2016 ITA5792016, CM APPL.28948/2016 % + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Advocates. Versus KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Surekha Raman and Mr. Anuj Sarma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. This is the revenue's appeal, under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act ("the Act") for assessment years (AYs) 2010-2011 & 2011-12. Since the issues involved in these appeals are common and identical, these appeals were heard together. The questions of law, framed for the appeal are as follows: (1) Did the ITAT fall into error in holding that the AO's order was not erroneous in law and prejudicial to the revenue, ITA57...
Moumin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MOUMIN STATE DECIDED ON : APRIL21 2017 CRL.REV.P.318/2016 Through : Mr.Tarun Khanna with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : G.M.Farooqui, APP. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Instant Revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner to impugn a judgment dated 29.2.2016 of learned District and Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.by which conviction and sentence awarded by the Trial Court in Case FIR No.890/2015 registered under Section 356/379/411 IPC at Police Station Saket were upheld. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for three years for commission of offence punishable under Section 379 IPC and Simple Imprisonment for one year under Section 356 IPC. Both the sentences were directed to run consecutively i.e. one after the other.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The incident of mobile snatching too...
Januki Kumari J B Rana & Ors vs.ashok Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 65/2017 and CM APPL. 10817-18/2017 JANUKI KUMARI J B RANA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Pranay Sarkar and Mr. Jeetu Sharma, Advocates versus ASHOK KUMAR & ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2104.2017 CM APPL. 15047/2017 (by the appellants u/O XXIII R1CPC) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellants praying inter alia for liberty to withdraw the appeal on the ground that on subsequent investigation, it was revealed that the respondents have already closed down their operations at the premises identified by the appellants/plaintiffs.2. A perusal of the order dated 23.03.2017 shows that while issuing notice in the appeal, at the request of the counsel for the appellants, three Local Commissioners were appointed to visit the markets so as to identify the shoes wit...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs.haryana Telecom Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 8, 2017 Date of decision: April 21, 2017 + MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED O.M.P. 299/2003 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Malik & Mr. Mukul Thakur, Advocates. versus HARYANA TELECOM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narendra Mohan Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Sharma & Ms. Suman Rastogi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2104.2017 1. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) has filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging an Award dated 12th March, 2003 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between MTNL and the Respondent, Haryana Telecom Limited (HTL).2. The background facts are that MTNL floated a tender dated 4th March, 1994 for procurement of 55 LCKM of underground Jelly Filled Telephone Cables ranging between 10 to 2400 pairs. Pursuant to the above tender, HTL submitted an offer which was accep...
Jai Dev vs.jai Devi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* + % JAI DEV IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.118/2017 21st April, 2017 Through: Mr. S.K. Kaushik, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus JAI DEVI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.14899/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.118/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.14898/2017 (for stay) 1. By this Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) the appellant/plaintiff impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 31.1.2014 and the First Appellate Court dated 4.1.2017; by which the courts below have dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking possession of the suit property being shop No.35, Ashok Market, Bullbird Road, Old Subzimandi, Delhi. RSA No.118/2017 Page 1 of 7 2. Appellant/plaintiff claimed that he was the owner of the p...
Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors vs.naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~2 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 04.2017 + W.P.(C) 3377/2017 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS NARESH KUMAR Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Advocate along with Mr. Manoj Kumar and Mr. Abhimannu Singh, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA (OPEN COURT) Caveat No.379/2017 Since the caveator has put in appearance, the caveat stands discharged. W.P.(C) 3377/2017 & C.M. No.14762/2017 (for stay) 1. Vide present writ petition the petitioners have assailed the order dated 20.12.2016 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A.1597/2017. W.P.(C) No.3377/2017 Page 1 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent had applied for the post of driver with the petitioner corporation in the year 2008. Since he cleared the written test, trade test and was decl...
Espire Consolidated Services Pvt Ltd vs.l.g Electronics India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~14 & 15. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EFA(OS) 13/2017 and CM APPL. 14832-34/2017, 14942/2017 ESPIRE CONSOLIDATED SERVICES PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Munindra Dvivedi and Ms. Divya Bhalla, Advocates versus L.G ELECTRONICS INDIA LTD Through: None ..... Respondent * + + EFA(OS) 14/2017 and CM APPL. 14869-14872/2017 1. MA RADHA TRUST ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Navroop Bakshi, Advocate versus L G ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT LTD Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The appellants are aggrieved by the orders dated 27.02.2017 and ORDER2104.2017 27.03.2017 passed in CS(OS) 762/2000 and EX.P. 17/2003, whereunder EFA (OS) 13-14/2017 Page 1 of 3 warrants of attachment have been issued in respect of premises No.A-41, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi, and further, the rent and charges payable by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »