Delhi Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alep Kaur vs. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~53 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.1609/2016 & CM No.6990-91/2016 ALEP KAUR ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha & Ms.Worthing Kasar, Advocates for petitioner. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through : Mr.Yeeshu ........ RESPONDENTS Standing Jain, Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr.M.K.Singh, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for L&B/LAC seeks to tender the counter today in the Court. The same is hereby being taken on record.2. The petitioner Alep Kaur (Bibi Alap Kaur) filed this petition through her constituted attorney Mr.Ajay Kumar. It is alleged that on 30.06.1982 the petitioner became the owner of the agricultural land admeasuring 1 bigha 6 biswas out of 16 bigha and 4 biswas (being WP(C) No.1609/2016 Page 1 of 7 shares in 43 bigha and 4 bis...
Anil Kumar Gupta vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~06 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.10136/2015 & CM No.24951/2015 ANIL KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha & Ms.Worthing Kasar, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr.M.K.Singh, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for L&B/LAC seeks to tender the counter today in the Court. The same is hereby taken on record.2. This petition is filed by the petitioner through a constituted attorney namely Ashwani Kumar. The petitioner claims to be an owner of the agricultural land admeasuring 1 bigha 12 biswas falling in Khasra No.1082 min, situated in revenue estate of Village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, Tehsil Vasant Vihar, Delhi which he purchased vide registe...
Joginder Chadda vs.rakesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % JOGINDER CHADDA RAKESH KUMAR RSA No.112/2016 24th April, 2017 Through: Mr. Ashok K. Singh, Adv. versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.K.Dixit, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit, against the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 18.3.2014 and the First Appellate Court dated 28.11.2015; by which the suit for possession, injunction and declaration filed by the appellant/plaintiff was dismissed with respect to the suit property being Shop No.1, Chadha Market, Village Mukundpur, New Delhi. The subject shop is said to be part of land of 2700 sq. yds forming part of Khasra No.301/223, Village Mukundpur, Delhi. Appellant/plaintiff claimed that he purchased the 2700 sq. yds (actually it is 1600 sq. y...
Suresh Pal vs.the Management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h April, 2017 SURESH PAL + W.P. (C) 2103/2012 versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. THE MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms.Aditi Gupta ..... Respondent and Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 JUDGMENT O R A L In the year 1995, a Reference was made by the Competent Authority to trial court regarding termination of petitioners service as a Beldar/Mali on 26th November, 1990 as being illegal/ unjustified and the said Reference has been answered by the trial court vide impugned Award of 21st December, 2010 holding that the petitioner/ workman has miserably failed to prove his case. The stand of the parties is duly noticed in the impugned Award and so needs no reproduction.2. Suffice to note that petitioner claims to have worked as Beldar/Mali w.e.f. 17th May, 1989 and his specific grievance has been that his juniors have been reta...
Delhi Development Authority vs.ashish Kishore
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2017
$~3&4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:24. h April, 2017 CONT.CAS(C) 23/2017 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for L&B ASHISH KISHORE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr.B. Tripathy and Mr. Randhir Pandey, Advocates With + W.P.(C) 2251/2015 & CM Nos.4021, 29010/2015 M/S PUSHPANJALI SALES (P) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr.B. Tripathy and Mr. Randhir Pandey, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS Through : Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for L&B ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv. DDA for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. One Amar Dass s/o late Shri Tulsi Dass, a displaced person Cont.CAS (C) No.23/2017 and WP(C) No.2215/2015 Page 1 of 6 from West Bengal was allotted the land by the Home Ministry against his verified claims. As per the policy of t...
Zuari Maroc Phosphate Ltd vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h March, 2017 Pronounced on:21. t April, 2017 + O.M.P. 853/2012 ZUARI MAROC PHOSPHATE LTD ..........Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh with Mr. A.T. Patra, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA ` ..........Respondent Through: Mr. P.P. Malhotra, ASG with Mrs. Mamta Tiwari, Ms. Sonia Malhotra Kumar and Mr. A.K. Gautam, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % 1.Zuari Maroc Phosphate Ltd. (Zuari) has filed this petition under Section JUDGMENT2104.2017 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) challenging the majority Award dated 9th May, 2012 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal (AT), in the disputes between Zuari and the Respondent, Union of India, Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemical & Fertilizers. Background facts 2. The background facts are that Pradeep Phosphate Ltd. (PPL) was incorporated in 1981 as a Joint Venture (JV) in the ratio of 51:49 between the Republic of Nauru and the Government of I...
Ram Rattan & Ors. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
+ % RAM RATTAN & ORS. UNION OF INDIA21t April, 2017 ..... Appellants Mr. D. Sabharwal, Advocate. Through: versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.586/2016 Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 impugning the judgment dated 29.9.2016 of the Railway Claims Tribunal (RCT) dismissing the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants. The case of the appellants was that the deceased Sh. Jaivir Singh Tomar was a bonafide passenger travelling from New Delhi to Agra Cantt. by Jhelum Express train. It was pleaded that when the train reached Nizamuddin railway station, the deceased got down from the train to fetch drinking water and after re- boarding the train, he was standing near the gate. It is further pleaded that the train took a heavy jerk, and as a result of which the deceased fell down fr...
Amarjeet Kaur vs.nirmal Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
$~47 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS)No.121/2017 Date of decision :21. t April, 2017 AMARJEET KAUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vishal Bakshi, Mr. Amit Dahiya and Mrs. Deepanshi Kumar, Advs. versus NIRMAL KAUR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant assails the order dated 20th February, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing IA No.1823/2017 which was filed by the respondents/plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC praying for impleadment of the legal heirs of the deceased brother of the husband of the plaintiff.2. We find that observations on the necessity of the impleadment had been made by the learned Single Judge in a prior order dated 23rd January, 2017.3. The impugned order is premised on a consideration of the FAO (OS) 121/2017 Page 1 of 2 necessity of the parties who were sought to be added as defendants for the reason that ...
D S Kundu vs.registrar, Coopertive Socieities & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI D S KUNDU $~18. * + W.P.(C) 3402/2017 and CM APPL. 14874/2017 Through:... Petitioner in person. versus ........ Petitioner REGISTRAR, COOPERTIVE SOCIEITIES & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumit Agarwal, Advocate for R-1 with Mr. Satish Kumar, Head Clerk.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % The petitioner, who was till recently the Vice President of the ORDER2104.2017 Managing Committee of Philips Co-op. Group Housing Society Ltd., has assailed an order dated 23.01.2017 passed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, appointing an Administrator to the conduct the elections of the Managing Committee of the Society within a period of ninety days from the date of issuance of the said order.2. Counsel for the respondent No.1, who appears on advance copy, opposes the maintainability of the present petition and states that the petitioner has an equally alternate efficacious remedy under Section ...
Indranil Chakravarti & Anr vs.the State Nct of Delhi Through of Secret ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.175/2017 + % INDRANIL CHAKRAVARTI & ANR. 21st April, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. G.C. Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH OF SECRETARY ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.14994/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.14993/2017 (for delay) This is an application seeking condonation of 334 days delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal stands condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. FAO No.175/2017 Page 1 of 4 FAO No.175/2017 1. By this first appeal filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, appellants who were the petitioners in the succession certificate case, seek for setting aside of the impugned judgment dated 30.4.2016 which has dismissed the s...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »